Tribeholz wrote on 22.05.2020 at 00:09 clock: So from my side runs everything right to, can believe.
I am neither Cheeseburger - nor Cheeseburger is me...
That sounds almost as if I still have to apologize that...äähh sorry...that I figured out the solution!!!
Is already a pretty wacky forum...
for a profit determination it is here first of all completely irrelevant whether you are now really a double id or his buddy or the like.
have already made many lotteries here and if a lottery itself sets its conditions as follows and requires
i quote Who first posts the complete grammatically correct text in here, wins the PSC.
Also here a special feature: Who solves the puzzle within the first 24 hours (which is extremely unlikely, but still possible) wins a 100 PSC.
and these are also given with numbers then there is unfortunately no room for maneuver at all
you have written this 2. the one with 12 - 4 - 26 as the one with 12 - 4 - 26 - 26 as your solution although only 3 (grammatically correct) numbers were given and according to the concrete conditions of the lottery this is not a grammatically correct solution and therefore wrong.
also your objection that it must be called actually --> that <-- changes nothing at the difference between that and that and is already for a long time the usual way of writing.
one can not even talk here of writing off because jenn-r has certainly not cared about your post but immediately after his research it then posted as soon as possible purely. besides, he has not made your mistake.
I would leave it to the TE how he regulates it. You should consider that it was the first to solve what is really a good performance. Even if it was not grammatically correct.
small PSC lottery with potential
Nobody has liked this post so far
"would be".
not "who"
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post:
RiverSong, 
Saphira
It's just (unfortunately) the rules.
But regardless of that, I'm very skeptical about whether everything here is above board.
Think the mods will certainly look at it again and then hopefully react accordingly, if it is a bad troll and a fake holds
For this speaks yes also the sudden new registration of the da.
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post:
Jenn-R, 
RiverSong, 
Saphira
Must go to Jenn-R according to rules, congratulations
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post:
Jenn-R, 
RiverSong
i see the same
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Nobody has liked this post so far
So from my side everything runs legally, can believe.
I am neither Cheeseburger - nor is Cheeseburger me...
That sounds almost as if I still have to apologize that...äähh sorry...that I figured out the solution!!!
Is already a pretty freaky forum...
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
for a profit determination it is here first of all completely irrelevant whether you are now really a double id or his buddy or the like.
have already made many lotteries here and if a lottery itself sets its conditions as follows and requires
i quote
Who first posts the complete grammatically correct text in here, wins the PSC.
Also here a special feature: Who solves the puzzle within the first 24 hours (which is extremely unlikely, but still possible) wins a 100 PSC.
and these are also given with numbers then there is unfortunately no room for maneuver at all
you have written this 2. the one with 12 - 4 - 26 as the one with 12 - 4 - 26 - 26 as your solution although only 3 (grammatically correct) numbers were given and according to the concrete conditions of the lottery this is not a grammatically correct solution and therefore wrong.
also your objection that it must be called actually --> that <-- changes nothing at the difference between that and that and is already for a long time the usual way of writing.
one can not even talk here of writing off because jenn-r has certainly not cared about your post but immediately after his research it then posted as soon as possible purely. besides, he has not made your mistake.
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Liked this post: T****z
This post has been translated automatically
small PSC lottery with potential
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically