gamble1 wrote on 02.05.2022 at 19:08
Huh for what 3 months of statements when you only deposited 300 ? Did you spread them out over 3 months ? Would prove to them that for the deposits and everything else is the but a shit or do we start now hypothetically think he could yes 1000 in the future Deposit let's see if he has the 1000 he could possibly deposit at all
Merkst itself is bullshit
So bottomless bullshit gibts almost no more that is directly after Sow check after 20 € pretty much the stupidest thing I've heard so far would ask the whether they want the income tax number of your first born one can never know vill zockt he or she in the future times there then they already have a document more
They want to see your bank statements and pay stub to see how much you gamble and if you can afford it, that's the point, not what you have paid into the casino, they know that, but how much you gamble at all.
Eddie wrote on 02.05.2022 at 20:12
They want to see your bank statements and pay stubs to see how much you gamble.And if you can afford it.That's the point, not what you deposited in the casino, they know that, but how much you gamble at all.
Yes they want to know where you got the money to play and you prove it when you make your Deposit
evopower140 wrote on 03.05.2022 at 08:22 clock: I'm curious my Vip Manager from N1 has reported now 3 statements are enough and the last 2 deposits from Skrill I've uploaded times
Dux does not deviate a bissel from the nonsense they want everything and the whole thing because of 300 euros or so and never paid out anything
Do it just with one of the two possibly it is then enough for the other
So now they have found that in a month my salary minus costs would not have been enough now I have to put where the money comes from rental income now they want the contracts gehts still
evopower140 wrote on 04.05.2022 at 15:57 clock: So now they have found that in a month yes my salary minus costs would not have been enough now I have to put where the money comes from rental income now they want the contracts gehts still
Yes and that's it again that can not be one may not submit the data that is prohibited and a violation of applicable DE/EU law on the subject of data protection
You can not force the customer to commit a crime and justify that you have to prove that the customer makes nothing criminal
Apart from that, asking for documents that are forbidden to be handed over can't be seen as a kind of incitement? I think a company must be clear that data from third parties may not be viewed or processed without consent
I mean the chance that someone actually uses illegal funds in the casino is compared to this so vanishingly small that must be noticed by someone and therefore I say yes without a court that shows here times clear limits that will no longer be anything
Edit
The disclosure of personal data to third parties is in principle not permitted without the consent of the persons concerned . If it is permitted in exceptional cases, the data transfer may only take place in encrypted and segregated form. This is to prevent illegal tapping of the data, as well as too much information about a person in a data collection.
And nobody can tell me that there are not people who would send it just like that to get their payout
And exactly therefore it makes me so sour the enterprises must know nevertheless which goes and which not and cannot rely on the fact that the customer will know nevertheless already which documents he may send in and which not
Sure was possibly times a month or so under it where I have possibly more gambled do not count there now on the cent exactly there were but previously also weeks where I had only payout because of the 5 K per week payout because I have 4 week not paid in only paid out evtl would be yes then the money 2 months later from this money can be yes also be
evopower140 wrote on 04.05.2022 at 17:59 clock: Clearly was evtl times a month or so under it where I have evtl more gambled do not count there now on the cent exactly there were but previously also weeks where I had only payout because of the 5 K per week payout there I have 4 week not paid in only paid out evtl would be yes then the money 2 months later from this money can be yes also
Yes, and that's exactly what I mean yes how to keep track of it so it would have to be enough just to prove what you had just as general income and from where
Same thing now with me with MrVegas (aka Videoslots). Have sent filtered bank statement that shows only salary receipt - is not enough ("filtered") and last MasterCard statement and PayPal receipts for the Neosurf card purchases, now they still want checking account statements with all transactions... nope.
Dux advanced verification
Liked this post: Anonym
They want to see your bank statements and pay stub to see how much you gamble and if you can afford it, that's the point, not what you have paid into the casino, they know that, but how much you gamble at all.
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Liked this post: Anonym
Yes they want to know where you got the money to play and you prove it when you make your Deposit
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
Dux deviates no bissel from the nonsense they want everything and the whole because of 300 euros or so and never paid out what
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do it just with one of the two possibly it is then enough for the other
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Liked this post: Anonym
Yes and that's it again that can not be one may not submit the data that is prohibited and a violation of applicable DE/EU law on the subject of data protection
You can not force the customer to commit a crime and justify that you have to prove that the customer makes nothing criminal
Apart from that, asking for documents that are forbidden to be handed over can't be seen as a kind of incitement? I think a company must be clear that data from third parties may not be viewed or processed without consent
I mean the chance that someone actually uses illegal funds in the casino is compared to this so vanishingly small that must be noticed by someone and therefore I say yes without a court that shows here times clear limits that will no longer be anything
Edit
The disclosure of personal data to third parties is in principle not permitted without the consent of the persons concerned . If it is permitted in exceptional cases, the data transfer may only take place in encrypted and segregated form. This is to prevent illegal tapping of the data, as well as too much information about a person in a data collection.
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Liked this post:
dersawen
And exactly therefore it makes me so sour the enterprises must know nevertheless which goes and which not and cannot rely on the fact that the customer will know nevertheless already which documents he may send in and which not
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, and that's exactly what I mean yes how to keep track of it so it would have to be enough just to prove what you had just as general income and from where
This post has been translated automatically
Dux advanced verification
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically