Topic created on 20th Aug. 2018 | Page: 3 of 4 | Answers: 31 | Views: 13,915
Anonym
Former Member
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
21st Aug. 2018, at 09:19 pm CEST#21
1 Like
Liked this post: K****t
Daniel wrote on 08/21/2018 at 21:04
Man, you can't say Lapalingo is brazen. Lapalingo has only good things in mind and is definitely just misunderstood.
Wunderino and Lapalingo.
Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.
What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.
Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.
And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.
Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino that you promoted is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is better that a new player registers on Videoslots. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.
Weis still that Lapalingo has once been at the top of the list. Now you have to scroll down almost to the basement to find it at all. My, that already says a lot. Soon we'll probably have to dig a hole with a shovel to find it. Such casinos belong to the moon shot so that they can do no harm. Can yes then the man in the moon beguile and lay on the cross.
Random wrote on 21/08/2018 at 21:19
Wunderino and Lapalingo.
Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.
What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.
Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.
And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.
The MGA puts too much focus on any money laundering prevention and some on Player protection and less to hardly on consumer protection. The MGA also has no legislative function, but it only monitors that existing laws are complied with.
Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino you promote is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is nevertheless better that a new player on Videoslots registers. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.
Lapalingo is a strong shaky candidate and if it could be proven that Lapalingo actually deliberately worked with minors, then this casino would still be on the Grey- or Blacklist tonight. Maybe someone can send us a photo of the underage Calvin and a manager of Lapalingo. If there is such a photo or other evidence, then always here with it! Casinos are not deleted by us, but they are put on the greylist or the blacklist if necessary
Unfortunately, there are just too few of the 1A casinos, but also many 2B casinos and then there are the 99Z casinos (but they are not listed here). According to our own rules, we can basically list any online casino. In principle, it is only important to us that a European gambling license is available and that fair software is used - i.e. no fake slots. Of course, it is also important that the online casino pays out the winnings that were legally won and that there is no insolvency.
We try to list here as far as possible only good Online Casinos, because we could not afford it so far organizationally (lack of money and staff) simply to list more casinos. But we have now grown strongly and continue to grow strongly. Therefore, these problems will soon be a thing of the past.
Our goal is that at some point all EU casinos will be listed here - the good, as well as the bad. With us, there is yes the possibility of each online casino to evaluate and then everyone can investigate for themselves and decide whether they want to play in an online casino or not.
I think this approach is also good and better than listing only selected casinos. If, for example, the casino tester now says that Lapalingo is his absolute favorite casino, then you can look at the user reviews of Lapalingo with us, whether Lapalingo is also the favorite casino of other players in German-speaking countries and then make a decision. Otherwise, there would only be the voice of some affiliates, because on GambleJoe deleted or non-existent.
This post has been translated automatically
K****t
Forum posts:688Member has been banned
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
21st Aug. 2018, at 11:50 pm CEST#24
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Random wrote on 21/08/2018 at 21:19
Wunderino and Lapalingo.
Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.
What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.
Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.
And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.
Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino that you promoted is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is better that a new player registers on Videoslots. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.
Exactly, why is Lapalingo still listed here as a recommendable casino?
It's bad enough that they bring in such positive reviews with tricks and Bonuses on Askgamblers and try to relativize or even eliminate the negative reviews through feigned friendliness.
But here?
The connections with this fraud casino Playbet24, the whole accusations because of the minor, the disgusting bonus traps, which are provable, all the negative experiences here... alone this would have to put this casino at least on the Greylist.
I can only reiterate that Lapalingo made me write a positive review on Askgamblers against their explicit rules because I did not know that my negative review would be deleted as a result.
Askgamblers support was not fond of it.
A bonus of 25 Euro and a friendly answer from Sarah should convince me that all was well after all...
Then the countless positive reviews in the last week daily, just by promise of bonuses for it.
Sorry, but this has less than nothing to do with seriousness or trust.
Who coerces players hiddenly to convert the converted bonus SELF into real money, with the intention that they do not know and/or forget, and who coerces them to write positive reviews, has nothing lost on this market.
Lapalingo is dealt with far too gently.
I don't get it.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
23rd Aug. 2018, at 02:26 pm CEST#25
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Daniel wrote on 08/21/2018 at 23:06
Lapalingo is a strong shaky candidate and if it could be proven that Lapalingo was actually knowingly working with minors, this casino would still be on the grey or Blacklist tonight. Maybe someone can send us a photo of the underage Calvin and a manager of Lapalingo. If there is such a photo or other evidence, then always here with it! Casinos are not deleted by us, but they are put on the greylist or the blacklist if necessary
Unfortunately, there are just too few of the 1A casinos, but also many 2B casinos and then there are the 99Z casinos (but they are not listed here). According to our own rules, we can basically list any online casino. The only important thing for us is that the casino has a European gambling license and uses fair software - i.e. no fake slots. Of course, it is also important that the online casino pays out the winnings that were legally won and that there is no insolvency.
We try to list here as far as possible only good Online Casinos, because we could not afford it so far organizationally (lack of money and staff) simply to list more casinos. But we have now grown strongly and continue to grow strongly. Therefore, these problems will soon be a thing of the past.
Our goal is that at some point all EU casinos will be listed here - the good, as well as the bad. With us, there is yes the possibility of each online casino to evaluate and then everyone can investigate for themselves and decide whether they want to play in an online casino or not.
I think this approach is also good and better than listing only selected casinos. If, for example, the casino tester now says that Lapalingo is his absolute favorite casino, then you can look at the user reviews of Lapalingo with us, whether Lapalingo is also the favorite casino of other players in German-speaking countries and then make a decision. Otherwise, there would only be the voice of some affiliates, because on GambleJoe deleted or non-existent.
Hello Daniel
Sorry for the late reply.
Yes, there are unfortunately far too few 1A casinos.
A few of them I have only learned through you at all.
I am still enthusiastic about Videoslots even if the slots are not doing well at the moment.
I also understand the idea that you want to have the best all casinos listed and so to speak the users can evaluate.
But what do you think of the idea to create an extra category with just these 1A casinos?
So casinos where, so to speak, Gamble Joe puts his hand in the fire for the guaranteed everything is fine as with Videoslots.
So inexperienced users can immediately make a picture of it and the bigger Gamblejoe becomes the more casinos will try to get into this 1A list.
I can still remember when you promised a user once that you will personally transfer him the money if he does not get the payout at Slotsmillion. Such casinos I mean, where you can be absolutely sure. So safe that you would even step in with your private money because you know that everything is fine. Which you understandably would not do for example Lapalingo.
So you could advertise not so popular casinos but the players would then just on their own responsibility there collect their own experiences or can just fall back on the 1A casinos if they want to be on the very safe side.
Random wrote on 08/23/2018 at 2:26 pm
Hello Daniel
Sorry for the late reply.
Yes, there are way too few 1A casinos unfortunately.
A few of them I have only learned through you at all.
I am still enthusiastic about Videoslots even if the slots are not doing well at the moment.
I also understand the idea that you want to have the best all casinos listed and so to speak the users can evaluate.
But what do you think of the idea to set up an extra category with just these 1A casinos?
So casinos where, so to speak, Gamble Joe puts his hand in the fire for the guaranteed everything is fine as with Videoslots.
So inexperienced users can immediately make a picture of it and the bigger Gamblejoe becomes the more casinos will try to get into this 1A list.
I can still remember when you promised a user once that you will personally transfer him the money if he does not get the payout at Slotsmillion. Such casinos I mean, where you can be absolutely sure. So safe that you would even step in with your private money because you know that everything is fine. Which you understandably would not do for example Lapalingo.
So you could advertise not so popular casinos but the players would then just on their own responsibility there collect their own experiences or can just fall back on the 1A casinos if they want to be on the very safe side.
Just a suggestion.
Geiler suggestion! A similar idea came to me yesterday thanks to your post even myself, but I forgot to note it down. Thanks for replying here again.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
23rd Aug. 2018, at 07:53 pm CEST#27
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Daniel wrote on 08/23/2018 at 7:30 pm
Awesome suggestion! I actually came up with this idea myself yesterday thanks to your post, but forgot to make a note of it. Thanks for replying here again.
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Liked this post: K****t
Wunderino and Lapalingo.
Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.
What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.
Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.
And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.
Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino that you promoted is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is better that a new player registers on Videoslots. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
The MGA puts too much focus on any money laundering prevention and some on Player protection and less to hardly on consumer protection. The MGA also has no legislative function, but it only monitors that existing laws are complied with.
Lapalingo is a strong shaky candidate and if it could be proven that Lapalingo actually deliberately worked with minors, then this casino would still be on the Grey- or Blacklist tonight. Maybe someone can send us a photo of the underage Calvin and a manager of Lapalingo. If there is such a photo or other evidence, then always here with it! Casinos are not deleted by us, but they are put on the greylist or the blacklist if necessary
Unfortunately, there are just too few of the 1A casinos, but also many 2B casinos and then there are the 99Z casinos (but they are not listed here). According to our own rules, we can basically list any online casino. In principle, it is only important to us that a European gambling license is available and that fair software is used - i.e. no fake slots. Of course, it is also important that the online casino pays out the winnings that were legally won and that there is no insolvency.
We try to list here as far as possible only good Online Casinos, because we could not afford it so far organizationally (lack of money and staff) simply to list more casinos. But we have now grown strongly and continue to grow strongly. Therefore, these problems will soon be a thing of the past.
Our goal is that at some point all EU casinos will be listed here - the good, as well as the bad. With us, there is yes the possibility of each online casino to evaluate and then everyone can investigate for themselves and decide whether they want to play in an online casino or not.
I think this approach is also good and better than listing only selected casinos. If, for example, the casino tester now says that Lapalingo is his absolute favorite casino, then you can look at the user reviews of Lapalingo with us, whether Lapalingo is also the favorite casino of other players in German-speaking countries and then make a decision. Otherwise, there would only be the voice of some affiliates, because on GambleJoe deleted or non-existent.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
Exactly, why is Lapalingo still listed here as a recommendable casino?
It's bad enough that they bring in such positive reviews with tricks and Bonuses on Askgamblers and try to relativize or even eliminate the negative reviews through feigned friendliness.
But here?
The connections with this fraud casino Playbet24, the whole accusations because of the minor, the disgusting bonus traps, which are provable, all the negative experiences here... alone this would have to put this casino at least on the Greylist.
I can only reiterate that Lapalingo made me write a positive review on Askgamblers against their explicit rules because I did not know that my negative review would be deleted as a result.
Askgamblers support was not fond of it.
A bonus of 25 Euro and a friendly answer from Sarah should convince me that all was well after all...
Then the countless positive reviews in the last week daily, just by promise of bonuses for it.
Sorry, but this has less than nothing to do with seriousness or trust.
Who coerces players hiddenly to convert the converted bonus SELF into real money, with the intention that they do not know and/or forget, and who coerces them to write positive reviews, has nothing lost on this market.
Lapalingo is dealt with far too gently.
I don't get it.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hello Daniel
Sorry for the late reply.
Yes, there are unfortunately far too few 1A casinos.
A few of them I have only learned through you at all.
I am still enthusiastic about Videoslots even if the slots are not doing well at the moment.
I also understand the idea that you want to have the best all casinos listed and so to speak the users can evaluate.
But what do you think of the idea to create an extra category with just these 1A casinos?
So casinos where, so to speak, Gamble Joe puts his hand in the fire for the guaranteed everything is fine as with Videoslots.
So inexperienced users can immediately make a picture of it and the bigger Gamblejoe becomes the more casinos will try to get into this 1A list.
I can still remember when you promised a user once that you will personally transfer him the money if he does not get the payout at Slotsmillion. Such casinos I mean, where you can be absolutely sure. So safe that you would even step in with your private money because you know that everything is fine. Which you understandably would not do for example Lapalingo.
So you could advertise not so popular casinos but the players would then just on their own responsibility there collect their own experiences or can just fall back on the 1A casinos if they want to be on the very safe side.
Just a suggestion.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
Geiler suggestion! A similar idea came to me yesterday thanks to your post even myself, but I forgot to note it down. Thanks for replying here again.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
Very much.
I'm glad that you like the proposal.
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wunderino
The luck of the draw
Lapaloma
I can not read it anymore, every day complaints and why
the whole ? Because these scammers are also advertised on DSF.
This post has been translated automatically