Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Important improvements are necessary (Page 4)

Topic created on 15th Jun. 2019 | Page: 4 of 6 | Answers: 50 | Views: 8,882
zuzox
Experienced
Bone wrote on 06/18/2019 00:10 PM
You don't have a cell phone or landline?

Don't most casinos now require cell phone number Verification?

And how do you even live completely without a phone. I rarely make phone calls now, but that's because I've mostly switched to messenger and social networks. But without a cell phone, most messengers are rather difficult. That leaves Facebook, but if you don't have a cell phone, landline or doorbell (WTF?!), you probably don't have Facebook.

How do you live? Do you have any social contacts at all? Do workmen never come to you or someone who reads the heating or the letter carrier?

Probably a life like the "Alaska Bush People" 😂 but with some consumption-intensive city people certainly healthy at least for a month 😜

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite

Bone wrote on 06/18/2019 00:10 PM
You don't have a cell phone or landline?

Don't most casinos now require cell phone number Verification?

And how do you even live completely without a phone. I rarely make phone calls now, but that's because I've mostly switched to messenger and social networks. But without a cell phone, most messengers are rather difficult. That leaves Facebook, but if you don't have a cell phone, landline or doorbell (WTF?!), you probably don't have Facebook.

How do you live? Do you have any social contacts at all? Do workmen never come to you or someone who reads the heating or the letter carrier?

so i have facebook, i don't need craftsmen because i can do everything myself and i have friends too but the rest of humanity goes right up my ass

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite

zuzox wrote on 06/18/2019 00:24 AM
Probably a life like from the "Alaska Bush People" 😂 but with some consumer intensive city people definitely healthy at least for a month 😜

please decide first, am i a village person or a city person now?

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
From the GJ's point of view, it's stupid to check users' IDs and keep the data safe. The effort required to do this properly is also enormous. You can argue about cell phone numbers, but the benefit is small. I think that the last change with reduced login points was very sensible, so you are forced to show more activity and so multi-accounts are easier to catch.

At the moment I think the multi account problem is not as bad as many describe, but it is good to act now before it gets really bad. You can always extend the measures and I would prefer that certain areas in the forum do not give any or only reduced points. Because some users like to make several posts in a row with three to four words of content, I do not expect great quality here but so empty posts are just not an enrichment.

This post has been translated automatically

RuhrPottProll
Amateur
Peter8 wrote on 16.06.2019 at 21:57: There are several possibilities, what I z.b in the head have who this possibility, one gives denn member the voluntary possibility z.b with ID and cell phone Nr to verify, and these people should receive the full points, then one can z.b also say ne ID is too tricky for me, wants only cell phone Nr and gets 50% of the current points
And if you do nothing voluntarily
So you get only 20% of the current points and casino and slot ratings are completely blocked for these users
So that only verified users can do that or they get points for it.
And to the accounts I would say that when you sign up, first the PM function remains off or only when the user is verified can use it...
Just time so what comes to mind ...

And...

PS; I write just so if you can not stand it, I can only say p.P

strong plan....like it, would be there! 😎🍻

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
I have to be honest, I don't recognize duplicate accounts at all.
I am always amazed how others recognize that.

This post has been translated automatically

GambleAddict777
Amateur
Dbac79 wrote on 06/17/2019 10:54 PM

there are still people who do not have a cell phone at all

As I have already written, the Verification should not be mandatory to register with gj, but exclusively for those who want to participate in the lottery. So also automatically, the cheating through multiple accounts "significantly" more difficult.
So you would not have to worry that strangers by annoying calls / SMS, disturb you .

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
upola wrote on 06/18/2019 08:59: I have to be honest,I don't recognize duplicate accounts at all.
I am always quite amazed at how others recognize it.

I don't recognize any either. I just assume due to the fact that we are in a gambling forum. Gambling is addictive, many addicts no longer have a normal understanding of morality and here money is raffled.

You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to recognize the fact that double accounts are very likely here.

Apart from that, we are on the Internet. There are probably even double accounts in the Knitting & Wool forum, which then argue with each other in the pattern thread

This post has been translated automatically

GambleAddict777
Amateur
Kleinkariert wrote on 06/18/2019 04:56: Purely from the GJ point of view, it is moronic to check ID cards of users and keep the data safe. The effort to do that properly is also huge. You can argue about cell phone numbers, but the benefit is small. I think that the last change with reduced login points was very sensible, so you are forced to show more activity and so multi-accounts are easier to catch.

At the moment I think the multi account problem is not as bad as many describe, but it is good to act now before it gets really bad. You can always extend the measures and I would prefer that certain areas in the forum do not give any or only reduced points. Because some users like to make several posts in a row with three to four words of content, I do not expect great quality here but so empty posts are just not an enrichment.

The points are only about reaching the minimum number of points to be allowed to participate in the lottery. I just wonder why the benefit of a "verification" by a cell phone number should be low?
I did not notice how far the awarding of points was reduced/changed, because I myself am not yet an active member here for so long. In my opinion, this could also have a negative impact on the quality of the contributions. Many people will feel forced to write articles to get the points. Content-wise, these will tend to fall into the "garbage" category. Consequence is that the overall quality in the forum sinks and potential "new members" deterred. I do not think that will be in the sense of the operators here. If you look at it from the commercial point of view, it is about traffic and this is generated by visitors / members.
Can you also please explain to me how through more activity multi-accounts should be caught more easily?
How can you judge if the problem with multi accounts is not so bad?

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Kleinkariert wrote on 06/18/2019 04:56: Purely from the GJ point of view, it is moronic to check ID cards of users and keep the data safe. The effort to do that properly is also huge. You can argue about cell phone numbers, but the benefit is small. I think that the last change with reduced login points was very sensible, so you are forced to show more activity and so multi-accounts are easier to catch.

At the moment I think the multi account problem is not as bad as many describe, but it is good to act now before it gets really bad. You can always extend the measures and I would prefer that certain areas in the forum do not give any or only reduced points. Because some users like to make several posts in a row with three to four words of content, I do not expect great quality here but so empty posts are just not an enrichment.

But what is the point of taking certain areas out of the points or reducing the points?
Then come just in the interesting or help threads empty words.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics13th Apr. 2024 at 08:50 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately