Dear Gamblejoe Team,
as you know, I've been active here for a long time - was one of the first members here, but had re-registered here after a few months off, so I've only been here again since December 2018.
I appreciate your tests and have registered in many a casino through you and have usually done quite well.
But what surprises me lately are your casino recommendations, for example this one from Wildz-Casino:
You write a clear descriptive report - in itself quite good - pays e.g. 20 euros, play briefly and with a little luck you pay out 50 euros, etc.
Then you give a rating if the casino has paid out e.g. in 1 day (50 euros is almost never problematic) and all members here think:
"GambleJoe has tested, all good I can engage 100% on the casino and gamble, everything will run great"
That is not so, currently prove the many complaints about the Wildz Casino.
Surely you can not for it, but before a casino is recommended to users there should be but usually an extensive longer test phase with some payouts even in the somewhat higher range.
The players here who register and Deposit money at a casino through Gamblejoe do so because they trust you and appreciate your recommendations.
Therefore, I would like to see the Gamblejoe team only recommend a casino on your site if this really corresponds to the facts.
Because it ultimately brings doubts about your competence with it, if the casinos recommended by you are not so good and the players are ultimately annoyed to have registered there.
That's my personal opinion, about your answer would be pleased here certainly many.
Gamblejoe's ulterior motive is that at some point all casinos should be listed here that exist.
And there again the ulterior motive is that it should be / can be good as well as badly rated.
Thus, you have all the casinos that exist at some point here in the rating.
The aftertaste is but just as you said that you think Gamblejoe advertises for it so I do not need to worry.
Just so it is but unfortunately not, but comes across so and that would have to change GJ.
But weren't there also some users who praised Wildz here in the forum before Gamblejoe included it on their site? This has only in the last two weeks so drastically deteriorated with the opinions on this casino.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
14th Aug. 2019, at 05:09 pm CEST#4
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
It is a very ambitious thought to want to list all existing casinos at some point. And it becomes even more ambitious when you "demand" larger sums in the payout as part of a test. That presupposes on the one hand financial power to go with his own money and perhaps also 4 or 5 times to put on as well as a lot of seat meat. You have to be somewhat broken to pull something like this off. I honestly don't trust the GJ to do that. How many casinos are there, which have a somewhat higher degree of popularity - 200? And 10 are added every day.
Perhaps this could be set up as part of a test procedure for forum members at GJ. The tester pays a Deposit with bonus and writes a reasonable report and receives 25% of his deposit max 50 EUR. Retest takes place within a period of 4 weeks and there MUST be a significant win with payout. Then there is another 25% of the made initial deposit, max 50 EUR. Attention: Only the basic structure of a proposal.
Gamer777 wrote on 08/14/2019 at 16:36: Dear Gamblejoe Team,
as you know I've been active here for a long time - was one of the first members here, but had re-registered here after a few months off, so I've only been back here since December 2018.
I appreciate your tests and have registered in many a casino through you and have usually done quite well.
But what surprises me lately are your casino recommendations, for example this one from Wildz-Casino:
You write a clear descriptive report - in itself quite good - pays e.g. 20 euros, play briefly and with a little luck you pay out 50 euros, etc.
Then you give a rating if the casino has paid out e.g. in 1 day (50 euros is almost never problematic) and all members here think:
"GambleJoe has tested, all good I can engage 100% on the casino and gamble, everything will run great"
That is not so, currently prove the many complaints about the Wildz Casino.
Surely you can not for it, but before a casino is recommended to users there should be but usually an extensive longer test phase with some payouts even in the somewhat higher range.
The players here who register and Deposit money at a casino through Gamblejoe do so because they trust you and appreciate your recommendations.
Therefore, I would like to see the Gamblejoe team only recommend a casino on your site if this really corresponds to the facts.
Because it ultimately brings doubts about your competence with it, if the casinos recommended by you are not so good and the players are ultimately annoyed to have registered there.
That's my personal opinion, about your answer would be pleased here certainly many.
Hello Gamer777,
i try to present my tests as transparent as possible
The Wildz Casino news article is a first short test, as the title "Wildz: The new online casino in the first short test" already makes clear. The short test had resulted in a total of 3 hours of video material. As described in the test, I deposited 2 times 25€ and paid out 80€ in the end
Sure it's not 1,000€ like Matthias pays out in some High Roller sessions, but my playing time is sometimes significantly longer than his. In addition, mostly new players pay to try out according to the casinos rather first smaller amounts, sometimes under 25€. We also want to make these first tests authentic.
I had stated in the test report that I received a confirmation of the withdrawal after 15 hours and after 3 days the money was on my Visa account. These were my first experiences at Wildz Casino. At that time, the casino was well positioned in this area.
We picked up Wildz based on several recommendations from the community. The test was 14 days ago and at that time there were no problems with withdrawals through the casino. If that was the case, I would have written it as I mentioned SlottyVegas or Lapalingo.
Meanwhile, it must be said that Wildz is advertised by several streamers, among others MontanaBlack also plays there regularly. He played there last night, 70,000 people watched him - the reach is significantly higher, so the number of players is also increasing
The casino has admitted that they have more players and are behind on processing payouts, especially since they also have a staff member down and lack resources. It seems they are already working 16-hour shifts in Malta. However, Wildz tries to process them as quickly as possible, unfortunately sometimes with processing times of a week.
The casino is currently listed in 46th place with us. I had described some oddities in my test.
Furthermore, there are the community ratings for Wild Casino. If you look at them, you can see that there are currently some problems with the payout times. That is why the user ratings are so important to us - nevertheless, the overall payout ratings are relatively good with 4 stars
Surely you could test the Online Casinos longer, but ultimately, many users want to quickly see the latest casinos in our comparison. There are almost daily new suggestions for casinos, which we should list here. Therefore, we had decided to proceed with a first short test for new casinos. The actual test will follow
You also have to see that GambleJoe does not only consist of the tests. There is the forum, where new spammers keep appearing on the scene, the news, the review of casino ratings and the resulting discussions with users, as well as many other puzzle pieces
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
14th Aug. 2019, at 06:26 pm CEST#6
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Here I have a request to all users.
I often read how here in the threads about certain casinos is scolded, if I then look in the casino reviews is nothing to find there.
If you have made such negative experiences, it uses nothing to write his frustration only here from the soul, better to do this in the casino reviews kund.
So the other users who are interested in the casino immediately see if there is something wrong and there are problems. Here in the forum it goes sometime completely under
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
14th Aug. 2019, at 06:48 pm CEST#7
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I had once 1.5 years ago also suggested to mention whether bonus with Neteller goes that one writes that to it
It was positively received but why was not made that was me really intressieren
About an answer I would be happy because at half of the casinos neteller and bonus does not go and at agb it is hard to find
Sry for offtopic but did not want to open a new topic has yes also to do with ratings
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
14th Aug. 2019, at 08:18 pm CEST#8
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Christoph,
Thank you for your effort to write such a detailed answer here !
I understand exactly how you mean it and agree with you.
I do not know the exact circumstances, possibly the casino is a bit overwhelmed at the moment.
And yes, I admit, you can not expect the every casino with thousands of euros in deposits and withdrawals tested, I had not considered.
If my criticism was taken by you as too critical I would like to apologize for that.
Just one more point:
GambleJoe does great promotions, like the PSC lotteries and of course has to earn money by recruiting new players, that's quite understandable.
In the meantime, I think that Gamblejoe is the best website incl. forum in the German-speaking area, so to speak from players for players.
But just for this reason, the site is almost considered an institution when inexperienced casino players are looking for a good casino, where you can play and in the event of a win, the payouts work without problems
The larger your site becomes, the more casinos will also approach you with the request for cooperation, and just as now in example with WildzCasino you then also have a certain power and opportunities to show the casino that it must also work seriously so that you advertise for it.
And a casino what more and more players the payout difficult should at least temporarily then not be advertised until the casino works properly again.
Falko wrote on 14.08.2019 at 17:01: But were not there also some users who Wildz here in the forum have highly praised, before it Gamblejoe has included on their page ? That has but in the last two weeks so drastically deteriorated with the opinions on this casino
That's exactly how it was, the casino was suddenly promoted by many streamers and here people have reported good experiences with the casino and asked to take it up here. So it couldn't be tested through for a long time at all. Anyway, at least here I can not blame the GJ team, as the users have shot too quickly.
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
14th Aug. 2019, at 10:53 pm CEST#10
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
It might be nice to have some features and customizations:
1. Users can specify a casino in such problem posts (e.g. drop down menu or there is a detection mechanism like conversion to links). If many problems have been reported lately, this will be displayed as a warning at the top of the casino comparison pages.
2. Users can choose 1 casino where everything went smoothly. Only the ratings of active users for 2 months are valid.
3. Recommendation in the rating Yes/No/No indication. The whole thing should then be graphically visible on the individual pages, e.g. 17% recommend SlotsMillion, 30% advise against it (53% no indication).
And with the Gamblejoe team it would be interesting how the individual members stand to the respective casino. Whereby that would only be a nice info.
By the way, I don't find the thread too critical, it's just right and something like that should be questioned.
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Liked this post: Anonym,
Klempo77
as you know, I've been active here for a long time - was one of the first members here, but had re-registered here after a few months off, so I've only been here again since December 2018.
I appreciate your tests and have registered in many a casino through you and have usually done quite well.
But what surprises me lately are your casino recommendations, for example this one from Wildz-Casino:
https://www.gamblejoe.com/news/wildz-casino-erster-test-und-erfahrungen
You write a clear descriptive report - in itself quite good - pays e.g. 20 euros, play briefly and with a little luck you pay out 50 euros, etc.
Then you give a rating if the casino has paid out e.g. in 1 day (50 euros is almost never problematic) and all members here think:
"GambleJoe has tested, all good I can engage 100% on the casino and gamble, everything will run great"
That is not so, currently prove the many complaints about the Wildz Casino.
Surely you can not for it, but before a casino is recommended to users there should be but usually an extensive longer test phase with some payouts even in the somewhat higher range.
The players here who register and Deposit money at a casino through Gamblejoe do so because they trust you and appreciate your recommendations.
Therefore, I would like to see the Gamblejoe team only recommend a casino on your site if this really corresponds to the facts.
Because it ultimately brings doubts about your competence with it, if the casinos recommended by you are not so good and the players are ultimately annoyed to have registered there.
That's my personal opinion, about your answer would be pleased here certainly many.
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Liked this post: Anonym,
Klempo77
And there again the ulterior motive is that it should be / can be good as well as badly rated.
Thus, you have all the casinos that exist at some point here in the rating.
The aftertaste is but just as you said that you think Gamblejoe advertises for it so I do not need to worry.
Just so it is but unfortunately not, but comes across so and that would have to change GJ.
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Liked this post:
Julian
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Perhaps this could be set up as part of a test procedure for forum members at GJ. The tester pays a Deposit with bonus and writes a reasonable report and receives 25% of his deposit max 50 EUR. Retest takes place within a period of 4 weeks and there MUST be a significant win with payout. Then there is another 25% of the made initial deposit, max 50 EUR. Attention: Only the basic structure of a proposal.
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Liked this post:
garfield68, 
Klempo77
Hello Gamer777,
i try to present my tests as transparent as possible
The Wildz Casino news article is a first short test, as the title "Wildz: The new online casino in the first short test" already makes clear. The short test had resulted in a total of 3 hours of video material. As described in the test, I deposited 2 times 25€ and paid out 80€ in the end
Sure it's not 1,000€ like Matthias pays out in some High Roller sessions, but my playing time is sometimes significantly longer than his. In addition, mostly new players pay to try out according to the casinos rather first smaller amounts, sometimes under 25€. We also want to make these first tests authentic.
I had stated in the test report that I received a confirmation of the withdrawal after 15 hours and after 3 days the money was on my Visa account. These were my first experiences at Wildz Casino. At that time, the casino was well positioned in this area.
We picked up Wildz based on several recommendations from the community. The test was 14 days ago and at that time there were no problems with withdrawals through the casino. If that was the case, I would have written it as I mentioned SlottyVegas or Lapalingo.
Meanwhile, it must be said that Wildz is advertised by several streamers, among others MontanaBlack also plays there regularly. He played there last night, 70,000 people watched him - the reach is significantly higher, so the number of players is also increasing
The casino has admitted that they have more players and are behind on processing payouts, especially since they also have a staff member down and lack resources. It seems they are already working 16-hour shifts in Malta. However, Wildz tries to process them as quickly as possible, unfortunately sometimes with processing times of a week.
The casino is currently listed in 46th place with us. I had described some oddities in my test.
Furthermore, there are the community ratings for Wild Casino. If you look at them, you can see that there are currently some problems with the payout times. That is why the user ratings are so important to us - nevertheless, the overall payout ratings are relatively good with 4 stars
Surely you could test the Online Casinos longer, but ultimately, many users want to quickly see the latest casinos in our comparison. There are almost daily new suggestions for casinos, which we should list here. Therefore, we had decided to proceed with a first short test for new casinos. The actual test will follow
You also have to see that GambleJoe does not only consist of the tests. There is the forum, where new spammers keep appearing on the scene, the news, the review of casino ratings and the resulting discussions with users, as well as many other puzzle pieces
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I often read how here in the threads about certain casinos is scolded, if I then look in the casino reviews is nothing to find there.
If you have made such negative experiences, it uses nothing to write his frustration only here from the soul, better to do this in the casino reviews kund.
So the other users who are interested in the casino immediately see if there is something wrong and there are problems. Here in the forum it goes sometime completely under
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
It was positively received but why was not made that was me really intressieren
About an answer I would be happy because at half of the casinos neteller and bonus does not go and at agb it is hard to find
Sry for offtopic but did not want to open a new topic has yes also to do with ratings
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thank you for your effort to write such a detailed answer here !
I understand exactly how you mean it and agree with you.
I do not know the exact circumstances, possibly the casino is a bit overwhelmed at the moment.
And yes, I admit, you can not expect the every casino with thousands of euros in deposits and withdrawals tested, I had not considered.
If my criticism was taken by you as too critical I would like to apologize for that.
Just one more point:
GambleJoe does great promotions, like the PSC lotteries and of course has to earn money by recruiting new players, that's quite understandable.
In the meantime, I think that Gamblejoe is the best website incl. forum in the German-speaking area, so to speak from players for players.
But just for this reason, the site is almost considered an institution when inexperienced casino players are looking for a good casino, where you can play and in the event of a win, the payouts work without problems
The larger your site becomes, the more casinos will also approach you with the request for cooperation, and just as now in example with WildzCasino you then also have a certain power and opportunities to show the casino that it must also work seriously so that you advertise for it.
And a casino what more and more players the payout difficult should at least temporarily then not be advertised until the casino works properly again.
That's just my point of view.
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Liked this post:
Falko
That's exactly how it was, the casino was suddenly promoted by many streamers and here people have reported good experiences with the casino and asked to take it up here. So it couldn't be tested through for a long time at all. Anyway, at least here I can not blame the GJ team, as the users have shot too quickly.
This post has been translated automatically
Casino recommendations from Gamblejoe - Why are casinos not tested better ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
1. Users can specify a casino in such problem posts (e.g. drop down menu or there is a detection mechanism like conversion to links). If many problems have been reported lately, this will be displayed as a warning at the top of the casino comparison pages.
2. Users can choose 1 casino where everything went smoothly. Only the ratings of active users for 2 months are valid.
3. Recommendation in the rating Yes/No/No indication. The whole thing should then be graphically visible on the individual pages, e.g. 17% recommend SlotsMillion, 30% advise against it (53% no indication).
And with the Gamblejoe team it would be interesting how the individual members stand to the respective casino. Whereby that would only be a nice info.
By the way, I don't find the thread too critical, it's just right and something like that should be questioned.
This post has been translated automatically