Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Offtopic conversations in the general no deposit / free spins thread (Page 8)

Topic created on 21st Nov. 2019 | Page: 8 of 10 | Answers: 92 | Views: 17,976
Julian
Elite
If you have any questions about this topic, please feel free to use this thread again.

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186
Expert
Julian wrote on 02/12/2019 at 10:58: Should you have any questions about this topic you are welcome to use the thread again from now on.

I would have asked you already about Communicater, what exactly means short and bound questions, at that time you said that this is still decided or voted on.
What exactly does it look like now? Because short and bound means almost nothing, because everyone can stretch the meaning to the maximum
Which of them would be such questions?
1. Does anyone have the conditions for the free spins?
2. Where can I redeem my VIP points?
3. On which slot are FS?

In my opinion 1. definitely, 2. definitely not and 3. also not.
Point 3 is either already included in the post or (just bspw. at Netbet) to find out in 2 clicks.

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
MarcT22186 wrote on 12/02/2019 at 12:47 PM
I would have asked you already about Communicater, what exactly means short and bound questions, at that time you said yes that this is still being decided or voted on.
What exactly does this look like now? Because short and bound says about almost nothing, because everyone can stretch the meaning to the maximum
Which of them would be such questions?
1. Does anyone have the conditions for the free spins?
2. Where can I redeem my VIP points?
3. On which slot are FS?

In my opinion 1. definitely, 2. definitely not and 3. also not.
Point 3 is either already included in the post or (just bspw. at Netbet) to find out in 2 clicks.

Personally, I would say from my own feeling that in your example point 1 and 3 (if they are not specified) are acceptable.
Point 2 would have no place in the thread.

Likewise, I think it is also okay if you make an addition (like if the offer of free spins is not limited to only one slot, but the free spins are also available on other slots than the one stated in the post before).

There are also many promotions of casinos where for many users is not directly visible at first glance where you can activate these free spins or can also find, here I think it is also okay to leave a note.


Edit. Posts with duplicate content will also be removed, so if, for example, a question is asked and from 3 users comes the same answer, so the whole will be reduced by us to 1 post and the other 2 posts will be deleted.

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186
Expert
I think it's time that you (admins/mods) enforce this decision more harshly - i.e. with warnings and temporary, followed by permanent bans. For new users, a warning is also sufficient at first

Imo best to release the content of the ND thread only to registered and unbanned users
The community has carried the decision almost unanimously, yet over 5 pages in a row only OT!?

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
MarcT22186 wrote on 01/13/2020 at 07:02: I think it's time you (admins/mods) enforced this decision harder - i.e. with warnings and temporary, followed by permanent bans. For new users, an admonishment will also suffice at first

Imo best to release the content of the ND thread only to registered and unbanned users
The community has carried the decision almost unanimously, yet over 5 pages in a row only OT!?

I've already written at the time that it is not feasible to enforce such a thing

You are now the first to demand penalties for it.

Gamblejoe can not do that to not lose users, and as I wrote, where do you want to start and where to stop?

If you punish or warn this must also apply to other THREADS, and already the whole thing no longer makes sense.

For me, that was clear as the Amen in church that it comes so.

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186
Expert
Blubbo33 wrote on 13.01.2020 at 07:54
I have already written that it is not feasible to enforce such a thing

You are now the first to call for penalties.

Gamblejoe can't do that so as not to lose users, and as I wrote, where do you want to start and where to stop?

If you punish or warn this must also apply to other THREADS, and already the whole thing no longer makes sense.

For me, that was clear as the Amen in church that it comes so.

I was also not for a restriction, everyone wanted that, GJ jumped on it and is now afraid to lose users?
Sorry, then they just have to expand the staff and be active 24hrs here. So this whole topic including the heated discussion was nothing but a complete waste of time...

In the long run they lose so more users, maybe I should make my idea of a Discord true.

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
MarcT22186 wrote on 13.01.2020 at 08:08
I was not for a restriction either, everyone wanted that, GJ jumped on it and is now afraid to lose users?
Sorry, then they just have to expand staff and be active 24hrs here. So this whole topic incl. the heated discussion was nothing but a complete waste of time...

In the long run they lose so more users, maybe I should make my idea of a Discord true.

I also did not vote for it because it was logical what comes out and is not feasible

Staff costs money

It was well meant by Gamblejoe, but just not feasible, a lot of wind around nothing and not well thought out from the beginning

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
With certain people I doubt then also simply in their intelligence! Can not actually be so difficult to shift these conversations in the chat corner or just write privately

Personnel costs evenly not always money. I have already offered to help them a bit. At least as far as this thread is concerned. Did not want it

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
the mods are still asleep / was weekend.
equal circles the hammer when they are awake lol

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
I have looked in the thread.
There are casinos that I have never heard of.
And then there are casinos where there were already many Bescherden about it.

Well, who needs it.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics16th Jun. 2024 at 06:02 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately