Feedback: Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here (Page 121)

This post has been translated automatically

Julian wrote on 22.01.2024 at 15:36: Hello dear community,

first of all, thank you very much for the suggestions for improvement!

We have just discussed all the suggestions internally, be it the "private thread" on Gambling addiction or hiding the winning pictures / winning video function for individual members who don't want to be triggered by it.

Unfortunately, we came to the conclusion for both topics that it would be too complex for us in terms of programming, as the work involved could easily take 1-2 weeks and we are also not really convinced whether these changes represent real added value for the platform.
To be honest, we are even of the opinion that if a member finds that they feel triggered by the content, the wiser step would be to distance themselves completely from our platform.
For example, you can delete or pause your account in the settings.

After all, in the worst case scenario, a member could feel triggered by forum posts alone, the only question would then be where to start and where to stop hiding content for individual members.
At the same time, the member who is not logged in would still have access to all content, as we cannot start hiding all areas completely for all guests.

The situation is relatively similar with the private threads on gambling addiction.
As already mentioned by some members, a private chat or perhaps even a group chat would make much more sense in this case.
Our Communicator, for example, would be suitable for this at the moment, and the idea of a group chat is also already on our to-do list, but is still somewhat up in the air as we are currently busy with other things.
But it's not unlikely that we'll put such a feature online at some point in the future

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Julian wrote on 22.01.2024 at 15:36: Hello dear community,

first of all, thank you very much for the suggestions for improvement!

We have just discussed all the suggestions internally, be it the "private thread" on Gambling addiction or hiding the winning pictures / winning video function for individual members who don't want to be triggered by it.

Unfortunately, we came to the conclusion for both topics that it would be too complex for us in terms of programming, as the work involved could easily take 1-2 weeks and we are also not really convinced whether these changes represent real added value for the platform.
To be honest, we are even of the opinion that if a member finds that they feel triggered by the content, the wiser step would be to distance themselves completely from our platform.
For example, you can delete or pause your account in the settings.

After all, in the worst case scenario, a member could feel triggered by forum posts alone, the only question would then be where to start and where to stop hiding content for individual members.
At the same time, the member who is not logged in would still have access to all content, as we cannot start hiding all areas completely for all guests.

The situation is relatively similar with the private threads on gambling addiction.
As already mentioned by some members, a private chat or perhaps even a group chat would make much more sense in this case.
Our Communicator, for example, would be suitable for this at the moment, and the idea of a group chat is also already on our to-do list, but is still somewhat up in the air as we are currently busy with other things.
But it's not unlikely that we'll put such a feature online at some point in the future

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11 wrote on 22.01.2024 at 16:39: Everyone can let their thoughts run free as long as you remain factual & don't insult anyone..I can't understand many views either, but for others it might be interesting again..that's the good thing about the forum here. I would find it much worse if the topic of Gambling addiction was completely avoided here...

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on January 22nd, 2024 at 7:40 pm:
Who said the opposite? Nobody wrote anything against our suggestions or discussions. I think you misunderstood someone ^^

But yes, you are welcome to make your opinion known. You can then explain to the others why you think the proposal is good or bad. We all think differently. I studied business administration (unfortunately not finished) and therefore have the "glasses" of a business economist. It could have been that a social worker would have joined the discussion and added his two cents. Of course, I wouldn't have had anything against that, but this person would have explained their perspective to us in more detail and possibly backed it up with arguments.

One of my professors once said that every academic has their own glasses and can therefore only see their own point of view. Example: you are a business economist and discuss with an engineer about a possible investment that is necessary for a new project. The economist only sees the investment to be made and is strictly against it, while the engineer thinks the innovation is important and is therefore in favor of it.

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11 wrote on 23.01.2024 09:54:

Yes, your prof is certainly absolutely right about that..so all the better if all points of view are represented here! when will new casinos or sports betting providers be added to the list again? tipico was out faster than they were in....

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically