It's called coincidence. Accounting system is called mumbo jumbo. If your nerves or your cognitive capacities are not suitable for gambling, better leave it. You see, you get excited about things that are totally unnecessary.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Eye of dirt
2nd Sep. 2019, at 04:40 pm CEST#3
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Argon, maybe you should consider taking a bigger break. Get out in the fresh air, do something that will stretch you a little so you can get your mind off things.
Anchor Thrower wrote on 09/03/2019 at 13:30: What is faking? What is he faking. I've read this several times on the forum now.
Faking probably means that two Scatters come but the third does not. On the one hand, I don't think much of personifying a programmed game and making statements like "he's faking", "he fooled me", "he gave" etc
I think from a purely logical point of view it is more likely that two scatters will come up than three and thus you should see this image more often. On the other hand, I am very aware of how such a machine works. Two scatters and no win is simply a 0X win in the system, you don't necessarily need two scatters to appear for that. The fact is that an "almost win" such as 2 scatters has the same effect on the brain as a win, the same areas are triggered. This is what programmers of slots play with, of course, as it is a way to keep the player interested and still cause a total loss. So I think that repeatedly 2 Scatter show is programmed into the system. However, I do not believe that this is account-bound
Okay, so this is a result of subjective perception after all. I almost thought so. Thank you for your detailed explanation.
I come from the IT and program very much. I built a simulator for Roulette and simulated different strategies x-million times. So I probably know how to take and sort each result and never thought that you can personalize a game. At least roulette has never surprised me.
I wonder if someone like the topic starter would also assign such properties to a Random Number Generator programmed by me.
However, Roulette and slots are two pairs of shoes. The mathematics behind roulette is simple and above all obvious to everyone. With slots you don't know that exactly. You have the indication of the RTP but that is also only a statistical average value. The more obscure a thing is, the more mistrust is also stirred up. Whereby here in the forum also some distrust the roulette. Even the simple random generator that draws the lottery winners is distrusted
Eye of dirt
Liked this post: Anonym
Very bad programmed rip-off game
Always after FS it starts to lure or fool with two times Scatter
If you change bet either he goes in quickly or starts to fool again
The game play is very similar to Merkur Spielothek
This is also true for el torerro online
Eye of H
many times FS
20cent FS pays 1€
30cent pays 80cent
40cent 1.50
50cent 3
At the end he throws me the 100€ that I gambled away in Eye of horus
Immediately logged out
Had I continued to play would have eaten double
As if that is a coincidence
Everything is subject to an accounting system
Everything only calculations
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Liked this post:
Jenn-R, 
trekki
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Liked this post:
LaHaine95, 
trekki
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
Everyone who has been playing longer and more often knows that
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
Faking probably means that two Scatters come but the third does not. On the one hand, I don't think much of personifying a programmed game and making statements like "he's faking", "he fooled me", "he gave" etc
I think from a purely logical point of view it is more likely that two scatters will come up than three and thus you should see this image more often. On the other hand, I am very aware of how such a machine works. Two scatters and no win is simply a 0X win in the system, you don't necessarily need two scatters to appear for that. The fact is that an "almost win" such as 2 scatters has the same effect on the brain as a win, the same areas are triggered. This is what programmers of slots play with, of course, as it is a way to keep the player interested and still cause a total loss. So I think that repeatedly 2 Scatter show is programmed into the system. However, I do not believe that this is account-bound
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Nobody has liked this post so far
I come from the IT and program very much. I built a simulator for Roulette and simulated different strategies x-million times. So I probably know how to take and sort each result and never thought that you can personalize a game. At least roulette has never surprised me.
I wonder if someone like the topic starter would also assign such properties to a Random Number Generator programmed by me.
This post has been translated automatically
Eye of dirt
Liked this post:
Horsepower44
This post has been translated automatically