Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Slot Games in general: Games are getting worse and worse. (Page 2)

Topic created on 24th Apr. 2018 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 17 | Views: 3,980
Pagani
Rookie
I just thought that's how I feel about the new games. Asgardian Stones etc. I find it extremely sobering. Even with free turns. What are you supposed to do with 5 turns.

Playtech I had seen at 365bet. At 375vegas you then have the newer games. My first big win I had at that time in a playtech game. Since I was still a freshman and quite awestruck and way too flashed about it and have waited patiently 4 days.

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
yes there are to heap there !
Find the just very varied compared to all the Netent and Play'n Go dirt that currently comes on the market ...

Yes that's right 5 free spins !!! For what ??? who brings such ideas in such games ?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Sweep88 wrote on 04/24/2018 at 4:13 PM

Yes right 5 free spins !!! For what ??? who brings such ideas in such games ?


If he stops at all on the free spins, otherwise gibts about 2x the bet.

This post has been translated automatically

Matthias
Expert
So I think that many game manufacturers currently decide to produce "low-variance slots", where on the one hand no huge wins attract, but on the other hand the money is not eaten away so quickly. This is probably to give you the chance to play the game longer, even if you don't have much capital available.

To give an example: Merkur's slots were, in my opinion, very much programmed on the "all or nothing" principle.
This means that in a casino where there are maybe 16 or 24 machines, there will be one machine that really throws and makes noise and all the other gamblers look stupid and lose their money. The possible win with Merkur or Novomatic slots was high, but just rare - and this one rare moment is enough to attract the entire arcade, so that all are hooked and expect the same picture.
However, this calculation did not work out, at least for Merkur online. If the online slot behaves the same way as the Slot machine in the arcade, then there's no one next to you who's raking in a big win and you yourself sit and gamble, and gamble and the money is eaten away.
This "all or nothing" principle of Merkur has not proven itself online.

Therefore, the manufacturers are probably trying to bring out a lot of slots that keep throwing smaller wins, then calling them BIG WIN, even if the Win factor is only 10x.
You have a bit of a feeling of "oh BIG WIN - Super" and in the end it's all gone. - After all, the playing time was then long, but in the long run you win just nothing.

In my opinion, there are still many slots with high Variance and correspondingly high possible win factor.
Thunderkick has some on offer that I personally like very much - e.g. Pink Elephants, Flame Busters or also The Falcon Huntress

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
Matthias wrote on 04/24/2018 at 16:19
That's probably why manufacturers try to bring out a lot of slots that keep throwing smaller wins, then call them BIG WIN, even if the Win factor is only 10x.
You get a bit of a feeling of "oh BIG WIN - Super" and it's all gone in the end. - After all, the playing time was then long, but in the long run you win just nothing.

can someone tell the manufacturers that a mixture between low and high Risk would be announced what is the use of hours of gameplay if I am then +-zero --> rather minus. the other way around, my balance would not be eaten in 10 min just because I have --> prospect of a mega win. of course you lose more often
what is missing at the moment are the real bigger and biggest wins that used to save you every now and then

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Matthias wrote on 04/24/2018 at 16:19
To give an example: Merkur's slots were, in my opinion, very much programmed on the principle of "all or nothing".
That means, in a gambling house where there are maybe 16 or 24 machines, there will be one machine that really throws and makes noise and all the other gamblers look stupid out of the laundry and lose their money. The possible win with Merkur or Novomatic slots was high, but just rare - and this one rare moment is enough to attract the entire arcade, so that all are hooked and expect the same picture.
However, this calculation did not work out, at least for Merkur online. If the online slot behaves the same way as the Slot machine in the arcade, then there's no one next to you who's raking in a big win and you yourself sit and gamble, and gamble and the money is eaten away.
This "all or nothing" principle of Merkur has not proven itself online.


the mathematics of adp games offline and online are almost identical. it's simply the mass of players online that push the odds.
take all the offline boxes together and it's no longer just the one machine that throws.

most new games are just graphical variations. the mathematics behind it is often the same or if changed at all only at smaller adjusting screws.
this practice was and is also applied to offline games. at least to the games that have a fairly high acceptance among players.

to conjure a completely new mathematics out of the hat every time is not something you can do in 5 minutes

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
In principle, I also find good games.
The last two new but I have tried...total disappointment.
Archangels from Netent: meanwhile 120 € on min.stake 0,4 € put in without free spins best win x20 about. The general potential:100 winning ways X 1,50 € ( on 40cent)=150 euro.
So x375 for a full screen of the highest symbol....
cool.
Extra chilli I also tried, bought FS 4 times, got 1x +4.Not gambled.
Highest win x7....with the game I'm throughðŸ˜' I could have guessed though, Bonanza has also never given me a win more than x75 with 12 spins and that only rarely. Buying FS for x50 with only 8 spins is of course not promising either...

This post has been translated automatically

blizzard1986
Experienced
You are definitely right. Especially with Netent it is of course totally noticeable. The new Archangels slot for example to name just one.
Personally, I hope that Netent saves with the JUMANJI slot hyped by all sides to rauszuhauen again a really good. I am ultra looking forward to this slot.
I am also looking forward to the release of Relic Hunters from Netent. The slot also seems to have potential.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 04:20 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately