In addition, the topic is immensely annoying. Someone who gets so much money back will continue to gamble this money guaranteed if nothing is done against the addiction
I have unfortunately bottom line also a thick minus but I have long resigned myself to it and pay for my crap I have done wrong and settle my gambling debts... That is a matter of honor!
I have now the days times with the Chargeback dealt. I always ended up at wirholendeingeld.de.
With me it's about online casino bets where I paid with Paypal.
Find but what whdg requires too steep... there would be several thousand euros away
Now I'm on the subject on fb with advertising quasi zugespammt^^
Have you had experience with "Glücksspielhelden.de" or "Charge-back.de"?
Both were suggested to me via Fb advertising, but have found to none of the what.
Believe glückspielhelden.de tries the same as whdg, only in worse
LG
Günni
Hi Günni,
I have read your offer regarding the argumentative writing. Can you send it to me please?
Thanks in advance
can me times please the Argumentier letter send
You can't say that at all. Only because e.g. the Künast because of certain expletives before court not
did not get through, it does not mean that other courts decide likewise. One thinks only times of the penalty catalog
for drivers, what a middle finger, A.....loch etc costs on average. So GJ would now say that you can write with impunity
Swear words on FB with impunity, because a district court has ruled so? I do not understand this logic
There were much worse things written online, even though I'm not a fan of hers, but that's not the subject of my thread
of my thread.
Christof writes a lot, also much with personal opinion, that one should always consider.
In other words, every case is different. Maybe the plaintiff had already had payouts, and the court or the casino had
has argued accordingly. Maybe there were completely different reasons. Maybe only this court has judged so.
To say in general, it would have no value, is in my eyes very daring, because there is no landmark decision so far, and also not at all
can give, since online gambling is illegal
So you have to prove that you didn't know about the illegality. This already falls flat if one had payouts,
or have been paying into casinos for years. At some point, the courts assume that you had to have known about the criminal liability.
I don't do chargebacks, but something like that wouldn't intimidate me. Just because a court once ruled pro casino,
doesn't mean the world. I would also not be surprised that casinos, when they see that they are going to lose in court, back out of the money
Pay out the money and put a confidentiality clause under the plaintiff's nose, so that there are not too many imitators
Copycats. Thus, some sort of out-of-court "deal" would come together.
This would explain why one reads so little about it. I believe very well that the success with some is not at all so bad, and with security
also already some success had
It had already behaved similarly with other court decisions, which one wanted to keep as secret as possible, in order not to have too many imitators.
Ultimately, however, there is no guarantee, and everyone has to weigh it up for themselves whether they want to take this step.
This post has been translated automatically
O****r
Forum posts:3Member has been banned
Money back ?!
22nd Dec. 2019, at 11:29 am CET#34
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
There is a new judgment from the Ulm Regional Court, for the player and against Paypal. It's about 10K. The topic is therefore far from over
Money back ?!
Nobody has liked this post so far
Exactly!
In addition, the topic is immensely annoying. Someone who gets so much money back will continue to gamble this money guaranteed if nothing is done against the addiction
I have unfortunately bottom line also a thick minus but I have long resigned myself to it and pay for my crap I have done wrong and settle my gambling debts... That is a matter of honor!
This post has been translated automatically
Money back ?!
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hi Günni,
I have read your offer regarding the argumentative writing. Can you send it to me please?
Thanks in advance
can me times please the Argumentier letter send
This post has been translated automatically
Money back ?!
Liked this post:
Crazy4U
You can't say that at all. Only because e.g. the Künast because of certain expletives before court not
did not get through, it does not mean that other courts decide likewise. One thinks only times of the penalty catalog
for drivers, what a middle finger, A.....loch etc costs on average. So GJ would now say that you can write with impunity
Swear words on FB with impunity, because a district court has ruled so? I do not understand this logic
There were much worse things written online, even though I'm not a fan of hers, but that's not the subject of my thread
of my thread.
Christof writes a lot, also much with personal opinion, that one should always consider.
In other words, every case is different. Maybe the plaintiff had already had payouts, and the court or the casino had
has argued accordingly. Maybe there were completely different reasons. Maybe only this court has judged so.
To say in general, it would have no value, is in my eyes very daring, because there is no landmark decision so far, and also not at all
can give, since online gambling is illegal
So you have to prove that you didn't know about the illegality. This already falls flat if one had payouts,
or have been paying into casinos for years. At some point, the courts assume that you had to have known about the criminal liability.
I don't do chargebacks, but something like that wouldn't intimidate me. Just because a court once ruled pro casino,
doesn't mean the world. I would also not be surprised that casinos, when they see that they are going to lose in court, back out of the money
Pay out the money and put a confidentiality clause under the plaintiff's nose, so that there are not too many imitators
Copycats. Thus, some sort of out-of-court "deal" would come together.
This would explain why one reads so little about it. I believe very well that the success with some is not at all so bad, and with security
also already some success had
It had already behaved similarly with other court decisions, which one wanted to keep as secret as possible, in order not to have too many imitators.
Ultimately, however, there is no guarantee, and everyone has to weigh it up for themselves whether they want to take this step.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back ?!
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically