-
Playmaus, today at 11:36 am CET
-
BinGOLDiG, yesterday at 10:58 pm CET
-
garfield68, yesterday at 11:48 am CET
-
upola, today at 01:23 pm CET
-
slotliebe89, today at 01:13 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, today at 12:42 pm CET
-
garfield68, today at 10:44 am CET
-
Endstation, yesterday at 11:43 pm CET
-
WithoutWings, yesterday at 10:39 pm CET
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 10:00 pm CET
-
Ada090689, yesterday at 08:53 pm CET
-
R3hab, yesterday at 12:53 pm CET
-
roccoammo11, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 10:20 pm CET
-
Malganes, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 08:53 pm CET
-
Sascha_Khan23, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 08:39 pm CET
-
GernotB, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 08:10 pm CET
-
btssultan, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 07:29 pm CET
-
Langhans_innen, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 06:40 pm CET
-
Langhans_innen, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 03:41 pm CET
-
evopower140, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 03:04 pm CET
-
moody, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 02:28 pm CET
-
DieWunderharke5000, on 7th Feb. 2025 at 11:22 am CET
-
Hightower, on 6th Feb. 2025 at 07:33 pm CET
-
Comingsoon19, on 6th Feb. 2025 at 04:40 pm CET
-
Julian, on 6th Feb. 2025 at 01:48 pm CET
-
mtorero, on 6th Feb. 2025 at 01:04 pm CET
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Liked this post: Anonym
this is a question for the gamblejoe team.
i am also a lot on the international sites that
are very similar to gamblejoe...casino reviews, forum,
bonus offers etc. you know what I mean and you are
probably also clear from which sides the speech is. if not
i will name some under my post.
on the subject I noticed that on your casino Blacklist
are just 6 casinos and 2 of them because they have their affiliate
invoices that may be of interest to you
but the player brings very little.
in truth, there are a hundred or more casinos that are much worse
as the 6 on your list. which are known for being
not paying players in general or the like.
i think it is naive and grossly negligent not to pay these casinos here
list only because they are not listed with you or "only" a
curacao or hold no license at all.
furthermore, you lull players into supposed security when
they only play in casinos with a license from an eu country.
malta, gibralta, etc. which is de facto wrong. the gambling
on the internet is still illegal for german players despite
eu law. prosecution is in the per mille range, but the
but a judicial proceeding in case of non-payment
of wins is nevertheless excluded no matter whether the casino
holds a license from malta, curacao, timbuktu or anywhere else.
the legal situation is understandably clarified here:
https://www.anwalt.de/rechtstipps/online-casinos-alles-illegal-oder-was_156813.html
quite detailed lists with blacklisted casinos can be found here:
---- Links to competitors removed - please note the advertising guidelines in the forum rules!
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
you can just Deposit and play as you want you will get your money even if the amount is very high
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Liked this post: v****2
i also stumbled across the only six casinos today.
by the way, your repeated game-tech group warning has saved me some time and (probably) damage here. merci.
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Liked this post: Anonym
no need to thank...if i have kept
from depositing his money at these
these junk shops i am already satisfied
satisfied
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Liked this post: Anonym
What I criticize is similar to you. That casinos that cause problems for players are not taken more seriously. Ikibu was known for its snail's pace and not since yesterday. This is preceded by years! But only now they come into the blacklist.
A selection of casinos that Gamblejoe can really recommend would be something to improve the quality while adding more casinos because they want to increase Affiliate revenue and expand the overview.
Casino that use the RTP reduced versions should actually be marked. This is in my eyes fraud because the average player does not consistently look at the game info. Videoslots now has a great 93% at Red Tiger pure, I'm really excited that now a local casino (casino) what RTP is nothing inferior and in some cases even surpasses.
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
This is important for the players because this is a warning signal that the casino is in trouble financially. For example, at Quasar there were many reports that players complained about hardly winning anything a few weeks before they closed the store. Otherwise I am completely with you...
@Kleinkariert:
I would welcome here even a Greylist in the all casinos are listed the reduced RTP versions use.Dazu a downranking by 20 places in the casino comparison.
What good is a reliable and fast payout if you have nothing to pay out
______________________________________________________________________________
Generally, the MGA likes to find fault with casinos with Curacao (or other) license, after all, is a competitor. But it is also not to be dismissed from the hand that the worst scam casinos often work with Curacao licenses.
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
oh man the belief in such blacklists is really exaggerated. sure they can help, but must also be maintained and who can say with 100% certainty that all games are fake slots? Even Futuriti changes every now and then, so that they are no longer all fake. but who is always supposed to check that and say with 100% certainty. what if such companies then take action against the operator of the comparison portal because of reputational damage?
awesome what people expect from a free portal, what's wrong with the world?
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
@smallcart
the point of such a list is not whether gamblejoe has something against casinos with curacao
license or not but to warn players from certain casinos/casino group's.
it is completely naive to think that no one would play there anymore...
just leaving them all out and pretending they don't even exist doesn't speak
for gamblejoe...then you might as well leave out the section.
This post has been translated automatically
why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence
Nobody has liked this post so far
@thelastgambler
from free can be here also no speech...!
you do not pay with hard currency but for example with your
registration and your activity here in the forum...that generates traffic and the more traffic
more traffic the more interesting the site becomes for paying casino partners.
or with a registration at one of the casinos listed here (of course only
if you also use the link here on the site)
so from because of free...! so runs the same is also completely ok.
This post has been translated automatically