-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:36 pm CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
Magnum, today at 11:10 am CEST
-
Magnum, today at 11:05 am CEST
-
RedKaos, today at 11:04 am CEST
-
slotliebe89, today at 10:50 am CEST
-
slotliebe89, today at 10:49 am CEST
-
Patizi, today at 09:54 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, today at 08:31 am CEST
-
TranceBabe, today at 12:42 am CEST
-
Enride87, today at 12:06 am CEST
-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:44 pm CEST
-
Langhans, yesterday at 07:49 pm CEST
-
garfield68, yesterday at 07:26 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, yesterday at 06:46 pm CEST
-
H****2, yesterday at 06:11 pm CEST
-
nightforce1979, yesterday at 01:35 pm CEST
-
Lizzy0805, yesterday at 09:33 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 12th May. 2024 at 11:36 pm CEST
-
Maja80, on 12th May. 2024 at 09:12 pm CEST
-
H****2, on 12th May. 2024 at 09:12 pm CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 12th May. 2024 at 06:25 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 12th May. 2024 at 08:10 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 11th May. 2024 at 11:42 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:32 am CEST
-
gamble1, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:05 am CEST
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post: CashOut, frapi07, Lionking, Marieangels, moody
Everyone can think about it as he wants. I personally don't care how someone sees it. It's just counterproductive when in every thread where it's about reclamation, the same people immediately buzz out to put down the thread creator.
The TE has already decided to initiate a clawback and is asking for information here. The private opinion, how someone sees this morally, helps the TE exactly zero.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Example: Mr. X. has won 10k€ with a 50€ deposit. However, he never paid it out, but gambled it away little by little. Can he claim it back?
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
No. You can only get back directly lost money.
Example: You have paid in 10,000 € and paid out 5,000 €. So you can claim back 5.000 €.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
I thought because it was at least for a while as a credit on the account. So in principle, it is quite simple to see what went in, what went out.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post: CashOut, Lionking, Marieangels, Max_Bet
Exactly. Only the actual total loss is refunded.
This is because there was no legally valid contract and thus there is no valid business agreement. The casino's payouts are already part of your money, so to speak, and the loss is thus illegally retained money. The casino therefore has no right to keep your money and will be obliged to repay you.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
i see exactly the same but if certain contributions are removed / deleted then the whole has nothing to do with freedom of speech but rather with censorship.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hope you do not mean my other post, I deleted it myself because Falke had a better answer.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post: frapi07
No all good, it was not explicitly about your post
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Are any taxes subsequently deducted from the amount claimed? Or from the 40% or 50% that you get back in the end? That would still be the hit, but I could imagine it.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
No. The money paid in is normally already taxed money and you only get your own money back, so to speak.
The process financier has to pay tax on his share, of course, because it is new income for him.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ui
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post: refucs
No, you don't have to pay anything. That's the whole point of a litigation funder, after all.
The litigation financier pays your attorney's fees, any court costs, etc. So he advances the money. The lawyer then gets this money back from the casino, because they have to pay all the costs if they lose.
You just wait for your money to arrive. The lawyer or PF then splits the money right away, so he takes his percentages and transfers the remaining amount to you.
In some cases, you may have to appear in court. The hearing usually lasts only 15 - 30 minutes. But that is all you might have to do. Nothing more. And the hearing always takes place at your place. So you don't have to travel far for the hearing.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
You mean 40% goes to the process financier and 60% to you? That's ok. There are slightly better offers between 30% and 35%, but all contracts are roughly in this range.
This post has been translated automatically