I don't think GJ is cheating people here... what would they get out of it please?
Sure, some people definitely win more often than others in the draw. But if really semi-active or active members are there, which is actually 60-70% always the case, it's fine
Of course, there are always people from whom I have never read anything. But it seems that there are also a few silent readers
Matthias wrote on 18.12.2020 at 12:52 pm
So programmed that of course Counter, but what I can tell you:
It doesn't matter if you log on to GambleJoe at 00:01 in the morning, or not until 17:55.
The RNG starts daily at 18:00 and simply looks in the user database, which user has a timestamp from the current day in the "last-activity" column, at the same time it is still queried whether a total of at least 1000 activity points.
According to this, everyone who has logged in to GambleJoe between 00:00:01 and 17:59:59, and has a total of 1000 activity points, takes part.
We do the drawing as correctly as possible, to the best of our knowledge and belief, and if you don't believe it, don't believe it.
So far clear. Nevertheless, the RNG does have some kind of list of participating people, which is then matched with the DB. And this list will probably be linear?! Since the "simple" RNG follows a simple scheme, the time of logging in would at least not be completely irrelevant. For example, I almost always log in in the morning, but on the day I was drawn I logged in at noon/afternoon, so my ID was at a different position in the login list. Finds also a pity that Counter does not even comment on the RNG, how it is programmed. What is he shying away from?
Begbie wrote on 12/18/2020 at 1:25 pm
Clear as far as it goes. Still, surely the RNG has some sort of list of participating people, which is then matched against the DB. And this list will presumably be linear in nature?! Since the "simple" RNG follows a simple scheme, imho the time of logging in would at least not be completely irrelevant. For example, I almost always log in in the morning, but on the day I was drawn I logged in at noon/afternoon, so my ID was at a different position in the login list. Finds also a pity that Counter does not even comment on the RNG, how it is programmed. What is he shying away from?
since YOU don't know when exactly who went online, just like everyone else doesn't know, you can't take advantage of it. It would be a coincidence... If your thesis would be true and the rng would be soooo bad, one would be able to recognize quite clearly patterns, which I can at least not now. We have both won on the same day which is already felt n miracle lol
Begbie wrote on 12/18/2020 at 1:25 pm
Clear as far as it goes. Nevertheless, surely the RNG has some kind of list of participating people, which is then matched with the DB. And this list will presumably be linear in nature?! Since the "simple" RNG follows a simple scheme, imho the time of logging in would at least not be completely irrelevant. For example, I almost always log in in the morning, but on the day I was drawn I logged in at noon/afternoon, so my ID was at a different position in the login list. Finds also a pity that Counter does not even comment on the RNG, how it is programmed. What is he shying away from?
What is so difficult to understand about it? There is no login list. We simply store the last activity in the user database every time a user logs in. And from this list the wins are drawn via RNG.
And why Counter does not comment? Because he simply has a vacation. The year is coming to an end and he is entitled to a vacation.
We are all human beings, colleagues, we are not machines, not robots and also not cheaters who make fun of giving 10€ more to one than to the other. Such nonsense. The RNG works perfectly, we have demonstrated this in detail with video evidence last year. This year we actually didn't want to comment on it anymore, because there are always people (like you, for example) who don't want to believe us and question our competence.
There is a reason why this self-developed portal runs smoothly and quickly, even with 5-digit user numbers and soon over a quarter of a million forum posts, hundreds of gigabytes of videos and thousands of photos. We know what we are doing.
warennn wrote on 18.12.2020 at 13:31
since YOU don't know when exactly who went online just like everyone else doesn't know, you can't take advantage of it. Say it would be coincidence... If your thesis would be true and the rng would be soooo bad, one would be able to recognize quite clearly patterns, which I can at least not now. We both won on the same day which is already felt n miracle lol
You can't see a pattern? So many multiple hits and as I mentioned before, almost exactly the same sequence as last year, that suggests that the RNG is a simple construct.
Matthias, I am not accusing you of fraud. I also think such an accusation is bullshit. You don't need to construct a global portal mistrust out of it. I'm just interested in the technical side of it. Gladly Counter can express itself also via PM in addition.
Matthias wrote on 12/18/2020 at 1:32 pm
What's so hard to understand about this? There is no login list. We simply save the last activity in the user database every time you log in. And from this list, the wins are then drawn via RNG.
And why Counter does not comment? Because he simply has a vacation. The year is coming to an end and he is entitled to a vacation.
We are all human beings, colleagues, we are not machines, not robots and also not cheaters who make fun of giving 10€ more to one than to the other. Such nonsense. The RNG works perfectly, we have demonstrated this in detail with video evidence last year. This year we actually didn't want to comment on it anymore, because there are always people (like you, for example) who don't want to believe us and question our competence.
There is a reason why this self-developed portal runs smoothly and quickly, even with 5-digit user numbers and soon over a quarter of a million forum posts, hundreds of gigabytes of videos and thousands of photos. We know what we are doing.
i have a suggestion for improvement for upcoming actions...
i like criticism, don't want to undermine it as long as it is constructive and the decisions of the operator are accepted. if nevertheless again and again certain specialists are of the opinion to be able to do it better and persist on this point of view, despite several requests, it would be only fair that these parties take the money in their own hands, use their rng generator of trust and no longer participate in the GJ lotteries. you will have your peace, the people who are just happy about it will get a chance to slide into their place and the naggers can puke about their own spagetti code.
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post:
Sarkasto, 
Shox2k17
Sure, some people definitely win more often than others in the draw. But if really semi-active or active members are there, which is actually 60-70% always the case, it's fine
Of course, there are always people from whom I have never read anything. But it seems that there are also a few silent readers
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Points you collect for your activity.
Casino reviews, uploading pictures, uploading videos, logging in, posting etc
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
to add, you have 46,568..can see in your profile under your avatar...
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
So far clear. Nevertheless, the RNG does have some kind of list of participating people, which is then matched with the DB. And this list will probably be linear?! Since the "simple" RNG follows a simple scheme, the time of logging in would at least not be completely irrelevant. For example, I almost always log in in the morning, but on the day I was drawn I logged in at noon/afternoon, so my ID was at a different position in the login list. Finds also a pity that Counter does not even comment on the RNG, how it is programmed. What is he shying away from?
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
since YOU don't know when exactly who went online, just like everyone else doesn't know, you can't take advantage of it. It would be a coincidence... If your thesis would be true and the rng would be soooo bad, one would be able to recognize quite clearly patterns, which I can at least not now. We have both won on the same day which is already felt n miracle lol
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post:
ruhrpott
What is so difficult to understand about it? There is no login list. We simply store the last activity in the user database every time a user logs in. And from this list the wins are drawn via RNG.
And why Counter does not comment? Because he simply has a vacation. The year is coming to an end and he is entitled to a vacation.
We are all human beings, colleagues, we are not machines, not robots and also not cheaters who make fun of giving 10€ more to one than to the other. Such nonsense. The RNG works perfectly, we have demonstrated this in detail with video evidence last year. This year we actually didn't want to comment on it anymore, because there are always people (like you, for example) who don't want to believe us and question our competence.
There is a reason why this self-developed portal runs smoothly and quickly, even with 5-digit user numbers and soon over a quarter of a million forum posts, hundreds of gigabytes of videos and thousands of photos. We know what we are doing.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can't see a pattern? So many multiple hits and as I mentioned before, almost exactly the same sequence as last year, that suggests that the RNG is a simple construct.
Matthias, I am not accusing you of fraud. I also think such an accusation is bullshit. You don't need to construct a global portal mistrust out of it. I'm just interested in the technical side of it. Gladly Counter can express itself also via PM in addition.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
That's what I mean by login list
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post:
Matthias, 
palme7777
i have a suggestion for improvement for upcoming actions...
i like criticism, don't want to undermine it as long as it is constructive and the decisions of the operator are accepted. if nevertheless again and again certain specialists are of the opinion to be able to do it better and persist on this point of view, despite several requests, it would be only fair that these parties take the money in their own hands, use their rng generator of trust and no longer participate in the GJ lotteries. you will have your peace, the people who are just happy about it will get a chance to slide into their place and the naggers can puke about their own spagetti code.
This post has been translated automatically