At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 02:19 pm CET#34
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
i contacted customer support again today via email to see if they would stick with this insane demand for such documents, at the value of 29 euros (which was achieved without a deposit).
This answer I copy times here purely and leave this better uncommented. I can only EVERY advise, from now on the fingers of this casino to leave!
Good day,
we are serious about this and we stick to it.
The more people know about it, the better it is, then many are prepared and we can process these matters faster.
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 03:29 pm CET#35
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
According to supporter Sabri S.: The more people know about these practices, the more should delete their accounts.
The guy had also confirmed my deletion today.
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 04:44 pm CET#36
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
just thinking.
what if lapa wants to filter out those who receive state aid (any kind of aid is meant)? because these will, no matter whether a few € or a few thousand € win probably not have success in any oc with proof of salary. and that should be quite a few, not only here.
maybe Lapalingo already knows more than other oc? --> maybe from next year on, benefit recipients will be generally excluded from participating in oc? (which of course contradicts another principle).
fact is, by the exact data collection who what how much and where has paid in and out is every cent so everything exactly evident and this info will certainly be forwarded to appropriate bodies
it doesn't concern me, but what acceptable reason could there be as an oc for a few euros to demand proof of salary and thus to take on a targeted shitstorm with lots of voluntary acc closures? they hardly do something like that because they just want to harm themselves.
the answer and your assumptions interested me times
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 28.10.2020 at 16:44: just thinking.
what if lapa want to filter out those who receive state aid (any kind of aid is meant)? because these will, no matter whether a few € or a few thousand € win probably not succeed in any oc with proof of salary. and that should be quite a few, not only here.
maybe Lapalingo already knows more than other oc? --> maybe from next year on, benefit recipients will be generally excluded from participating in oc? (which of course contradicts another principle).
fact is, by the exact data collection who what how much and where has paid in and out is every cent so everything exactly evident and this info will certainly be forwarded to appropriate bodies
it doesn't concern me, but what acceptable reason could there be as an oc for a few euros to demand proof of salary and thus to take on a targeted shitstorm with lots of voluntary acc closures? they hardly do something like that because they just want to harm themselves.
the answer and your assumptions interested me times
Well, that is a good question. Especially since the administrative costs could soon be higher than the 29 euros. 😂
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 05:33 pm CET#38
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 28.10.2020 at 16:44: just thinking.
what if lapa want to filter out those who receive state aid (any kind of aid is meant)? because these will, no matter whether a few € or a few thousand € win probably not succeed in any oc with proof of salary. and that should be quite a few, not only here.
maybe Lapalingo already knows more than other oc? --> maybe from next year on, benefit recipients will be generally excluded from participating in oc? (which of course contradicts another principle).
fact is, by the exact data collection who what how much and where has paid in and out is every cent so everything exactly evident and this info will certainly be forwarded to appropriate bodies
it doesn't concern me, but what acceptable reason could there be as an oc for a few euros to demand proof of salary and thus to take on a targeted shitstorm with lots of voluntary acc closures? they hardly do something like that because they just want to harm themselves.
the answer and your assumptions interested me times
What does a casino have to do with knowing who receives state aid and who doesn't? They couldn't care less, could they?
In addition, who receives certain aid must already disclose all accounts and about the data comparison of the authorities nothing remains hidden. In addition, if there is a uniform database of all players next year, the state will also have access to the data. At the latest then they would fly up the cheat there or what want to hide or? Why should Lapalingo now want to collect data?
Therefore, your thought is COMPLETELY absurd. Especially since I the percentage of those who receive these services and play in the very low percentage are to be settled. And since a casino should consciously accept this and thus scare away all players with these strange things that now demand?
In addition, there is a lot of state aid, to which you allude, where such wins and incoming payments do not represent any problems, only with a state aid and that is ALG2/Grundsicherung
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 10:03 pm CET#42
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Only times briefly thrown in and then directly again herausgeslidet from the thread: It would be absolutely unlawful to deny an unemployed person on benefits the right to participate in gambling
Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities
Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is but just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
28th Oct. 2020, at 10:13 pm CET#43
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 28.10.2020 at 22:03: Only times briefly thrown in and then directly slid out again from the thread: It would be absolutely against the law to deny an unemployed person on benefits the right to participate in gambling
Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities
Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.
I shall
- Salary statement (where the employer's address is clearly visible)
- Bank statements
- Selfie with ID and note in hand
Send. Because of 29 euros? Sometime is also good. They already have my current ID and current invoice. If we were talking about several hundred euros, I would certainly do that.
Because of the sum. No.. Money is written off and good.
Would you really submit/do it all because of such an amount from a bonus?
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
This answer I copy times here purely and leave this better uncommented. I can only EVERY advise, from now on the fingers of this casino to leave!
Good day,
we are serious about this and we stick to it.
The more people know about it, the better it is, then many are prepared and we can process these matters faster.
With kind regards,
Sabri S, Lapalingo Support Team
Customer Service Team D
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
The guy had also confirmed my deletion today.
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
what if lapa wants to filter out those who receive state aid (any kind of aid is meant)? because these will, no matter whether a few € or a few thousand € win probably not have success in any oc with proof of salary. and that should be quite a few, not only here.
maybe Lapalingo already knows more than other oc? --> maybe from next year on, benefit recipients will be generally excluded from participating in oc? (which of course contradicts another principle).
fact is, by the exact data collection who what how much and where has paid in and out is every cent so everything exactly evident and this info will certainly be forwarded to appropriate bodies
it doesn't concern me, but what acceptable reason could there be as an oc for a few euros to demand proof of salary and thus to take on a targeted shitstorm with lots of voluntary acc closures? they hardly do something like that because they just want to harm themselves.
the answer and your assumptions interested me times
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Liked this post:
RebellYell
Well, that is a good question. Especially since the administrative costs could soon be higher than the 29 euros. 😂
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
What does a casino have to do with knowing who receives state aid and who doesn't? They couldn't care less, could they?
In addition, who receives certain aid must already disclose all accounts and about the data comparison of the authorities nothing remains hidden. In addition, if there is a uniform database of all players next year, the state will also have access to the data. At the latest then they would fly up the cheat there or what want to hide or? Why should Lapalingo now want to collect data?
Therefore, your thought is COMPLETELY absurd. Especially since I the percentage of those who receive these services and play in the very low percentage are to be settled. And since a casino should consciously accept this and thus scare away all players with these strange things that now demand?
In addition, there is a lot of state aid, to which you allude, where such wins and incoming payments do not represent any problems, only with a state aid and that is ALG2/Grundsicherung
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
And the money what flöten goes, in which you now scare away players who would otherwise have played there
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
They are a governmental, executive body, so
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
Right, that's what it said at the beginning of this funny email
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
Believe rather it goes with Lapalingo around what else. What some here somehow forget is that according to mga statutes casinos are obliged to verify the source of income of players to ensure that the money does not come from illegal activities
Of course, this is complete nonsense with a €29 payout and a no Deposit bonus, but Lapalingo is simply making use of applicable law here. So all the excitement will bring nothing. Either write off the payout or just send in proof of salary. Where I also really do not understand what is so bad about it. I mean we all hand over sensitive data to the casinos and somehow rely on the fact that they will be safe and that everything is correct, because we have no other choice. If it is now so that you can no longer gamble without proof of salary is but just another verification. I understand that you actually want to be in the right. But you can't win that fight either. So RebelYell, just send them a proof and that's it. Nothing can happen.
This post has been translated automatically
At Lapalingo with 10 euro bonus won a small amount and then it went......
Nobody has liked this post so far
I shall
- Salary statement (where the employer's address is clearly visible)
- Bank statements
- Selfie with ID and note in hand
Send. Because of 29 euros? Sometime is also good. They already have my current ID and current invoice. If we were talking about several hundred euros, I would certainly do that.
Because of the sum. No.. Money is written off and good.
Would you really submit/do it all because of such an amount from a bonus?
This post has been translated automatically