-
Patizi, on 15th May. 2024 at 06:37 am CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
DieWunderharke5000, today at 06:00 pm CEST
-
Pat1991, today at 05:42 pm CEST
-
Blubbo33, today at 05:39 pm CEST
-
BinGOLDiG, today at 05:24 pm CEST
-
Pat1991, today at 05:15 pm CEST
-
Rainmann, today at 05:00 pm CEST
-
Pat1991, today at 04:38 pm CEST
-
Rebella912, today at 03:31 pm CEST
-
Blubbo33, today at 02:22 pm CEST
-
Freakz0id, today at 01:42 pm CEST
-
Hightower, today at 10:15 am CEST
-
Pat1991, today at 10:01 am CEST
-
Svenr, today at 02:20 am CEST
-
Comingsoon19, yesterday at 07:17 pm CEST
-
Shiningstar216, yesterday at 06:07 pm CEST
-
sundance, yesterday at 04:47 pm CEST
-
Cheeseburger, yesterday at 04:16 pm CEST
-
gamble1, yesterday at 02:50 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:42 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, yesterday at 09:17 am CEST
-
Tiro0815, on 17th May. 2024 at 08:18 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, on 17th May. 2024 at 05:37 pm CEST
-
Jenges, on 17th May. 2024 at 03:41 pm CEST
-
WithoutWings, on 17th May. 2024 at 02:12 pm CEST
The slow demise
Liked this post: SunSun13
Thank you very much!
I can understand your arguments very well. You had already argued similarly in the threads on the money laundering lawsuit
For me, this is all understandable and certainly not wrong.
But for me personally, it's not about the future. What that will bring remains to be seen...... Instead, I'm not doing well at the moment - right now - when it comes to using online casinos. The fact alone that I have to think about so many different things before I make a few spins on a slot makes me quite thoughtful.
RTP, Bonuses, pending phases... these are all things that are somewhat understandable. Sure, I have a chance at any (I'm only talking about the properly licensed) casino to look at the RTP beforehand. A bonus is a treat and the pending phases are known.
What gives me the most stomach ache is the SOW and my house bank(s). I understand the mechanism behind it and I also know that the requirement for proof of income does not come from the casino, but from the licensing authorities. However, it is something that I will not do today, nor will I do tomorrow. Send my proof of income to an online casino. This is exactly where the line is drawn for me.
The fact that bank account terminations are currently the exception is probably true. However, I am firmly convinced that this will not remain so and a huge hole will open up here in the very short term. I would like to hear other arguments, especially in this regard. Because at the moment, I really see black here. Perhaps I'm also too pessimistic?
In the end, however, these are all good enough reasons for me to stop playing. I understand you absolutely @Daniel and also don't claim that you are in the wrong here. But just the thought that I should open bank accounts abroad, email my most sensitive data to Malta and could throw myself over with my house bank... all just to play online slots... makes me doubt my sanity.
At the moment I have reached the limit. Not because of any particular reason - which you can always get around somehow - but because of the sum of things.
But: A big praise to you! I think it's good that you are very open about this
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Liked this post: Anonym, SunSun13
100% true, the same with the 3rd Scatter, reel 1+2 come scatter, reel 3 not and 4 and 5 stop scatter 1 too early and 1 too late, so that the player thinks "shit, that was close" but it does not matter where scatter land if not as a win because only what you win and not what you just did not win is determined
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
of course it is not a coincidence for casono or slot Provider, they also have absolutely no interest in gambling and you play neither against the casino nor the game provider but against all other players there are. the one has no luck and loses 100 euros another has luck and wins 95, who the people are the casino does not matter because they earn 5 euros on it
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
Gambling will never die out and will always be offered in some form. There are many Online Casinos that have earned a certain position and they will continue to hold, I say even in Germany. We know how it works, you just have to, like any lobby, push the bills over or under the table to the right politicians or parties and then you can have your idea implemented as law. There are clever people in this industry who will use this as a proven means in the future and thus establish online gambling as legal. The OCs have so far moved on the pink cloud and for this it needs a rethinking process, but this will inevitably set in and after the first the others will follow. The large financiers (today one says to such figures also investors) behind it want to earn finally further and will not let themselves take this.
As the whole runs off and there is always the MGA in the center, if I now times of a at this time serious OC assume, is of course still extremely improvable. The topics have already been chewed over a zillion times here, but it must come in the future
1.) The central Verification at the MGA, with all the trimmings, there I also like to give once my proof of income (although this is actually bullshit, because I see with the now required unredacted bank statements anyway that once or more often in the month a salary or whatever is posted) and whatever else it takes and can play with my MGA registration in all MGA OCs. Then I do not need to think much more, at each OC with MGA license is then everything OK before I still deposited.
2.) The payouts must then be lockable in all MGA OCs and be completed immediately.
3.) Bonuses are bullshit but if anything they need to be heavily regulated with notices and software controlled limits that no one can then bypass.
4.) The game providers, who are represented in a MGA-OC, must show full transparency, what runs so far is rather so naja and much you learn only by chance, such as RTP changes or updates.
5.) There must be a central possibility to be locked at the MGA for all MGA-OCs.
There is a lot more that finally needs to be done right and where we should slowly move, otherwise online gambling always has this grubby image and that doesn't have to be.
I can understand the reasoning of the TEs but these are all just points that need to be improved to simply play online without ulterior motives.
The banking issue I want to address here briefly extra. If the online gambling should be really legal and you Deposit quite normally, as you do today also times at the betting Provider, from time to time in an OC, this should no longer be a problem. The fact that banks have their own way of reacting to risky customers is another issue and whether I order beyond my means like a maniac, deposit money on porn sites or otherwise reveal that I can't handle my money, be it with betting or gambling, I will always have a problem with the bank.
So all rather a potential for improvement, which is but until the implementation really only one and thus but also underlines the current validity of the TE-argumentation.
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
The TE is absolutely right, the way it all goes down, it's just no fun anymore.
That was simply better 2-3 years ago.
Nothing will change, rather become even worse ....
Just do not call it "gambling" but "test games"
At the moment it seems to me with all the losses that write here so some
One knows exactly about these points, that everything somehow no longer fits but one continues to pay in ?
Actually, we are pretty crazy about that ?
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
It is but the written by the TE and what improved belongs directly together! ... .that is not to be dismissed from the hand!!!
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
@Unbeliever: My intention was to reflect how I see the industry and the problems that exist "now and today" or at least could exist. Certainly, we don't know what will happen in the future. Maybe someday there will be a Europe-wide legalization and a big, regulated market. I see the chances of that far less good, but that's not supposed to be the topic.
You only touch on the banking issue briefly, but that's where I see the greatest potential danger at the moment. And I no longer expose myself to this danger. It makes a difference whether I can't control myself and order too much from amazon & Co. or whether I'm classified as a customer who pushes his money to illegal gambling providers. I'm not talking about overindebtedness and maxed-out overdraft facilities. That's a completely different issue. If you're lucky, the bank will simply classify you as a risky customer and that's it. Then you might have problems getting a loan, but that's it.
But do you know exactly how banks communicate with each other? We have just recently seen the opening clause with regard to data protection in the Insurance sector. You can no longer simply change insurance companies without the new insurer knowing your exact claims history
I don't know if this is the case with banks, but I wouldn't be surprised. Especially not with the banks in the same banking network.
My advice is to be very cautious at the moment. Nothing more.
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
Exactly there I also see the problem! Recently I had a call from my bank because of 50.00 € money received!
They knew exactly that the money came from an OC.
But it was called "general random checks" security and so ... now I learned from a "younger" banker in a nice round, that I am already Risk customer ...because too many smaller debits, but a total of more 1000 € to Ayden and Co....
For me, the Deposit from the account and payout to the account has thus done !
He said to me, times half a year nothing deposit and the banks see that you are no risk ...or addicted to gambling ...
If you get several hundred euros at the machine and pay in via PSC - all good!
If I ever again games test then only about MC ...
To all those who still do not believe that their banks will soon go the same way and must ?
Be careful ... Big Banking is watching You !
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
not necessarily everything is good then, because the bank then thinks, oh look, now the young one carries the money to the arcade instead of spending it online.
no paranoia from me, but actually already times so insinuated to me by the brothers.
once you are branded, it might be hard to get rid of the stamp at the bank.
even if you keep your feet still for a longer time and make your account movements less suspicious.
This post has been translated automatically
The slow demise
Nobody has liked this post so far
already clear
But the cloak of concealment is then highly !
can buy yes much with PSC !?
Must not have everything to do with gambling ....
This post has been translated automatically