-
Dan__, today at 04:37 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 09:12 pm CEST
-
Spielheld, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:47 pm CEST
-
Druff, on 8th May. 2025 at 07:15 pm CEST
-
Rasmik12, today at 07:17 am CEST
-
ExCaL, today at 05:20 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 02:18 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:05 am CEST
-
sundance, yesterday at 10:51 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 08:35 pm CEST
-
bruffl, yesterday at 08:12 pm CEST
-
fros7byte, yesterday at 06:32 pm CEST
-
DerLorax, yesterday at 06:04 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:52 pm CEST
-
Donnie, yesterday at 11:28 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, yesterday at 11:14 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 10:56 am CEST
-
Bonusfan, yesterday at 10:48 am CEST
-
Labi95, yesterday at 09:21 am CEST
-
Viktoria671970, yesterday at 02:22 am CEST
-
Gamer, on 8th May. 2025 at 05:39 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 8th May. 2025 at 01:22 pm CEST
-
Labi95, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:04 am CEST
-
Donnie, on 8th May. 2025 at 09:48 am CEST
-
x00NY, on 8th May. 2025 at 12:02 am CEST
-
Sanioli, on 7th May. 2025 at 11:40 pm CEST
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
I know the origin of this word, that was never the point. Words change their meaning in the course of time. Among other things, I am also concerned with the use in this forum. There is a special subforum here. In this forum, everything that is suspected by players but cannot be proven, should be discussed. It does not matter whether it is complete nonsense or possibly has a true core.
Conspiracy theory can be used without considering the origin, as it has been established in the meantime. For my sake, we can also delete the partial word "conspiracy", since this is actually not 100% correct, and simply switch to "theories". Or to "fraud theories", whoever prefers that. The key thing is that these are all just theories. And therefore belong in their own subforum
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
just for the sake of completeness, even if you are not interested --> gj is the most accommodating forum what exists
was / am in several, in one it really is, there are no public discussions about someone's lock or similar, tolerated. the person can contact the mod by pn, sometimes he comes back, sometimes not, this is strict but effective. and they have millions of users
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym,
RiverSong
1. have you ever deleted yourself and are back at the start here?
rhetorical question
2. your opening post (the rest I have only roughly skimmed)
first I thought, hhmm has boredom and too much time
you accuse everyone in your opening post just times
--> gj, which you dedicate a whole big paragraph how strictly evil they are to the users and then write à but that's not the point (post I have already pure)
--> you really want to know the reporter and why this.....with examples even......
hhm, why only?
--> that was not it yet....as hoeness once said ... . have once studied psychology for a while, so I also looked at a few of your posts and see here is the solution in it.
with the report button and your realization that some have reported you, it all came back up and then this here
quotes 711 seveneleven
--> Maybe you should take the stick out of your butt too
--> Put the cane back in your pocket
--> still a third one recently which was probably addressed to me but quickly deleted by you, similar like
--> otherwise there is again with the stick on the palm of your hand
you have been in your time a mobbing or cane victim (as they used to say)
and now to your kindergarten and elementary school examples
i am right that you are the schackeline or the kevin (maybe you changed your name because of the example).
that the appearance of the report button (according to counter there are messages since the beginning, only in the background) and your previous frustration that someone has dared to report you and even several times,
--> are the trigger
--> has suddenly reminded you of the time from before, you have never overcome the trauma of the snitches against you.
if you wirklcih before your registration 2 years have read along and you still --> free <-- vorkamst dann hast du deine erlebnisse bis zur eröffnung des threads erfolgreich aber unbewusst unterdrückt.
du darfst mich jetzt gerne melden, ich bitte sogar darum, denn es deckt nur dein trauriges schicksal, welches ich nicht weiter vertiefen werde, auf und es sind keine beleidigungen o.ä. in meinem text
bevor du jetzt aber meinst zum angriff gegen mich übergehen zu müssen (so wie du auf fast jeden post hier mit nonsens geantwortet und versucht hast abzulenken (diesmal ist kaffeelichts analyse schon teilweise richtig)
-->I would have this and that and bla,
do not fret
tomorrow is also again lottery and there you can forget everything for a short time, before you dedicate yourself probably afterwards again to this thread in which it is only about the therapy of your childhood trauma. wish you nevertheless much success thereby:-P
and i have already left you a few coins in an envelope so that you can buy some sweets
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: 9****f, Anonym, Anonym
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
For me it is normal that I engage directly with my interlocutor - in the case that was just you. That is, of course, I then choose as an example you and not the user SweetBumblebee1965, to explain certain statements that I make, if necessary in more detail. Why? Because that is m.E. only fair and because the chances are besides larger that one, if one argues directly with one another not at each other past talks. However, since you don't seem to grasp the personal level and (once again) just feel attacked (which I - seriously - find really unfortunate), it really doesn't make sense to deal with you in more detail in this way
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: 9****f, Anonym,
SevenEleven
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't know, but it sounds logical that the frustration due to losses is decisive for the mood here. In the end, however, the reasons are beside the point... The fact is, I find it annoying that the fun of the game is slipping more and more into the background here
Nutty chat: A few weeks ago, I ended up with two casino employees in one or at the bar . I told them at some point that I had recently started playing online. They asked me if I was familiar with the topic (OC) and I told them with a proud chest that I am a user in the world's best (*g*) gambling forum and that you can feel quite safe/secure there - despite the legal gray area - because the forum operators and the team present themselves well and cleverly and they even help you if necessary when there are difficulties. Of course they immediately asked which forum I meant. I answered: "Well, which one - GambleJoe of course". Then they looked at each other for a moment, grinned and said: "But that's not the forum with the green bar, which is run by a Danny or something like that (they meant Daniel ), is it? Isn't that the forum where so many users just vent their frustrations and constantly claim that most OCs just cheat them anyway?" Of course I negated that etc. ... is also unimportant, what we then still so spoke, BUT what I wanted to get at...
... in this point one could speak just also of a business-damaging occurrence "of the GJ users" (I thought straight no better formulation, therefore in quotation marks). Which is why I, as the operator, would only tolerate a certain amount of - to put it bluntly - "Alles Betruuuuug"-crying. Because the two guys I met there are certainly not the only casino employees who know GambleJoe. Also in many Online Casinos, the term GJ should certainly not be completely unknown.
I, for one, am glad and grateful that this forum exists because it gives me a safe feeling when gambling or choosing OCs. And because that's the case, I'd never just 'etch around' here. And if I ever feel (almost) just cheated, I won't play anymore
Amen, right?
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: 9****f, Anonym
"I studied psychology for a while, so I also looked at a few of your posts and see that here is the solution."
You are probably right with your analysis of me. Oh, what am I saying... "probably"? ... CERTAINLY you are right. Absolutely even! After all, you have studied psychology for a while, so you can say something like above. (Puuuuh, luck had that you have not finished studying, otherwise I would have had here nothing more to laugh)
----------
"you are allowed to report me now, i even ask for it, because it only reveals your sad fate, which i will not deepen further, and there are no insults or similar in my text."
Eeeh, why should I report you? I don't understand. Seriously - I am zero bothered by your assessments of me. And I also hope the moderators don't delete your post. For all those who can think further than you can throw them, you have made it very clear what you have in you (not only in psychological knowledge (!) ).
Many greetings
Schackline-Kevin
Edit wg. line formatting *sigh
</-->
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym
But for the fact that all the posts don't bother you, you answer them very extensively, dear Kevin
This post has been translated automatically