Please don't take this as criticism and I hope it won't be followed by a shitstorm, but honestly:
I think that lately here at Gamblejoe, the posts about multiaccounting, PSC-Hunting and Forumspam, are discussed too much.
... wanted to verify myself via setting and had to smile - a) because I still haven't figured out how to fold the napkin and b)... Because I think that GambleJoe doesn't need that.
Again blond asked in the round: even if one verifies itself now here, one could have trzdm besides still 5 accounts around mtl the chances on PSCs to increase, or?!?!
I thought until now that GJ somehow has a standard technique/software/procedure, which internally points out possible double accounts...
How do other sites do that?
Insa24 wrote on 09/24/2019 at 19:57: Please don't take this as criticism and I hope it won't be followed by a shitstorm, but honestly:
I find that lately here at Gamblejoe, the posts around multiaccounting, PSC-hunting and forumspam, are way too much thematized.
... wanted to verify myself via setting and had to smile - a) because I still haven't figured out how to fold the napkin and b)... Because I think that GambleJoe doesn't need that.
Again blond asked in the round: even if one verifies itself now here, one could have trzdm besides still 5 accounts around mtl the chances on PSCs to increase, or?!?!
I thought until now that GJ has a standard technique/software/procedure, which internally points out possible double accounts...
How do other sites do that?
Fold it you can as often as you want, it's about let's say the A4 sheet is so small so that the written what you hold in the webcam is well readable, it must also still your face on it.
Dear ones
there you see once again that it also works with sense and reason. I find the idea terrific and have also immediately times the image uploaded. I hope times that the one who must edit it does not get a fright 🥳🤗😂
Unfortunately, now times multiaccounts increase dramatically, especially when there is something for free or to win. Unfortunately, the players who are honest and only have 1 chance each, often have to suffer.
I do not want to address anyone who can not be verified, I think to myself only "hit dogs bark"
MissesMiss wrote on 07/10/2019 at 21:40: Dear ones
there you see once again that it also works with sense and reason. I find the idea terrific and have also immediately uploaded the image. I hope that the one who has to edit it does not get a fright 🥳🤗😂
Unfortunately, now times multiaccounts increase dramatically, especially when there is something for free or to win. Unfortunately, the players who are honest and only have 1 chance each, often have to suffer.
I do not want to address anyone who can not be verified, I think to myself only "hit dogs bark"
Thanks for this great idea 🥰
As mentioned several times in this thread, multiple accounts can't be prevented this way, at most it can be made a bit more difficult. And that only if it would be mandatory
Stromberg wrote on 07 Oct 2019 21:44
As already mentioned several times in this thread, multiple accounts can't be prevented this way, at most made a bit more difficult. And that only if for sure
Sure you can neither prevent it with this, but you should also always think a thought further.
Let's look at it from another point of view, everything has a basic idea, which is usually implemented bumpily in the beginning. At some point, you develop your idea further, revise it.
Let's just wait and see what becomes of this idea. 🤷🏻♀️
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
9th Dec. 2019, at 03:04 pm CET#107
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't think it's a bad idea
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
9th Dec. 2019, at 03:24 pm CET#108
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
edit:
Who has fear, that with his pictures unfug is driven, has hopefully no facebook
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think that lately here at Gamblejoe, the posts about multiaccounting, PSC-Hunting and Forumspam, are discussed too much.
... wanted to verify myself via setting and had to smile - a) because I still haven't figured out how to fold the napkin and b)... Because I think that GambleJoe doesn't need that.
Again blond asked in the round: even if one verifies itself now here, one could have trzdm besides still 5 accounts around mtl the chances on PSCs to increase, or?!?!
I thought until now that GJ somehow has a standard technique/software/procedure, which internally points out possible double accounts...
How do other sites do that?
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Fold it you can as often as you want, it's about let's say the A4 sheet is so small so that the written what you hold in the webcam is well readable, it must also still your face on it.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
there you see once again that it also works with sense and reason. I find the idea terrific and have also immediately times the image uploaded. I hope times that the one who must edit it does not get a fright 🥳🤗😂
Unfortunately, now times multiaccounts increase dramatically, especially when there is something for free or to win. Unfortunately, the players who are honest and only have 1 chance each, often have to suffer.
I do not want to address anyone who can not be verified, I think to myself only "hit dogs bark"
Thanks for this great idea 🥰
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Liked this post:
Insa24
As mentioned several times in this thread, multiple accounts can't be prevented this way, at most it can be made a bit more difficult. And that only if it would be mandatory
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sure you can neither prevent it with this, but you should also always think a thought further.
Let's look at it from another point of view, everything has a basic idea, which is usually implemented bumpily in the beginning. At some point, you develop your idea further, revise it.
Let's just wait and see what becomes of this idea. 🤷🏻♀️
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Who has fear, that with his pictures unfug is driven, has hopefully no facebook
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary)
Liked this post: Anonym
Don't you have hands ?
This post has been translated automatically