Topic created on 18th Jul. 2019 | Page: 2 of 4 | Answers: 34 | Views: 7,101
Anonym
Former Member
2900 € will not be paid
23rd Jul. 2019, at 05:33 pm CEST#11
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Seniorfips wrote on 23/07/2019 at 17:28: If you already have to play with bonus, you should just take 5min to read the terms and conditions. If one has no desire to spend 5min for it, one should just play without bonus. It should be clear that every company wants to make as much win as possible...
Exactly, generally should! One should always read terms and conditions to avoid disadvantages
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
2900 € will not be paid
23rd Jul. 2019, at 05:37 pm CEST#12
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Anyone who thinks that casinos are charities or that they have anything to give away should wake up or stop putting money into them
Who has problems with the terms and conditions of a casino, because he has no desire, RTL is more interesting, the girlfriend is annoying or the dog must go out the door, let it be, or look for a casino, which AGBs are indifferent. In Curacao are some resident, the whistle on terms and conditions, just as a tip.
The range of Online Casinos is huge, there will be something for everyone.
Oh, it goes on here now.
Here in the forum are a few experts who just think you do not have to read any terms and conditions.
And they repeat that over and over again.
And here you can see what comes out if you do not read.
But of course, the casino is to blame for the fact that they have a general terms and conditions at all.... You do not need something like that.
Tell me, how stupid do you have to be?
No one said here that you don't have to read the terms and conditions.
The point is that terms and conditions at casinos are usually interpreted so that the customer thereby an extreme
Disadvantage arise. That is yet indisputable. Just as indisputable is that these terms and conditions are immoral, and before any
Court would hold!
Quote Wikipedia:
General terms and conditions have the effect that the conclusion of the contract is simplified, accelerated and standardized by a pre-formulated set of clauses. They can regulate in the law of obligations new contract types not provided for in the law. As a rule, they change the distribution of Risk provided for in the law and liability frequently in favor of the user (liability clauses) and make it easier for the user to execute the contract. Therein lies at the same time the danger that the user, usually a entrepreneur, who is economically stronger and commercially more experienced, can enforce unilateral and/or surprising regulations opposite a consumer, which depart too far from valuations of the law. Therefore, there is a need to subject general terms and conditions to a control and to deny certain clauses the legal effectiveness. While this was originally left by the BGB to the jurisdiction, which could declare individual clauses null and void if they were immoral, the legislator created specific regulations for the handling of general terms and conditions through the law regulating the law of general terms and conditions (AGB law), which came into force on April 1, 1977. The Act on the Modernization of the Law of Obligations repealed the General Terms and Conditions Act again; its provisions were incorporated into the German Civil Code with effect from January 1, 2002, with only minor changes (sections 305-310 of the German Civil Code).
And who defends this shit on still or says, the people are still themselves at it to blame, has no more all lath at the fence!
In addition, the terms and conditions can be changed at any time. So they could theoretically be changed BEFORE your payout,
that you get nothing. Whether you have read the before, is completely irrelevant!
And who does not get it that the terms and conditions of the casinos are designed only to NOT pay out money to customers, which is in the 1st class
departed. And the great MGA helps a shit, they support the whole still!
These whole Drecks-AGB have zero existence. They are almost all immoral! They are only "valid" because Malta is 2.400km away, and hardly
hardly a gambler can afford a lawsuit, or that drags on for years. The casinos know that, and that's why they continue to do so.
And instead of seeing what they have for Assi-AGB, is still rumgehackt on the people who are supposedly so stupid, and on page
23 of the terms and conditions have overlooked something. Or because their English was not good enough.
And that is still condemned here, by super smart players like Upola and Co.
upola wrote on 23/07/2019 at 17:59: Oh,is it going on here now.
Here on the forum are a few experts,who just think you don't have to read T&Cs.
And they repeat that over and over again.
And here you can see what comes out if you do not read.
But of course, the casino is to blame for the fact that they have a general terms and conditions at all.... You do not need something like that.
You do not see what comes out of it, but by the important information is mentioned only once there and you are never confronted with it again during the game. The player should be important features such as Max. Bet or illegal games are marked again additionally, some sites have a huge list of banned games and always match which game you may not play now is more than annoying.
Therefore, I do not play on such sites at all with bonus, I am simply the opinion that a T&C a company (even a casino) does not make angels. Sometimes the terms and conditions are not clear and sometimes important things are obscured, I am quite clearly confessing that important information must always be repeated extra for the benefit of the player.
If the terms and conditions state that you have to wager 5 times your Deposit if the casino requires it, then you can still be annoyed that you have to wager 5 times your deposit because the casino requires it. Just because it is in the terms and conditions does not mean that it is a fair rule. It's not about people not informing themselves, but why the terms and conditions are structured as it is currently the case. After all, the people in DE are not as drauf as you and have recognized that important information must always be presented separately.
I personally recommend everyone to read through the terms and conditions, but I do not praise the terms and conditions of the casinos and understand if someone feels deceived by it.
Kleinkariert wrote on 07/23/2019 at 18:23
You don't see what comes about by this, but by the fact that important information is mentioned only once there and you are never confronted with it again during the game. The player should be important features such as Max. Bet or prohibited games are marked again additionally, some sites have a huge list of prohibited games and always match which game you may not play now is more than annoying.
Therefore, I do not play on such sites at all with bonus, I am simply the opinion that a T&C a company (even a casino) does not make angels. Sometimes the terms and conditions are not clear and sometimes important things are obscured, I am quite clearly confessing that important information must always be repeated extra for the benefit of the player.
If the terms and conditions state that you have to wager 5 times your Deposit if the casino requires it, then you can still be annoyed that you have to wager 5 times your deposit because the casino requires it. Just because it is in the terms and conditions does not mean that it is a fair rule. It is not at all about the fact that people do not inform themselves, but why the terms and conditions are structured as it is currently the case. After all, the people in DE are not as drauf as you and have recognized that important information must always be presented separately.
I personally recommend everyone to read through the terms and conditions, but I do not praise the terms and conditions of the casinos and understand if someone feels deceived by it.
I do not praise the terms and conditions, and I do not always find the terms and conditions ok.
But the casinos have now times the terms and conditions, and we do not change anything, whether we find the now good or not.
And the terms and conditions you have to read, just like you and I do it... who does not want that should not play
And also blue and capriz read the terms and conditions.
2900 € will not be paid
Liked this post: Anonym
Exactly, generally should! One should always read terms and conditions to avoid disadvantages
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Liked this post: Anonym
Who has problems with the terms and conditions of a casino, because he has no desire, RTL is more interesting, the girlfriend is annoying or the dog must go out the door, let it be, or look for a casino, which AGBs are indifferent. In Curacao are some resident, the whistle on terms and conditions, just as a tip.
The range of Online Casinos is huge, there will be something for everyone.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
Here in the forum are a few experts who just think you do not have to read any terms and conditions.
And they repeat that over and over again.
And here you can see what comes out if you do not read.
But of course, the casino is to blame for the fact that they have a general terms and conditions at all.... You do not need something like that.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym,
gagapapamama, 
Max183
No one said here that you don't have to read the terms and conditions.
The point is that terms and conditions at casinos are usually interpreted so that the customer thereby an extreme
Disadvantage arise. That is yet indisputable. Just as indisputable is that these terms and conditions are immoral, and before any
Court would hold!
Quote Wikipedia:
General terms and conditions have the effect that the conclusion of the contract is simplified, accelerated and standardized by a pre-formulated set of clauses. They can regulate in the law of obligations new contract types not provided for in the law. As a rule, they change the distribution of Risk provided for in the law and liability frequently in favor of the user (liability clauses) and make it easier for the user to execute the contract. Therein lies at the same time the danger that the user, usually a entrepreneur, who is economically stronger and commercially more experienced, can enforce unilateral and/or surprising regulations opposite a consumer, which depart too far from valuations of the law. Therefore, there is a need to subject general terms and conditions to a control and to deny certain clauses the legal effectiveness. While this was originally left by the BGB to the jurisdiction, which could declare individual clauses null and void if they were immoral, the legislator created specific regulations for the handling of general terms and conditions through the law regulating the law of general terms and conditions (AGB law), which came into force on April 1, 1977. The Act on the Modernization of the Law of Obligations repealed the General Terms and Conditions Act again; its provisions were incorporated into the German Civil Code with effect from January 1, 2002, with only minor changes (sections 305-310 of the German Civil Code).
And who defends this shit on still or says, the people are still themselves at it to blame, has no more all lath at the fence!
In addition, the terms and conditions can be changed at any time. So they could theoretically be changed BEFORE your payout,
that you get nothing. Whether you have read the before, is completely irrelevant!
And who does not get it that the terms and conditions of the casinos are designed only to NOT pay out money to customers, which is in the 1st class
departed. And the great MGA helps a shit, they support the whole still!
These whole Drecks-AGB have zero existence. They are almost all immoral! They are only "valid" because Malta is 2.400km away, and hardly
hardly a gambler can afford a lawsuit, or that drags on for years. The casinos know that, and that's why they continue to do so.
And instead of seeing what they have for Assi-AGB, is still rumgehackt on the people who are supposedly so stupid, and on page
23 of the terms and conditions have overlooked something. Or because their English was not good enough.
And that is still condemned here, by super smart players like Upola and Co.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
You do not see what comes out of it, but by the important information is mentioned only once there and you are never confronted with it again during the game. The player should be important features such as Max. Bet or illegal games are marked again additionally, some sites have a huge list of banned games and always match which game you may not play now is more than annoying.
Therefore, I do not play on such sites at all with bonus, I am simply the opinion that a T&C a company (even a casino) does not make angels. Sometimes the terms and conditions are not clear and sometimes important things are obscured, I am quite clearly confessing that important information must always be repeated extra for the benefit of the player.
If the terms and conditions state that you have to wager 5 times your Deposit if the casino requires it, then you can still be annoyed that you have to wager 5 times your deposit because the casino requires it. Just because it is in the terms and conditions does not mean that it is a fair rule. It's not about people not informing themselves, but why the terms and conditions are structured as it is currently the case. After all, the people in DE are not as drauf as you and have recognized that important information must always be presented separately.
I personally recommend everyone to read through the terms and conditions, but I do not praise the terms and conditions of the casinos and understand if someone feels deceived by it.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
When the gentleman has distributed brains, you have probably missed.
You can still write so lande treatises, who does not read the terms and conditions may not be surprised if he gets problems.
And what is really shabby...if here people do not get their money because they have not read the terms and conditions, then they also pretend to pity.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
So much for the brain!
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
I do not praise the terms and conditions, and I do not always find the terms and conditions ok.
But the casinos have now times the terms and conditions, and we do not change anything, whether we find the now good or not.
And the terms and conditions you have to read, just like you and I do it... who does not want that should not play
And also blue and capriz read the terms and conditions.
This post has been translated automatically
2900 € will not be paid
Nobody has liked this post so far
What I have and you don't.
This post has been translated automatically