At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 10:34 pm CET#44
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
RebellYell wrote on 10/28/2020 at 10:13 pm
I am supposed to
- Salary statement (where address of employer is well read)
- Bank statements
- Selfie with ID and note in hand
Send. Because of 29 euros? Sometime is also good. They already have my current ID and current invoice. If we were talking about several hundred euros, I would certainly do that.
Because of the sum. No.. Money is written off and good.
Would you really submit/do it all because of such an amount from a gift bonus?
No, I wouldn't. But maybe I tick there also generally differently, because I would give such an amount probably not at all to the disbursement
I have at Online Casinos always so a certain basic concern about problems with withdrawals. So if I give a payout in order then I already adjust to it and then I would do that. However, I have been really lucky so far and have never been treated unfairly. Verification has so far always worked without problems even without service charge statements. In the meantime, I only play at Videoslots, Wildz and various No Account Casinos, where everything always goes smoothly anyway
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 11:05 pm CET#46
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 28.10.2020 at 22:03: Only times briefly thrown in and then directly slid out again from the thread: It would be absolutely against the law to deny an unemployed person on benefits the right to participate in gambling
Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities
Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is but just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.
@Knochen, I must agree with you completely.
Considering to filter out the benefit recipients is presumptuous and also against the law.
The salary certificate is rather to avoid money laundering, or to stop.
I find that simply exaggerated. On the day where there is Harz 4, the gaming arcades are fullest and against it is also not proceeded. If someone deposits larger sums, then that's fine, but Lapalingo seems to pull this through with everyone who requests a withdrawal. Somewhere the casino shoots itself just ne bullet in the leg. Anyone who reads this will now certainly no longer invest his money at Lapalingo
Whereby it would be complete nonsense to suspect money laundering at 29, - Euro. ^^
Perhaps it is however in such a way angedacht on the part of the state not to exclude the benefit recipients generally (since against the law) from the gambling, to make it for you however in the long run with the demand for a salary proof more heavily. This would also have a psychological component. One would constantly have the feeling that in the background exactly is registered, how high possible wins turn out or one feels due to the performed "oath of disclosure" rather forced to report perhaps high wins now nevertheless as legally prescribed. Something that might have been omitted before
I hope it's not like that, but it does make you wonder
Believe but in this case rather that Lapalingo has decided there arbitrarily to require proof of salary. Simply because they can. No matter how high the win is
Here someone once threw something about benefit recipients into the room and everyone immediately jumps up? I claim it has nothing at all to do with it. If someone receives Hartz IV, he could probably just send the notice and that would be fine
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
29th Oct. 2020, at 12:33 am CET#50
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Saphira wrote on 28.10.2020 at 23:22: Whereas it would be complete nonsense to suspect money laundering at 29,- Euro. ^^
Perhaps it is however in such a way thought of on the part of the state not to exclude the benefit recipients generally (since against the law) from gambling, but to make it more difficult for you in the long run with the demand for a salary proof. This would also have a psychological component. One would constantly have the feeling that in the background exactly is registered, how high possible wins turn out or one feels due to the performed "oath of disclosure" rather forced to report perhaps high wins now nevertheless as legally prescribed. Something that might have been omitted before
I hope it's not like that, but it does make you wonder
Believe but in this case rather that Lapalingo has decided there arbitrarily to require proof of salary. Simply because they can. No matter how high the win is
If it should have been money laundering, I would have had to have deposited money. Otherwise I would have been money laundering for the casino, since I played with the Bonus money of the casino ^^
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
29th Oct. 2020, at 12:35 am CET#51
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 29.10.2020 at 00:05: Here once someone threw something about benefit recipients in the room and everyone immediately jumps up? I claim it has nothing at all to do with it. If someone receives Hartz IV, he could probably just send the notice and that would be fine.
That's exactly what I think. It has absolutely nothing to do with it
This post has been translated automatically
T****s
Forum posts:388Member has been banned
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
29th Oct. 2020, at 01:20 am CET#52
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can also just send it because, just imagine you win 10,000 euros then you have the Verification with proof of salary already behind you.
Somehow contradictory of yourself because, at 29 euros do not do it but at a higher sum probably...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
29th Oct. 2020, at 03:25 am CET#53
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
lapalingo is again such a bad example. with me they already wanted various proofs when depositing because of nem bonus
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
No, I wouldn't. But maybe I tick there also generally differently, because I would give such an amount probably not at all to the disbursement
I have at Online Casinos always so a certain basic concern about problems with withdrawals. So if I give a payout in order then I already adjust to it and then I would do that. However, I have been really lucky so far and have never been treated unfairly. Verification has so far always worked without problems even without service charge statements. In the meantime, I only play at Videoslots, Wildz and various No Account Casinos, where everything always goes smoothly anyway
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
sippi
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
@Knochen, I must agree with you completely.
Considering to filter out the benefit recipients is presumptuous and also against the law.
The salary certificate is rather to avoid money laundering, or to stop.
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
sippi
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
RiverSong
Perhaps it is however in such a way angedacht on the part of the state not to exclude the benefit recipients generally (since against the law) from the gambling, to make it for you however in the long run with the demand for a salary proof more heavily. This would also have a psychological component. One would constantly have the feeling that in the background exactly is registered, how high possible wins turn out or one feels due to the performed "oath of disclosure" rather forced to report perhaps high wins now nevertheless as legally prescribed. Something that might have been omitted before
I hope it's not like that, but it does make you wonder
Believe but in this case rather that Lapalingo has decided there arbitrarily to require proof of salary. Simply because they can. No matter how high the win is
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Liked this post:
RebellYell, T****s
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
If it should have been money laundering, I would have had to have deposited money. Otherwise I would have been money laundering for the casino, since I played with the Bonus money of the casino ^^
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
That's exactly what I think. It has absolutely nothing to do with it
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
Somehow contradictory of yourself because, at 29 euros do not do it but at a higher sum probably...
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically