AS Roma - Inter Milan - X for 3.7
Levante - Eibar - X for 3.3
Augsburg - VfB - X for 3.7
I'm leaning towards the VfB win, as a Stuttgart player that's obvious, but you just have to take the X in this game.
@ Patizi: For 3 x double chance 1/2 in these games kriegste at Tipico ne 2.13.
This post has been translated automatically
u****n
Forum posts:1.196Member has been banned
General sports betting thread 2021
10th Jan. 2021, at 01:51 pm CET#1886
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wutmaennchen wrote on 10.01.2021 at 10:48 am: And already the next tips.
AS Roma - Inter Milan - X for 3.7
Levante - Eibar - X for 3,3
Augsburg - VfB - X for 3.7
I'm leaning towards the VfB win, as a Stuttgart player that's obvious, but you just have to take the X in this game.
@ Patizi: For 3 x double chance 1/2 in these games kriegste at Tipico ne 2.13.
Do you play each game individually X? With X strategy I would personally proceed quite differently and type in the system. As an example, select 5 games and the systems 3 from 5, 4 from 5 and 5 from 5 type
unicorn wrote on 10/01/2021 at 13:51
Do you play each game individually X? For X strategy, I personally would do it quite differently and type in the system. As an example select 5 games and type the systems 3 out of 5, 4 out of 5 and 5 out of 5.
Personally, I would not do this, since X will rarely come up with 3 out of 5 or even more. I believe, there one frustrates too strongly, if almost durably the coupons are lost. With single bets you do not get so much money out at 3 or 4 or 5 right, but you also lose less bets
In the end, I would consider as a bettor, do I want to have smaller successes again and again, or do I want to clear the big Pot once and can accept losing several betting slips...
Sure, a big win would be great, but the bottom line is that I prefer to play for small, steady wins.
X is always a risk.
With single X bets, a hit rate of 33% is enough in the long run.
Wutmaennchen wrote on 10/01/2021 at 14:34: Yes, I usually play the X individually.
Sure, a big win would be great, but the bottom line is that I prefer to play for small steady wins.
X is always a risk.
With single bets X is just enough in the long run ne hit rate of 33%.
The 1st X today already right.
Dat with the 3 odds, is already quite good so. Brauchste one to get your Gekd back. But you also have to be disciplined!
Oh and what the Schalke theme, every week says at least one, somewhere, that Schalke wins! Sometime dat must come yes times! After almost a year! 😂
This post has been translated automatically
u****n
Forum posts:1.196Member has been banned
General sports betting thread 2021
10th Jan. 2021, at 03:50 pm CET#1890
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wutmaennchen wrote on 10/01/2021 at 14:34: Yes, I usually play the X individually.
Sure, a big win would be great, but the bottom line is that I prefer to play for small steady wins.
X is always a risk.
With single bets X is just enough in the long run ne hit rate of 33%.
The 1st X today already right.
to reach 33% in the long run I think is very high. I rather think that one can reach max. between 25% and 30% calculated on a year, thus at the end with 0 or rather a slight minus goes out.
Then I would rather follow the Martingale strategy, with an appropriate starting capital, low selected units and tips on total odds of 2.00, you can probably get out more with a lot of discipline.
unicorn wrote on 10.01.2021 at 15:50
to reach 33% in the long run I think is very high. I rather think that you can achieve a maximum of 25% and 30% over a year, so in the end you go out with 0 or rather a slight minus.
Then I would rather follow the Martingale strategy, with an appropriate starting capital, low selected units and tips on total odds of 2.00, you can probably get out more with a lot of discipline.
But you can't compare that with the Martingale strategy. The 0, i.e. a draw, occurs much more often in sports betting than the 0 in Roulette
This post has been translated automatically
u****n
Forum posts:1.196Member has been banned
General sports betting thread 2021
10th Jan. 2021, at 04:27 pm CET#1892
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Falko wrote on 10/01/2021 at 16:02
But you can't compare it with the Martingale strategy. The 0 so a draw occurs in sports betting much more often than in Roulette the 0 .
ne I do not mean that X should be a zero. It is simply about the strategy that you double your stake in a lost bet and then always bet again on a minimum of 2 total odds. How the 2er quota is composed does not matter, whether as a single bet or as a combination with 2x 1.45 etc.. or over/under bets where only 2 possibilities exist anyway.
Of course everyone knows that Martingale is brutally dangerous and at least in roulette sooner or later can and will lead to a total loss. In sports betting, however, you can lower the Risk very much with your own knowledge and prevent that you do not hit the 2 total quota 8,9,10 times in a row. Because here the gambling factor is significantly lower than in roulette
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes!!!
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Haha, yeah, every now and then I do.
The forum Tip selection was currently unfortunately not good.
Currently I have a hit rate of 30% with an average rate of 3.11. This is of course better
I try that also again tips in the forum are correct
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
AS Roma - Inter Milan - X for 3.7
Levante - Eibar - X for 3.3
Augsburg - VfB - X for 3.7
I'm leaning towards the VfB win, as a Stuttgart player that's obvious, but you just have to take the X in this game.
@ Patizi: For 3 x double chance 1/2 in these games kriegste at Tipico ne 2.13.
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do you play each game individually X? With X strategy I would personally proceed quite differently and type in the system. As an example, select 5 games and the systems 3 from 5, 4 from 5 and 5 from 5 type
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Personally, I would not do this, since X will rarely come up with 3 out of 5 or even more. I believe, there one frustrates too strongly, if almost durably the coupons are lost. With single bets you do not get so much money out at 3 or 4 or 5 right, but you also lose less bets
In the end, I would consider as a bettor, do I want to have smaller successes again and again, or do I want to clear the big Pot once and can accept losing several betting slips...
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sure, a big win would be great, but the bottom line is that I prefer to play for small, steady wins.
X is always a risk.
With single X bets, a hit rate of 33% is enough in the long run.
The 1st X today already right.
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
Dat with the 3 odds, is already quite good so. Brauchste one to get your Gekd back. But you also have to be disciplined!
Oh and what the Schalke theme, every week says at least one, somewhere, that Schalke wins! Sometime dat must come yes times! After almost a year! 😂
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
to reach 33% in the long run I think is very high. I rather think that one can reach max. between 25% and 30% calculated on a year, thus at the end with 0 or rather a slight minus goes out.
Then I would rather follow the Martingale strategy, with an appropriate starting capital, low selected units and tips on total odds of 2.00, you can probably get out more with a lot of discipline.
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
But you can't compare that with the Martingale strategy. The 0, i.e. a draw, occurs much more often in sports betting than the 0 in Roulette
This post has been translated automatically
General sports betting thread 2021
Nobody has liked this post so far
ne I do not mean that X should be a zero. It is simply about the strategy that you double your stake in a lost bet and then always bet again on a minimum of 2 total odds. How the 2er quota is composed does not matter, whether as a single bet or as a combination with 2x 1.45 etc.. or over/under bets where only 2 possibilities exist anyway.
Of course everyone knows that Martingale is brutally dangerous and at least in roulette sooner or later can and will lead to a total loss. In sports betting, however, you can lower the Risk very much with your own knowledge and prevent that you do not hit the 2 total quota 8,9,10 times in a row. Because here the gambling factor is significantly lower than in roulette
This post has been translated automatically