Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Casinos with lower RTP? (Page 2)

Topic created on 04th Feb. 2021 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 23 | Views: 5,084
Kleinkariert
Expert
Goeki72 wrote on 04/02/2021 at 22:29: 1% RTP is a hell of a lot because......
There is 25% difference between 4 or 5% house share.

It is a lot, especially because sometimes it can be even 4% and more difference. Then the difference is even 100% i.e. you lose on average twice as much, you can also get good wins in the gaming house with 70-85%. The potential is there for everyone, but a big win then costs significantly more money on average.

Providers can of course adjust the distribution so that you do not notice anything in the base game and simply remove 1-2 wilds from the reels in the feature or you come less often in free spins. Interesannten approach had NoLimit, there the free game purchase cost a bit more.

This post has been translated automatically

ramb00
Amateur

Klempo77 wrote on 04.02.2021 at 12:10 pm: I noticed that some of my "stammcasinos" have now introduced slots with lower RTP.

Leovegas
Sunnyplayer/sunmaker
Westcasino
Slotty Vegas
Videoslots

Checked on play'n'go slots, but assume that other providers have lower RTP.

Maybe you know some more?

Play n Go is mMn. anyway the biggest garbage... most money I have burned there... other slots Win landed, Play n Go largest part gone. Best example is with me Book of Dead... if I bet 3000€ there, stands maximum win 50% (for the most part of course)....


Highlight was last week, about 500 spins not even free spins ^^

Book of Dead is with me in any case on the Blacklist now

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Kleinkariert wrote on 04.02.2021 at 22:45
It is very much, especially because sometimes it can be even 4% and more difference. Then the difference is even 100% i.e. you lose on average twice as much, you can also get good wins in the gambling house with 70-85%. The potential is there for everyone, but a big win then costs significantly more money on average.

Providers can of course adjust the distribution so that you do not notice anything in the base game and simply remove 1-2 wilds from the reels in the feature or you come less often in free spins. Interesannten approach had NoLimit, there the free game purchase cost a bit more.

What I always do not understand, as I said, purely mathematically you are of course absolutely right but where is the factor "gambling"?
Theoretically, it costs twice as much to generate a "Big Win" at a lower RTP but practically, as in my case, I burned more money in casinos with higher RTP than in casinos with lower RTP and also had my "Big Wins" exactly there
I always ask myself why one makes these theoretical calculation games in the area of gambling - for me this is a contradiction in terms
This is also please not to be understood as criticism, because now comes my real question and that simply interests me.
Can you really say you notice a difference if you play BOD with low or high RTP or does it just give you a better feeling to know, theoretically your chances are bigger with higher RTP?

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
one already notices in the discussions here that less is won
BRD works
everything to zero

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
MisterL wrote on 04.02.2021 at 23:04: one notices already in the discussions here that less is won
BRD works
everything to zero

Honestly, I win neither more, nor less than before, because I do not play in these gambling houses and therefore everything is the same for me. 😅

This post has been translated automatically

Goeki72
Experienced
Ok another comparison before I sleep.

Between 90% and 94% RTP is a difference than how to install a second zero on the roulette.

Good night lol

This post has been translated automatically

wettibernd
Expert
Goeki72 wrote on 02/05/2021 at 00:20: Ok another comparison before I sleep.

Between 90% and 94% RTP is a difference than how to install a second zero on the roulette.

Good night lol

Not quite true mathematically but okay. But I think that you can not compare, because in Roulette you play much more strategically and know what you win when you hit, which is not the case with the slot, because everyone hopes for the big hit, so 1000x or more. If it hits you it doesn't matter if the RTP is 94% or 96%, of course it will happen more often with the higher RTP but that doesn't mean it will hit me or you.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
wettibernd wrote on 05.02.2021 at 00:29
Not quite true mathematically but okay. But I think that you can not compare, because in Roulette you play much more strategic and know what you win when you hit, which is not the case in the slot, because everyone hopes for the big hit, so 1000x or more. If it hits you it doesn't matter if the RTP is 94% or 96%, of course it will happen more often with the higher RTP but that doesn't mean it will hit me or you.

I see it similar to Goeki, but I also agree with you. 4 percent (96 percent RTP) is 100 percent revenue for the casino. So if I now lower the RTP to 94 percent, I generate 50 percent more revenue. It doesn't really affect you as a player, because as you say, whether it's 94 percent or even 98 percent RTP - the chance of a big win is similar or stays away forever

This post has been translated automatically

Slothot
Amateur
No, in your example the chance of a big win decreases by a factor of 3.

That would be the effect of an RTP of 98, to 94 percent. Reason enough to wait for the developments. I actually make my game decisions RTP dependent. I have not played PlaynGo for a long time...

This post has been translated automatically

XXLEONIDASXX
Experienced
Slothot wrote on 02/05/2021 at 13:19: No, in your example the chance of a big win decreases by 3 times.

That would be the effect of an RTP of 98, to 94 percent. Reason enough to wait and see the developments. I actually make my game decisions RTP dependent. I haven't played PlaynGo for a long time...

Absolutely right! And you can see that clearly if you play daily like me. There goes much much less than where the RTP was still 3 or 4% higher. You lose in the same period easily triple as before

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd May. 2024 at 12:17 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately