Max_Bet wrote on 11/25/2022 at 9:22 pm: You could tighten it up a bit more by having B block A's self-created secondary account at Oasis.
How does A get out of it again?
*Sorry could not edit more
Such scenes as you have described here have certainly also happened in partnerships, when one is really addicted and for the other, on the other hand, this is an absolute red rag
Such scenes as you have described them here are certainly in partnerships also already happened exactly, if one is really addicted and for the other one against it is an absolute red cloth
Regardless of whether it is justified or not, this would be a strong intervention
By A going to the lawyer and having the IP's checked
Do you mean that simple? IP can be from the InetCafe around the corner?
And will A receive the requested payout?
Falko wrote on 25.11.2022 at 22:51
Such scenes as you have described them here are certainly in partnerships also already happened exactly, if one is really addicted and for the other one against it is an absolute red cloth
I also think that this is not so absurd
I fell out with a good buddy years ago because of gambling. Now I've read a few times about Oasis problems and wondered if something like this would work?
Max_Bet wrote on 11/25/2022 at 8:47 PM: What if actually:
A and B know each other. They are good acquaintances, have known each other for a long time.
A tells B that he plays in the online casino and also in which.
B secretly opens a second account with A's data, except for the e-mail address
At the latest, this would be noticed during A's next withdrawal attempt and the accounts would be blocked immediately.
How can A prove that he is innocent?
I once had such a case and the casino has insisted, both accounts must verify with selfie and co... to relate it to your case, person B will not verify but person A. At that time, person B was blocked and person A could continue to play normally. How this looks with OASIS, I do not know.
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
ruhrpott
Carlos confirmed that Fantasino will soon be "closed".
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yup email from Fanta was in the mailbox today
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
A and B know each other. They are good acquaintances and have known each other for a long time.
A tells B that he plays in an online casino and also in which one.
B secretly opens a second account with A's data, except for the e-mail address
At the latest, this would be noticed during A's next withdrawal attempt and the accounts would be blocked immediately.
How can A prove that he is innocent?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
How does A get out of it?
*Sorry could not edit more
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
By A going to the lawyer and having the IP's checked
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
Such scenes as you have described here have certainly also happened in partnerships, when one is really addicted and for the other, on the other hand, this is an absolute red rag
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Regardless of whether it is justified or not, this would be a strong intervention
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do you mean that simple? IP can be from the InetCafe around the corner?
And will A receive the requested payout?
I also think that this is not so absurd
I fell out with a good buddy years ago because of gambling. Now I've read a few times about Oasis problems and wondered if something like this would work?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
I once had such a case and the casino has insisted, both accounts must verify with selfie and co... to relate it to your case, person B will not verify but person A. At that time, person B was blocked and person A could continue to play normally. How this looks with OASIS, I do not know.
This post has been translated automatically