Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Lapalingo: [solved] 25000 € payout denied!!! (Page 2)

Topic created on 20th Jun. 2020 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 15 | Views: 3,762
Wyoooktz
redfoxx wrote on 06/21/2020 at 2:57 pm
"should" not be done. right. but the TE is right: then equal right for all. either the account is inadmissible (for whatever reason) and accordingly not authorized to make any transaction of a financial nature.

or the account is classified as capable of payment and action and this can then not only apply to one direction

this is a double standard and definitely not legitimate, serious or factually/argumentatively comprehensible in any way

i'm always amazed that other players' responses to such incidents almost always have a casino-inclined, "self-blame" tone. as if the non-payment was legal. it is NOT in the case of previously accepted deposits. no matter what else is written in the terms and conditions. i think it's really time that this (often tacit) acceptance of such business practices stopped


I can still do nothing or ? if tomorrow they say "no can not"

Habe yes net Ma Einzahl Bonus with the accounts used at the time were only registered by my ex husband... for whatever reason

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
redfoxx wrote on 06/21/2020 at 2:57 pm
"should" not be done. right. but the TE is right: then equal right for all. either the account is inadmissible (for whatever reason) and accordingly not authorized to make any transaction of a financial nature.

or the account is classified as capable of payment and action and this can then not only apply to one direction

this is a double standard and definitely not legitimate, serious or factually/argumentatively comprehensible in any way

i'm always amazed that other players' responses to such incidents almost always have a casino-inclined, "self-blame" tone. as if the non-payment was legal. it is NOT in the case of previously accepted deposits. no matter what else is written in the terms and conditions. i think it's really time that this (often tacit) acceptance of such business practices stopped


You can of course veruschen to come on the track that all transactions are contested but Lapalingo will then argue that just then a random check is made and it is only noticed

This post has been translated automatically

Wyoooktz
gamble1 wrote on 21.06.2020 at 15:18
You can of course veruschen to come on the track that all transactions are contested but Lapalingo will then argue that just then a random check is made and it is only noticed

Have sent last year new documents for the purpose of address change, it was about 3500 € ... also paid out without problems.

It's not just about the payout but that I want to continue playing there.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
If they don't pay you the money but open your account again, then you would continue to play there?
Then you really can't be helped.

This post has been translated automatically

Wyoooktz
upola wrote on 21.06.2020 at 15:51: If they do not pay you the money but reopen your account, then you would continue to play there`?
Then you really can't be helped.

I think this superfluous question answers itself? I think you know how it is meant!

This post has been translated automatically

Caro
Expert
After the thread creator had multiple accounts at Lapalingo, he was denied the win/payout. Unfortunately, I have no feedback from the thread creator and will therefore close the topic.

This topic was closed

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics11th May. 2024 at 05:57 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately