Feedback: Problem solved
Best Online Casinos
Hot Topics18th May. 2024 at 01:58 pm CEST
-
Patizi, on 15th May. 2024 at 06:37 am CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
MisterL, today at 01:44 pm CEST
-
Phillias_Md, today at 01:14 pm CEST
-
gagapapamama, today at 01:09 pm CEST
-
TanteT01, today at 01:02 pm CEST
-
Rainmann, today at 12:45 pm CEST
-
__Everhard__, today at 12:17 pm CEST
-
x00NY, today at 12:08 pm CEST
-
Hidaruma, today at 11:15 am CEST
-
cherriey, today at 10:52 am CEST
-
DerLorax, today at 09:58 am CEST
-
Donnie, today at 09:33 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, today at 09:20 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, today at 09:17 am CEST
-
Cristina123, today at 06:43 am CEST
-
Pat1991, yesterday at 08:40 pm CEST
-
Tiro0815, yesterday at 08:18 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, yesterday at 05:37 pm CEST
-
Jenges, yesterday at 03:41 pm CEST
-
WithoutWings, yesterday at 02:12 pm CEST
-
HerrNoob, yesterday at 01:38 pm CEST
-
Davilino98, yesterday at 06:18 am CEST
-
JackpotPiraten, on 16th May. 2024 at 09:20 pm CEST
-
Gemeni, on 16th May. 2024 at 05:56 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 16th May. 2024 at 05:26 pm CEST
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
@Julian
You seriously call that solved?
By the lax intervention, the user upola may make a joke about each TE first. Then comes message that he provokes and that would be unfortunate formulation?
In the end, the mod closes the thread and the stupid comment from the upola is then also still there as a kind of welcome formula for new users?
Since one can find a better solution.
The lax reference to the Meckerecke can not work at all, if a new user does not know what the Meckerecke actually is. He first sees only the topic "fraud or complaints" and would like to announce his story. Whether the story then corresponds to the rules, an experienced mod should already recognize
For this, an immediate close would have been better and a contact attempt via PN would have made more sense to find out how strong the problem is.
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
Based on your message about Upola's post earlier, I'm going to assume that you wish we should ban every user just because a sarcastic post was made.
In the "complaint case" it was ultimately only about the fact that the user had grumbled about the casino, because he has not won there, that on such contributions sarcastic answers are written, I can therefore even honestly understand.
If a user submits a complaint about the casinos, both we and the casino managers are notified about it, to be able to process the whole cases, we must therefore have an orderly overview of all complaints, if every user starts to create complaints just because he was not satisfied with the session, a complete chaos would arise with all of us.
Therefore, I have decided to close the thread, because there can be no help for it, except to point out again and again that the casinos have no influence on the gameplay.
To make the overview easier for us as well as for the respective casino managers, I have also marked it as solved.
As already mentioned in the complaint, it is of course allowed to complain about your sessions in the forum, but for this there are several threads that are more appropriate, for example "How is the April" or just the Meckerecke
Since the complaint function, as I said, is only for players who need some serious help.
With all due respect, even though we are usually open to criticism, I can't take your now 10th complaint about us seriously anymore, because in my eyes it's not serious criticism you're expressing towards us, but it feels more like a cry for attention.
Wish you a happy Easter anyway.
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Liked this post:
Blubbo33
Already in advance you have to make sure that sarcasm has no place in the complaint thread
It is not a cry for attention but I point out errors. The mistakes are at the expense of the new users on whom you push your rules and other users may exercise sarcasm with you.
By the way, my messages have already had answers from the team, where the message was also justified.
So sit down and learn the mod job again properly.
Move your butt!
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
You are really angry, but it's none of my business, only one thing,
You should first learn your grammatical spelling again
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Liked this post: E****4,
Jenn-R, 
sippi, u****n
Because of the fact that you had provoked Sabine in the Communicator, called her incompetent, attacked her unnecessarily and you generally let off all your frustration with her, and all because you were dissatisfied with a decision of our mod team (again),
i think that a little time out would not hurt you
In the meantime, please think about your behavior
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
I find it hard to block someone because of this, just because he lets out his frustration, or then you could have blocked him immediately as that was with Sabine and you could have saved the answer
And sarcasm or not, there are those who deliberately use sarcasm again and again to write it so to speak covertly. And that can be seen as insulting or provocation
And that sarcasm often plays a role in upola is obvious
Then you must also condemn those who write that you have deposited and the money was not booked, and that as an experienced gambler. And rate the casino as junk, although you should know with over 500 posts that it is mostly due to the payment providers.
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course we don't ban users just because they have a bad day or because they vent their frustration.
The community is finally focused on the topic of gambling, where such things can unfortunately happen.
Of course I agree with you.
Therefore, he was not banned at that time to give him another chance.
But if a user again and again and without a break lets off his frustration in the forum, or also insults / provokes the users or ourselves via Communicator, then I am of the opinion that a little time out could do good
Of course, exaggerated sarcasm can also be provocative, but in the reported case from above I have not classified the contribution as extraordinarily provocative.
This decision may well seem a bit harsh as an outsider, but due to the above-mentioned history and other incidents in the past, it was necessary to take action
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Liked this post:
Julian
2 weeks silent staircase for you
Be banned on a holiday, is also ne strong performance 😂😂 SeemsGood
Julian makes this for my taste but already really good, best mod mMn👍🏻 In the nodeposit thread but might like to be even tougher imo, currently ask many again for any passwords for tournaments what no one itches, can also be made in the chat corner
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unfortunately, there are a few who are not willing or just evil up to lead and therefore you can never make it all right. A compromise is the best solution and I welcome the decision of the team very much 😊
@gamblejoe keep up the good work!
This post has been translated automatically
Problem solved
Liked this post:
Falko, 
palme7777, 
RiverSong, u****n
Dear mowolum;
thank you for your contribution. I wonder what you were trying to accomplish? Aren't you ashamed to blame other people for their writing? Youre "criticism" is all about blaming other people for not having the qualities you think you have.
Does that make him a worse person in your eyes just because he can't do the "grammatical spelling" in your view?
What gives you the right to criticize and give advice to others in this regard?
Feeling strong and superior to others just because they have perceived weaknesses is what is actually weak about it.
I could write now as an example that grammar in the actual sense only determines the composition of clauses, phrases and words to whole sentences. The grammar gets along completely without spelling.I'm pretty sure that you wanted to criticize the good old orthography in your post.
Here's another grammar example
You write, "You should re-learn your grammatical spelling first."
Correctly however would be:" You should learn nevertheless first times your...... . again."
As you can see, the whole thing is not so simple, apart from the fact that the term "grammatical spelling" becomes absurd.
However, I don't hold the whole thing against you because I like you, I just want to animate you to think, whereby the glass house also plays a subordinate role.
If there are grammatical or orthographical errors here, please refrain from condemning me for it, because German is not my mother tongue and even if it were, that would not make me a worse person.
This post has been translated automatically