sippi wrote on 01/16/2018 at 15:43: Well, he will have simply seen that the deletions only came about because of the links in the description ("videos aimed at drawing users away from the YouTube platform"). He just uploads the stuff again now, without description and without links.
I got this reasoning from YouTube as well. But if that were the reason, then many Youtuber would be gone from the window - or in principle 99% of all Youtuber. There are people who really overdo it with links. We only did that in the newer videos - but not as exaggerated as some others. It doesn't even have to be just in the Caisno scene, but in all industries. I've asked Youtube a couple of times to comment but only standard answers come. I think we made a mistake and that's because we didn't monetize our videos through Youtube. I can't explain it any other way.
Isn't advertising displayed anyway, even if you are not a partner? Only that one then gets no coal? And yes, if you would take that with the links exactly, then YT would be quickly swept empty in all areas. Talking to the big companies is difficult, there is no big check. And if you want to have someone gone, then they just come up with something and then do not go into it later. I was once closed the (German) Amazon partner account because I should have violated rule 1 (sexual content, or something like that). That was not even close to true, but helped nüscht, let also not talk to (text modules, closure is final, etc.).
Well first I was blocked, because of hate speech or violence or whatever. When I appealed, they told me it was because of spam. They probably only saw that we did not have so many subscribers (a little under 4,000) and also not monetarisiere and then the topic was eaten and they just classified it as spam. I am also convinced that not even a real person there looked at it.
I think that they go by the number of complaints there. For example, if you have 10,000 subscribers, then it takes more complaints from users than if you only have 100 subscribers for Youtube to react. And I think also with the subsequent objections it is more difficult with fewer subscribers that the channel is reactivated. Then you get a mail robot in front of you. On the last question I asked Youtube, came only a standard response, which had nothing to do with the question asked.
The story with YT annoys me enormously. Not because of the channel itself, but because I find it unfair. If Youtube would completely say goodbye to gambling, then I would say, well, you have to accept that. I would maybe even think that it's even better that way, because sometimes people get the videos suggested that have nothing to do with gambling and could then possibly get into the gambling addiction. But so I find it simply unfair.
Daniel wrote on 01/15/2018 at 8:16 pm: MZA panicked after Youtube's deletion action, peed in his pants and begged his followers to follow him on Twitch and subscribe to another channel. In the videos he almost had a crying fit ...
Then he deleted all his videos and renamed the channel so as not to lose this channel with over 20K subscribers. Now he noticed that (for whatever reason) no other channels are deleted and uploaded all the videos again. That's how it was.
Then he uploaded the following video, which I must admit I found kind of funny:
With the video he alluded to the video of "Say It". Here again the original:
you have to look at both to understand why mza holds the toast so demonstratively close to the camera when sharing hahaha really epic
edit: ct is still there or
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
MzA and Youtube
20th Jan. 2018, at 05:19 pm CET#15
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Daniel - why don't you just open a new YouTube channel ? I wouldn't leave the field to these spinners without a fight.
vivera365 wrote on 20/01/2018 at 17:19: Daniel - then why don't you just open a new YouTube Channel ? I wouldn't leave the field to these N***ers without a fight.
Well, I've been thinking about this for the last few days and it might have been a positive thing for me. I've been game-free for 2 months and the channel loss somehow supports me in this - at least I currently have the feeling. I've also had a few times in the last year the situation that although I did not want to play, had the feeling, you have to bring a video again, so that the people on Youtube are happy.
Since we play and have played without special StreamerBonuses, the financial effort to produce an average video was also greater than that we would ever have directly or indirectly through Youtube back in. I'm not so sure about me, since I really pulled myself together the last two years. But for Matthias it was really expensive
I talked to Matthias about it and he also said that he has only had one slip up so far this year and he feels that it might be positive because he has been playing a lot more since GambleJoe than before GambleJoe. And he was playing heavily even before GambleJoe. We both more or less developed a kind of commitment to gamble and both sometimes unconsciously gambled more often than we wanted to in order to satisfy the YouTube community.
Actually, we always wanted to run Youtube only as a side and hobby project and we only wanted to play when we were up for it ourselves. We just thought, if we already gamble, then we just record it and use the videos as a small advertising effect for our portal. But we never wanted to stream because we don't think we're that entertaining and we don't want to give up our privacy. We also don't want to gamble professionally - we don't have to, thank goodness. Unfortunately, it is now so that this - actually honest - concept is no longer so well received by the people since there are the streamers and "professional players" ...
Be that as it may. You are of course also right that we can't put up with this on principle. Therefore we are currently looking for a new concept. However, we do not want to start playing with fake and Bonus money like the others. We will certainly come back at some point. And when we come again, then violently ...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
MzA and Youtube
21st Jan. 2018, at 01:46 pm CET#17
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sounds good in all respects. In principle, it's always worth considering not playing the game at all - somehow the whole "trappings" have changed so much that it's not really fun anymore ......
vivera365 wrote on 21/01/2018 at 13:46: Sounds good in all respects. In principle is always worth considering to leave the gambling completely - somehow the whole "trappings" have changed so tremendously that it's not really fun anymore ......
something will always change and you will adapt until it is fun again
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
I got this reasoning from YouTube as well. But if that were the reason, then many Youtuber would be gone from the window - or in principle 99% of all Youtuber. There are people who really overdo it with links. We only did that in the newer videos - but not as exaggerated as some others. It doesn't even have to be just in the Caisno scene, but in all industries. I've asked Youtube a couple of times to comment but only standard answers come. I think we made a mistake and that's because we didn't monetize our videos through Youtube. I can't explain it any other way.
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think that they go by the number of complaints there. For example, if you have 10,000 subscribers, then it takes more complaints from users than if you only have 100 subscribers for Youtube to react. And I think also with the subsequent objections it is more difficult with fewer subscribers that the channel is reactivated. Then you get a mail robot in front of you. On the last question I asked Youtube, came only a standard response, which had nothing to do with the question asked.
The story with YT annoys me enormously. Not because of the channel itself, but because I find it unfair. If Youtube would completely say goodbye to gambling, then I would say, well, you have to accept that. I would maybe even think that it's even better that way, because sometimes people get the videos suggested that have nothing to do with gambling and could then possibly get into the gambling addiction. But so I find it simply unfair.
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
you have to look at both to understand why mza holds the toast so demonstratively close to the camera when sharing hahaha really epic
edit: ct is still there or
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well, I've been thinking about this for the last few days and it might have been a positive thing for me. I've been game-free for 2 months and the channel loss somehow supports me in this - at least I currently have the feeling. I've also had a few times in the last year the situation that although I did not want to play, had the feeling, you have to bring a video again, so that the people on Youtube are happy.
Since we play and have played without special Streamer Bonuses, the financial effort to produce an average video was also greater than that we would ever have directly or indirectly through Youtube back in. I'm not so sure about me, since I really pulled myself together the last two years. But for Matthias it was really expensive
I talked to Matthias about it and he also said that he has only had one slip up so far this year and he feels that it might be positive because he has been playing a lot more since GambleJoe than before GambleJoe. And he was playing heavily even before GambleJoe. We both more or less developed a kind of commitment to gamble and both sometimes unconsciously gambled more often than we wanted to in order to satisfy the YouTube community.
Actually, we always wanted to run Youtube only as a side and hobby project and we only wanted to play when we were up for it ourselves. We just thought, if we already gamble, then we just record it and use the videos as a small advertising effect for our portal. But we never wanted to stream because we don't think we're that entertaining and we don't want to give up our privacy. We also don't want to gamble professionally - we don't have to, thank goodness. Unfortunately, it is now so that this - actually honest - concept is no longer so well received by the people since there are the streamers and "professional players" ...
Be that as it may. You are of course also right that we can't put up with this on principle. Therefore we are currently looking for a new concept. However, we do not want to start playing with fake and Bonus money like the others. We will certainly come back at some point. And when we come again, then violently ...
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
MzA and Youtube
Nobody has liked this post so far
something will always change and you will adapt until it is fun again
This post has been translated automatically