Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Wildz: Verification is no longer serious (Page 2)

Topic created on 19th Feb. 2021 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 18 | Views: 4,133
killpart
Rookie
So Wildz has also required the asset certificate from me, was with wildz and Caxino even in the VIP program, have now deleted all 3 accounts.
Somewhere the fun of the proofs also stops.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert
killpart wrote on 16.04.2021 at 11:15 am: So from me Wildz has also required the asset certificate, was with wildz and Caxino even in the VIP program, have now deleted all 3 accounts.
Somewhere the fun of the proofs also stops.

Very good

Have also deleted my account at Frank Casino as the have required.

Everyone should do this. No longer play in any casino that requires such documents

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Falcon wrote on 04/16/2021 at 11:20 AM
Very good

Also deleted my account at Frank Casino when they asked for it.

Everyone should do this. No longer play in any casino that requires such documents.

But that's what almost everyone wants right now and it certainly won't get any better

Why there is such a fuss is also not quite clear to me because everyone in the EU can spend money where he wants

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
I still remember that they are allowed to ask for proof of assets from 2000 €/according to MGA
may require. If these come together in a few months, I am naturally surprised
of course, if then suddenly the hammer comes and I perhaps evenly only e.g
200 deposited. I think they see it in terms of the year. I have it somewhere
in the clipboard.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert
gamble1 wrote on 04/16/2021 at 17:42
But that's what almost everyone wants currently and it certainly won't get any better

Why there is such a fuss is not quite clear to me because everyone in the EU can spend money where he wants to

That demand by far not all. And even if, it does not make it better. What comes next? Sending health data there? What would have been completely absurd two years ago is now almost reality. And that's precisely because everyone is going along with it. Either you have principles and stand by them, or you bow to them. But then you can't complain if you find out later that life might not be so comfortable after all because the citizen is becoming completely transparent.


And the fact that the casinos that require something like that usually only then require When a payout is pending is another issue. And then even refuse the payout should not send them highly personal data. This is blackmail, nothing else.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I agree with the last point, Falke.
If the data is requested in advance, everyone is free to decide.
However, if a big win stands between exposure and renunciation, it is morally questionable.
For example, I would have no problem submitting a salary statement, complete account data? No.

Frank had also asked me that once, as well as drift. I wrote to B3iden, they should please look at the win/lose statistics at avento, then the topic was through

This post has been translated automatically

needle34
Expert
This is completely normal. Meanwhile

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
well man good that I am with Wildz and Caxino already for months there away.Mir and my wife are on the phone so cheeky come, since I have there immediately my account deregistered.Just because my wife went to the phone when it rang and she told them, please wait I get my husband on the phone, but said smoothly away this Tüpi, what my wife would have to look at my phone, and she should refrain in the future, finally, this phone number would be stored at Wildz on the name of her husband, and I would have nothing to look at it, this phone must always be immediately accessible to her husband, if we as business partners with her husband would have something to discuss.My wife has this of course not put up with, and neatly on the phone the opinion gegeicht.als I went on the phone then, I got the same cheeky plump kind of those to feel, but I was so p**sed off that I asked this Tüpi times really, if he had shit badly, and that it is him a scheissdreck concern who phones with my phone or accepts a call.wie said, have my account there block and ready.these casinos are in my eyes, the very very last dirt

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Falke wrote on 16.04.2021 at 19:15
Not everyone is asking for that by a long shot. And even if they do, that doesn't make it any better. What's next? Sending health data there? What would have been completely absurd two years ago is now almost reality. And that's precisely because everyone is going along with it. Either you have principles and stand by them, or you bow to them. But then you can't complain if you find out later that life might not be so comfortable after all because the citizen is becoming completely transparent.


And the fact that the casinos that require something like that usually only then require When a payout is pending is another issue. And then even refuse the payout should not send them highly personal data. This is blackmail, nothing else.

The problem is the same as with the other regulations that someone decides but no one really wants to

It will never come to the fact that all persons refrain from a thing only because it is questionable there would also still be people who send in a stool sample if it is demanded do you understand what I mean?

And only if strictly all people speak against a thing and really no one makes there with only then is the consumer again in the position that one is heard because if the coal breaks away then one can make everything quite easily undone

But you will never see that and it does not matter which topic it is animal welfare or gambling laws or or or

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 04:43 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately