GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
27th Oct. 2020, at 05:13 pm CET#53
1 Like
Liked this post: u****n
unicorn wrote on 10/27/2020 at 2:38 pm
then f**k with the users in your other SocialenNetworks but don't bother us here anymore
And gamblejoe will continue to do nothing about this garbage,as always. I hope new users find other forums that are at least interested in truthful posts.
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
27th Oct. 2020, at 10:13 pm CET#56
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
ChillEffect wrote on 10/27/2020 at 9:57 pm: Of course gamblejoe doesn't do that...
In any case not conscientiously.
Casino reputation is neglected too much here in my opinion.
It would actually need an extra employee who processes the Toplist/Greylist/Blacklist daily and updates it based on user reports. So no casino can rest on laurels received in the past. It is clear to me that this is a lot of work and it also requires a certain tact on the part of the editor, but the resulting benefit for GJ would be quite high. In addition, the lists and reputations should also be shown in English.
Begbie wrote on 10/27/2020 at 10:13 pm
Definitely not conscientious.
Casino reputation is neglected too much here in my opinion.
It would need actually an extra employee the Toplist/Greylist/Blacklist daily processed and updated on the basis of user reports. So no casino can rest on laurels received in the past. It is clear to me that this is a lot of work and it also requires a certain tact on the part of the editor, but the resulting benefit for GJ would be quite high. In addition, the lists and reputations should also be shown in English.
Fortune Legends Casino was also put on the greylist because of complaints about it here in the forum. I just looked, this casino can still be found there. And it was said at the time, if it improves, this casino comes out of there again. One has long read here no more complaint about it. Thus one could remove this casino from there down also again and instead one would have to assign for the time being Lapalingo this place. At 29 euros salary certificates demand, so nothing is more correct and there would already do some pressure well from the casino forums with a worse ranking.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
27th Oct. 2020, at 11:16 pm CET#58
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Falko wrote on 27.10.2020 at 22:41
Fortune Legends Casino came at that time also on the Greylist, because here in the forum the complaints have piled up about it. I just had a look, this casino is still there. And it was said at the time, if it improves, this casino comes out of there again. One has long read here no more complaint about it. Thus one could remove this casino from there down also again and instead one would have to assign for the time being Lapalingo this place. At 29 euros salary certificates demand, so nothing is more correct and there would already do some pressure well from the casino forums with a worse ranking.
Yes absolutely correct. I see exactly the same. Hopefully gamblejoe undertakes in this regard in the near future what...
I would never Deposit in such a crappy casino like Lapalingo if I read even 1 complaint here
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
28th Oct. 2020, at 12:16 am CET#59
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Guys 80% of the providers in the new "Gambling stores" section are rated with 4 out of 5 possible points. You all have no idea or you are just doing something wrong.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
28th Oct. 2020, at 01:11 am CET#60
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
ChillEffect wrote on 10/27/2020 at 11:16 pm
Yes absolutely correct. I see it exactly the same way. Hopefully gamblejoe does something about this in the near future...
I would never Deposit in such a shitty casino like Lapalingo if I read even 1 complaint here
I think you should leave the church in the village. Of course it is excessive to ask someone for proof of salary when you request a payout in the low 2-digit range
Begbie has it right. If you put a GJ employee here to put casinos on the Grey/Blacklist, that person needs a very good touch. Just because someone shouts that the casino must be on the list, it does not mean that the casino is leaning against the law
Matthias has pointed out in a thread that there are some casinos that want to be "broken regulated". Lapalingo is unfortunately such a casino, which wants to comply with the legal requirements and thus makes itself unpopular with its players
Jokerboy wrote on 28.10.2020 at 01:11 Clock
I think one should leave the church in the village. Sure it's excessive to ask someone for proof of salary when you're asking for a payout in the low 2 figures
Begbie has it right. If you put a GJ employee here to put casinos on the Grey/Blacklist, that person needs a very good touch. Just because someone shouts that the casino must be on the list, it does not mean that the casino is leaning against the law
Matthias has pointed out in a thread that there are some casinos that want to be "broken regulated". Lapalingo is unfortunately such a casino, which wants to comply with the legal requirements and thus makes itself unpopular with its players.
I am sure that Matthias not Lapalingo meant when he spoke of casinos that can be "kaputt regulate". But he meant the casinos that are already implementing things that are only necessary from mid-December.
Lapalingo is doing something that is not in the new laws. At least I have not read that in any bill in recent weeks somewhere that casinos are required to demand proof of salary and other things such as selfie with sheet of paper, especially not with no Deposit offers / payments.
The casino has already attracted attention in the past by strange things and has now simply added a notch and will now argue with the new "legal situation". Which is absolutely ridiculous......
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
28th Oct. 2020, at 01:41 pm CET#62
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Falko wrote on 27.10.2020 at 22:41: Fortune Legends Casino came at that time also on the Greylist, because here in the forum the complaints have piled up about it.
not because of that, they voluntarily put themselves on it because they still had to do with their little problems. then I no longer paid attention to it.
it is here
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/erfahrungen-mit-fortune-legends-das-neue-online-casino-auf-gamblejoe-106462/4/#p106851
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Liked this post: u****n
And gamblejoe will continue to do nothing about this garbage,as always. I hope new users find other forums that are at least interested in truthful posts.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
Whether delay payout or otherwise what. Everything should be clear here understandable
Of most casinos here where are in the top list, there were already some users here yet problems with the casinos and such is misleading
Of course, gamblejoe does not do that..
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Liked this post: Anonym
In any case not conscientiously.
Casino reputation is neglected too much here in my opinion.
It would actually need an extra employee who processes the Toplist/Greylist/Blacklist daily and updates it based on user reports. So no casino can rest on laurels received in the past. It is clear to me that this is a lot of work and it also requires a certain tact on the part of the editor, but the resulting benefit for GJ would be quite high. In addition, the lists and reputations should also be shown in English.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Liked this post: Anonym,
Christian1337, 
palme7777, 
sippi
Fortune Legends Casino was also put on the greylist because of complaints about it here in the forum. I just looked, this casino can still be found there. And it was said at the time, if it improves, this casino comes out of there again. One has long read here no more complaint about it. Thus one could remove this casino from there down also again and instead one would have to assign for the time being Lapalingo this place. At 29 euros salary certificates demand, so nothing is more correct and there would already do some pressure well from the casino forums with a worse ranking.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes absolutely correct. I see exactly the same. Hopefully gamblejoe undertakes in this regard in the near future what...
I would never Deposit in such a crappy casino like Lapalingo if I read even 1 complaint here
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think you should leave the church in the village. Of course it is excessive to ask someone for proof of salary when you request a payout in the low 2-digit range
Begbie has it right. If you put a GJ employee here to put casinos on the Grey/Blacklist, that person needs a very good touch. Just because someone shouts that the casino must be on the list, it does not mean that the casino is leaning against the law
Matthias has pointed out in a thread that there are some casinos that want to be "broken regulated". Lapalingo is unfortunately such a casino, which wants to comply with the legal requirements and thus makes itself unpopular with its players
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Liked this post:
Jubla2014, 
sippi
I am sure that Matthias not Lapalingo meant when he spoke of casinos that can be "kaputt regulate". But he meant the casinos that are already implementing things that are only necessary from mid-December.
Lapalingo is doing something that is not in the new laws. At least I have not read that in any bill in recent weeks somewhere that casinos are required to demand proof of salary and other things such as selfie with sheet of paper, especially not with no Deposit offers / payments.
The casino has already attracted attention in the past by strange things and has now simply added a notch and will now argue with the new "legal situation". Which is absolutely ridiculous......
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: Gambling houses and online casinos - New overview
Nobody has liked this post so far
not because of that, they voluntarily put themselves on it because they still had to do with their little problems. then I no longer paid attention to it.
it is here
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/erfahrungen-mit-fortune-legends-das-neue-online-casino-auf-gamblejoe-106462/4/#p106851
This post has been translated automatically