Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Duxcasino: Duxcasino refuses requested check up and insight into data processing (Page 3)

Topic created on 30th Jan. 2022 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 29 | Views: 5,279
Stromberg
Legend
tequiero wrote on 01/31/2022 at 11:32 AM
I don't think it would be particularly complicated. Hypothetically, here's what I would do:


Buy an improved "version" from the Provider, if that is even necessary, and I actually can't access the profit distribution
can.
A computer calculates the inputs and outputs, who is the first depositor, high-roller, etc.. According to this, the winnings are "controlled".
Added a few more random hits, as if it really looks like real chance, or rather that even as a winner you can
can win again, and that's how I would run it. Of course only with the good depositors from 50 cent or 1 euro. Whether player because of 10 cent times
50€ would clear me completely schnuppe.

That is for me as an operator a really calculated risk. It helps me as an operator nothing, if at the opening a few High-Roller
come by and clear out the casino with a lucky streak. Ever heard of such a thing? Never heard of it, but it should be
should be possible in the context of gambling

With a computerized payout, I could also prevent such events, and I never go broke. Because despite
House advantage, even a casino has a risk. But going broke because of too much profit(r)n would be new to me.

Providers as well as casinos have a common interest, and that is money. They can never have enough of it.
Look at the German companies that were busted for price fixing. Did they need it? No, but the greed
was too great.

And Gauselmann and Co. are not blank slates anyway...... .

And if licensors like here have to register for inspections or license renewal, well then good night!

That gives me to think.

Often new casinos belong to large groups or limit the payout amounts to so and so much k per week, to escape exactly the case of an early bankruptcy.
Otherwise, clearly in any gambling that is offered commercially, you lose in the long run. Chance (in terms of odds) plays a role when considering a single spin or even a single session. In the long run, you could say that chance only moves within the RTP.
Of course, you can not exclude that it is also cheated
But that would not be necessary...

This post has been translated automatically

evopower140
Expert
I don't think OCs need to call providers

The whole thing can go over the IP just as an example whether it is so no idea

But that's true somehow like in the past with the really good OCs like Mrgreen and Rizk and so the dry spells were not so long the throw already much worse but that also has to do with the PTP even if the specify an RTP of 96 or so but tax are deducted is automatically the RTP lower

This post has been translated automatically

Sarkasto
Expert
so i can understand all the arguments that are mentioned here etc

my counter-argument is simply: the whole system, which until recently was largely uncontrolled in germany and was designed to be very casino/provider-friendly abroad, is profitable enough in my eyes for these reasons alone. And yes, their interest is the money...

but my common sense (or what's left of it) tells me: why commit a billion-dollar fraud, when it is already profitable and safe (especially in the long run) to let everything run within the framework of all regularities?

If they don't get their necks full, then at most what we are already seeing with N1 or Gammix will happen. Simply every week a new casino on the market rotzen. each has a slightly modified concept and they are oriented halt... if it is worthwhile to hire only one chat-dude (yes I look here on Platin) instead of 5 of those with shift operation, then you see it in the profit. To name just one point...

Or am I completely wrong?

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_h%C3%B6chsten_Strafen_wegen_Wettbewerbsverst%C3%B6%C3%9Fen_in_der_EU

Enclosed are companies with agreed prices to earn even more.
As you can see, the list contains almost all the big companies in the world.
Did they take the Risk even though it was not necessary? Yes!
And these are just the ones that got caught....

Did they need to do it? Certainly not. Was the risk justified in comparison to the damage to their image?
Also not. Was it done anyway? Yes. Why?
Because it makes a difference for the higher managing directors, board of directors, bosses, whether I have a 50, or 200m yacht.

Believe, so one begins to think only if one earns in this height, and then the greed becomes ever worse.
What we can not imagine so at all.

Money is very well the only and best reason for all kinds of frauds.
No matter how much the company may already earn without it.

This post has been translated automatically

kyosuma
Experienced

tequiero wrote on 30/01/2022 at 19:55
It has nothing to do with luck or bad luck to help bad luck.

That is exactly the issue. Reading helps.

And by the way: if a company, out of sheer greed, takes Germans into the registration process, fully aware of the possible
The possible legal consequences and repayments, and is sued at some point and loses
sued and loses, then that is pretty stupid. But not for the one who sued.
And again by the way: if from 100% 10% sue, such a casino can still live very well, because people
like you leave their money in the illegal booths. And do not worry, that the casinos have everything planned. Believe
not that they are so stupid.
Clever!

You are an adult whatever, live with the German law, or emigrate!

Have fun with the psychology therapist.

Oh here we p**sed on someone's leg, sorry if you know that, then why the hell are you playing Sherlock anyway?
And for your information I never gamble more than 100 euros what should I complain about? So yeah whatever your problem is, keep it to yourself you are too illogical for me.

Have a nice day.

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
kyosuma wrote on 01/02/2022 at 16:56

Oh here we p**sed on someone's leg, sorry if you know that then why the hell do you even play Sherlock?
And for your information I never gamble more than 100 euros what should I complain about? So yeah whatever your problem is, keep it to yourself you are too illogical for me.

Have a nice day.

Do not know now what this unqualified answer, but ok.

Had you p**sed on my leg, my choice of words would have been somewhat different.
Believe rather, you understand my answer zero!

You have set up a theory that casinos also earn enough money.

I have proven the opposite to you with well-known and the largest companies in the world.

And then comes such an answer? Lol, yes, my answer watr totally illogical, and I assume that
that nobody here understands it except me.

Who says I play and who says I play a lot?

But nice to come in from the side with little idea.

In this sense.....

This post has been translated automatically

xaan2012
Amateur
With everything I read now...

It's not about badmouthing anything or anything else.

Basically, I want to claim my right against the casino to view all data processing of the casino and third parties, the providers.

This prescribes the DSVO so.

I get no response from the casino for days and no one else follows up. The only thing they send are dirty Excel lists with game rounds which are absolutely not what is required.

And I think casinos are absolutely unseriös and massively bad if you have to Deposit as a low budget player always just under 100 euros in increments of 20 to even get a 10s let alone free are which usually fall below 10x stake.

There are enough casinos that are more serious and better.

It is pretended that through taxes per spin the RTP remains, while the MGA before the introduction of taxes was already determined that RTPs are reduced to 87% or so to create a fair environment. Find something just hard antisocial, that companies that already do not get the neck full even more in the ass get pushed and no sau care about the players, if they want to know something exactly.

The MGA is in my eyes an association that is not necessary to exist. They are paid by casinos to write emails to players that always contain rejections.

N1 has lost trust and image completely. At that time you have also times 200 cracked times hits landed times RTPs at 90% higher seen, today can say who wants what, this is neither entertainment nor luck nor anything else.

And everyone who says something else is involved with any Veträgeb or has less than 1% lard in the head.

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
Why do you think so many casinos are with the MGA?
Because they regulate so strictly?
Because they enforce mercilessly?
Because the license is gone in case of violations?
Because they don't let you talk to them?

However, I recently read a report that the MGA would be at a loss even if it wanted to
Who do you think runs the casinos?

https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000080054620/digitale-gluecksspielhochburg-malta-im-griff-der-italienischen-mafia

https://www.online-casino.de/nachrichten/mafia-auf-malta-ist-die-gluecksspiel-aufsicht-unterwandert-29638/

https://www.it-times.de/news/wirecard-verwickelt-in-zweifelhaften-geschaeften-mit-online-casinos-auf-malta-136140/

and so on......

if there is something, Malta and OC are almost always there.

I don't believe that the mafia likes to throw their hard-earned money out to players instead of laundering it.
And since the mafia has its friends up to the highest circles, you can imagine how the
Controls of the MGA look like.

This post has been translated automatically

Dux_Pino_Casino
Rookie
Dear Users,

we would like to emphasize that we always comply with the wishes of our customers. Accordingly, our team also controls any game rounds upon request. We must emphasize that both we and our game providers are licensed by the MGA and there is no individual room for maneuver in terms of RTP

We would also like to emphasize that we comply with European legislation and handle requests according to GDPR by default. Therefore, we ask our users to visit the chat and specify what data they want to see so that we can comply with these requests

We wish you all the best and much success.
The Duxcasino Team

This post has been translated automatically

xaan2012
Amateur
Dux_Pino_Casino wrote on 04.02.2022 at 12:34 pm: Dear users,

we would like to emphasize that we always comply with the wishes of our customers. Accordingly, our team also controls any game rounds upon request. We must emphasize that both we and our game providers are licensed by the MGA and there is no individual room for maneuver in terms of RTP

We would also like to emphasize that we comply with European legislation and handle requests according to GDPR by default. Therefore, we ask our users to visit the chat and specify what data they want to see so that we can comply with these requests

We wish you all the best and much success.
The Duxcasino Team

The data disclosing how player data is stored and processed through Dux and the providers would provide too much about system. I don't think you can get more than ridiculous game rounds listed in a PDF, which does not include any data processing, modification or storage.

and even if there were millions of euros without RTP in the list, you would refer to RTPS, luck or just bad luck......

Duxcasino WAS once mega good, I could upload quite a few data, where to see what you could see at that time a good 2-3 years ago for wins or fair play. There was the RTP still RTP and you had also MAL luck without hundreds of euros for 10x win in 20 cent freespins to press.

All in all, playing at N1 Casinos is nothing like it used to be. And a ridiculous 200 euro win after 500 reinbuttern is nothing but ridiculous.

GOOD casinos should be evaluated not only by support or payout times but also by how often in period x and bet x times free spins come or times a RTP is given.
Their supporters always send only some copy paste answers and once you ask deeper into the matter, you should write ne mail

All in all, these are my PERSONAL experiences at Dux and other N1 Casinos, such as Slotwolf, Betamo and N1 Casino itself. Where you have to say that in other casinos of the N1 Group after a BigWIn also more than 90% zero rounds and free spins are almost NEVER to see.

I emphasize again that I share MY personal experience here and that EVERYTHING I write is true and can be read 1:1 from all the data of the casinos

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics30th Apr. 2024 at 08:53 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately