Gamer777 wrote on 09/20/2019 11:48 AM
Yes but some meant yes probably here equal nen ID with to upload...... ... .
Well, nevertheless, the sense is so a forum here the absolute anonymity and that is then no longer necessarily given.
Just my opinion - everyone can do as he wants...... ... .
well, hundreds of people see your face every day, as long as you go out sometimes. the rest is your username (which everyone here sees) the current date (everyone should know) and that this forum is called gamblejoe (everyone here should also know)
i don't see why anonymity is endangered here? Especially in every dirty casino people upload perso, invoices, credit card, online banking screenshot, bank statements etc.
Totoro wrote on 20.09.2019 at 11:56 am: Exactly, the GJ team just wants a picture of your pretty face and a white piece of paper with a few letters on it. There beckons as a reward a "verified" and your salvation incl. later "Fastlane treatment" at the pearly gates.
The salvation of the soul - thus the soul freed from sins and redeemed - to promise now by the Verification (of the physical shell) in a gambling forum of all things: all sorts! ^^
So as long as there is no added value I will not do it unfortunately.
The purpose pursued (I think like the majority here) is not achieved. On the one hand because unverified members can participate in the lottery, on the other hand because a picture with Gamblejoe name brings you felt nothing.
Why not verify yourself as in Online Casinos with Perso + utility bill?
So I have now also confirmed my "authenticity as a unique piece"!
(priceless&simply incorrigible😉✌😂)
SO I THINK THE Verification IS GOOD AND HONESTLY, I THINK IT SHOULD ALSO ONLY VERIFIED MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN THE SWEEPSTAKES!
FROM GAMBLEJOE ALSO EXPECTS EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATES, THAT THE DRAWS ARE CORRECT AND FAIR FROM HAPPENING - ERGO ->VERIFIED = FAIRNESS TOWARDS ALL MEMBERS
1. IS THE ETERNAL SORROW TOPIC "DOUBLE ACCOUNT" DONE
2. ONE IS SOMETHING MORE, ON THE SAFE SIDE WHAT THE FULL YEAR LIFE MEANS (milk faces excluded, laugh)
3. HAVE AS GOOD AS ANY CASINO PLAYER PUT OUT HIS FULL AND SIGNIFICANTLY DETAILED DATA (which could be more likely to be used for shenanigans) TO ALL POSSIBLE WEB SITES.
... .besides, no one sees how "schrorr" one is because the because => is deleted afterwards the proof picture... 😂😉
I will probably verify myself at some point, but I don't think it will be of much use. How a completely voluntary Verification of this kind should prevent double accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?
Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?
The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable
Bone wrote on 09/20/2019 at 15:48: While I will probably still verify at some point, I don't think it will be of much use either. How a completely voluntary Verification of this kind is supposed to prevent duplicate accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?
Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?
The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable.
Bone wrote on 09/20/2019 at 15:48: While I will probably still verify at some point, I don't think it will be of much use either. How a completely voluntary Verification of this sort is supposed to prevent duplicate accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?
Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?
The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable.
therefore yes, participation in raffles only for verified members
Dagmarlena wrote on 20/09/2019 at 16:01
therefore yes, participation in sweepstakes only for verified members
But this regulation does not take place so yes. And after the strained protestations that the Verification is absolutely voluntary, I also do not believe that this will come into force in the future
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
well, hundreds of people see your face every day, as long as you go out sometimes. the rest is your username (which everyone here sees) the current date (everyone should know) and that this forum is called gamblejoe (everyone here should also know)
i don't see why anonymity is endangered here? Especially in every dirty casino people upload perso, invoices, credit card, online banking screenshot, bank statements etc.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Liked this post: S****8,
Useless4yu
The salvation of the soul - thus the soul freed from sins and redeemed - to promise now by the Verification (of the physical shell) in a gambling forum of all things: all sorts! ^^
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
The purpose pursued (I think like the majority here) is not achieved. On the one hand because unverified members can participate in the lottery, on the other hand because a picture with Gamblejoe name brings you felt nothing.
Why not verify yourself as in Online Casinos with Perso + utility bill?
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Liked this post:
Christoph, 
Dagmarlena
Behold my brothers and sisters. Miracle! Matthias has been released from his torment. Get verified today and join the circle of the liberated!
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
(priceless&simply incorrigible😉✌😂)
SO I THINK THE Verification IS GOOD AND HONESTLY, I THINK IT SHOULD ALSO ONLY VERIFIED MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN THE SWEEPSTAKES!
FROM GAMBLEJOE ALSO EXPECTS EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATES, THAT THE DRAWS ARE CORRECT AND FAIR FROM HAPPENING - ERGO ->VERIFIED = FAIRNESS TOWARDS ALL MEMBERS
1. IS THE ETERNAL SORROW TOPIC "DOUBLE ACCOUNT" DONE
2. ONE IS SOMETHING MORE, ON THE SAFE SIDE WHAT THE FULL YEAR LIFE MEANS (milk faces excluded, laugh)
3. HAVE AS GOOD AS ANY CASINO PLAYER PUT OUT HIS FULL AND SIGNIFICANTLY DETAILED DATA (which could be more likely to be used for shenanigans) TO ALL POSSIBLE WEB SITES.
... .besides, no one sees how "schrorr" one is because the because => is deleted afterwards the proof picture... 😂😉
... just my opinion.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Liked this post:
Falko, 
sonne10
Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?
The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
+1
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
therefore yes, participation in raffles only for verified members
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
But this regulation does not take place so yes. And after the strained protestations that the Verification is absolutely voluntary, I also do not believe that this will come into force in the future
This post has been translated automatically