Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Community surveys: Would you temporarily do without the coins for troubleshooting and casino reviews? (Page 3)

Topic created on 16th Feb. 2023 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 42 | Views: 2,919
Blubbo33
Elite

Xavi22 wrote on 02/17/2023 at 12:58 PM:

So first I want to tell you again that I did not call you stupid or moronic. I just think your statements in this area are moronic and I stand by that.


I agree with you that there are vultures here and all over the world who only take and give nothing. However, this was not invented by the people here in the forum, but has simply become so established in the world. I also don't understand your comparison with the monthly draw. So you would rather that more people are rewarded in the monthly raffle than people who invest time here and actively work on the site (I'm just counting reviews and bug hunts now). So you'd rather reward people who wish us a nice day every day in the chat corner (sorry, Denjo, but find it amusing ) with the GJ Coins? Does not make sense to me.

In addition - and I repeat myself again - this is an offer from GJ. If you get a bonus of 100% from Tipico or whoever in your mailbox or Amazon offers you 50% on your next purchase, do you turn it down because the company is doing so badly? Probably not, right? As I said, the offer has a certain added value for the company and the site, which can be seen in the user numbers and so on.

And on the last point: Actually, I didn't want to write anything about this, but just as an aside: I like to participate in lotteries, sweepstakes and the like. It is simply fun for me. But I have also given something back to the community. Alone with my puzzle/lottery last year. I think you had even participated. I don't remember anything similar from you though.

You don't have to remember, just if you participated!


I also do not boast about having given anything!

It's just a survey of a user, I do not understand why so many here go off like a bouncy ball !?!

To bring the forum here to explode I could start the next poll and ask if one would be willing to donate the monthly draw completely !?!
What would be going on then!?

I find the behavior of some simply exaggerated!
You want and will not take away anything!

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert

Blubbo33 wrote on 02/17/2023 at 13:09:

You don't have to remember, is enough if you participated!


I also do not boast about having given anything !

It's just a poll of a user, I do not understand why so many here go off like a bouncy ball !?!

To bring the forum here to explode I could start the next poll and ask if one would be willing to donate the monthly raffle completely !?!
What would be going on then!?

I find the behavior of some simply exaggerated!
You want and will not take away anything!

I do not care about the survey. The Umfage ansich is totally ok. I'm about your statements in relation to rapacious and Co. Exactly the statement to which I responded in my first post.

This post has been translated automatically

hustlehoff
Expert

Blubbo33 wrote on 17.02.2023 at 12:28 Clock:
For that you want to grab nothing but you are in every lottery, so much for pseudo or ass kissing!

I knew that such a discussion comes out, because actually only those can get upset for which it is about "what".

However, you fail to realize all the time that it is a survey and not a decision!
And of course Gamblejoe decides alone, it needs no polls!

How can I suck up to Gamblejoe when I have no power to decide !?!

You can see how dangerous polls can be for the forum when it comes to "something" !
Maybe they should be abolished again !?!

In any case, this poll brings back some mood purely !

And now you want me as proof that I am so active here in the forum, even if there is nothing, that I exclude myself from all lotteries or what? Was clear that something like this comes when you no longer know xD just bullshit. Of course, you do there with even automatically, yet it would not matter to me would not give it. Have I said in previous 2 x posts, only I do not always so on good guy with pseudo helper syndrome who wants to take the initiative to save something or to save from financial ruin lol if the nedmehr can afford it because there is Zuwenig income, then they simply halve this or leave compensation completely away your action with survey just comes across that you want to represent you so that you are oh so compassionate thoughts and what to call into being, where now everyone pulls together and you save everything together or so check the sense behind it just still not xD

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Perhaps the question should have been phrased differently. Not whether one would do without it, but whether one would still participate in the two things (troubleshooting and reward) without the reward. That would have been an interesting thing, even for GJ.

Otherwise, 3 pages of completely unnecessary discussion here now. The survey was created, done.
If you now start every survey that does not fit to question, you can the feature (which apparently many wanted), also knock again in the barrel.

This post has been translated automatically

Sir_Gambleot
Amateur
As long as Gamblejoe still supports the Gammix booths I see the compensation as compensation

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
Stromberg wrote on 02/17/2023 at 13:24: Perhaps the question should have been phrased differently. Not whether you would do without it, but whether you would still participate in the two things (debugging and reward) without the reward. That would have been an interesting thing to do, even for GJ.

your turn

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend

RiverSong wrote on 02/17/2023 at 1:41 pm:
your turn


What do you mean, what's my turn? 🤔

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend

Stromberg wrote on 02/17/2023 at 1:47 pm: What do you mean, what's my turn? 🤔

with your interesting question as a survey

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
RiverSong wrote on 02/17/2023 at 1:51 pm:

with your interesting question as a poll

Aso 😅 nah, the question are too similar for that now I think...


But I can answer them....
I would only write a review if I am extremely disappointed or extremely enthusiastic about a casino.

Troubleshooting I only did in the beginning when it was teeming with them. And also honestly only because of the coins.
Without "consideration" I go then but rather clean the joints in the garden, that's a little more exciting.... 😬 After all, it is a commercial website, and not the user's job to correct mistakes. If one or the other psc thereby earned, win win... If the then lands in one of the advertised casinos... Win win win

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
The survey seems to be quite polarizing...

First of all, I would like to mention for clarification that we at GJ are currently not thinking about completely abolishing the remuneration of error messages.
As Matthias had already written on Thursday, only the remuneration of the processed error messages was adjusted.

Of course we think it is appropriate to reward the cooperation of the community, because you help us to improve our portal.
Nevertheless, we very much appreciate the intention of Blubbo33's survey.
And I personally found the reaction to it for the purpose of "pseudo solidarity and ass kissing" quite inappropriate.

In general, I find it pretty inappropriate that you guys are pulling your hair like this here.
Our actions and lotteries do not have the goal to divide the community.
On the contrary, we actually want to make the community happy.

That's why I find it very unfortunate in some places that some members have to be accused of "greed".
Personally, I don't think that's right.


This post has been translated automatically

Denjo889
Experienced

Xavi22 wrote on 02/17/2023 at 12:58 PM:

So first I want to tell you again that I did not call you stupid or moronic. I just think your statements in this area are moronic and I stand by that.


I agree with you that there are vultures here and all over the world who only take and give nothing. However, this was not invented by the people here in the forum, but has simply become so established in the world. I also don't understand your comparison with the monthly draw. So you prefer that more people are rewarded in the monthly raffle than people who invest time here and actively work on the site (I just count reviews and bug hunts now). So you'd rather reward people who wish us a nice day every day in the chat corner (sorry, Denjo, but find it amusing ) with the GJ Coins? Does not make sense to me.

In addition - and I repeat myself again - this is an offer from GJ. If you get a bonus of 100% from Tipico or whoever in your mailbox or Amazon offers you 50% on your next purchase, do you turn it down because the company is doing so badly? Probably not, right? As I said, the offer has a certain added value for the company and the site, which can be seen in the user numbers and so on.

And on the last point: Actually, I didn't want to write anything about this, but just as an aside: I like to participate in lotteries, sweepstakes and the like. It is simply fun for me. But I have also given something back to the community. Alone with my puzzle/lottery last year. I think you had even participated. I don't remember anything similar from you though.

All good my dear 😂🤗weiss yes how it is meant .

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Xavi22 wrote on 02/17/2023 at 10:40 AM:

Sorry, but what kind of stupid statement is that?


The GJ Coins for bug reports, the "money" for the ratings and also the coins for the polls were all created by the GJ team itself. I don't remember the "greedy" community demanding new things with earning potential every day. Of course there are always a few exceptions, but in the end these things are aimed at GJ interests and are gratefully accepted by parts of the community.

But your statements here read like the stricken Samaritan (in this case GJ) should absolutely be helped now and immediately without anyone asking for help. To this I say again: This Coins story has also an added value for GJ, which can be seen clearly in the number of participants of the monthly lottery. In addition, I am also convinced that the number of registrations at new casinos via GJ will increase noticeably in the future. It is clear that it is not easy at the moment, but GJ is ultimately a business enterprise that gives me the impression that it is being managed in a capable manner.

Parts of the community but want to discredit through such a thread, I find somehow moronic.



The question is still when the use of GJ exceeds the framework because seen in this way is also a help with a casino problem a case where GJ costs money although not directly by distribution but still sits a paid worker at something where you could do in the time vill 5 other things


Sure the actions of GJ are created and also wanted but if it were my company I would have at least also the concerns as a setting of it on the community affects how many jump off e.g.? These are all things where you can estimate in advance very difficult and so the smallest change can theoretically have big consequences

So I don't see anything wrong with someone opening a thread where people openly share how they would feel about something like this and that may also help GJ to make an assessment of what steps are good and what will not be so well received

In the end we all have a good time here and if you are honest the active people in the forum are a very cool bunch despite many differences of opinion

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert

gamble1 wrote on 02/17/2023 at 2:44 pm:

The question is nevertheless when the use of GJ exceeds the framework because so seen also a help with a casino problem is a case where GJ costs money indeed not directly by distribution but nevertheless a paid manpower sits at something where one could do in the time vill 5 other things


Sure the actions of GJ are created and also wanted but if it were my company I would have at least also the concerns as a setting of it on the community affects how many jump off e.g.? These are all things where you can estimate in advance very difficult and so the smallest change can theoretically have big consequences

So I don't see anything wrong with someone opening a thread where people openly share how they would feel about something like this and that may also help GJ to make an assessment of what steps are good and what will not be so well received

In the end we all have a good time here and if you are honest the active people in the forum are a very cool bunch despite many differences of opinion

Of course, every company has to decide for itself when it's time to end a campaign. And as I said, I think GJ is capable of assessing this correctly. As mentioned above, it's not about the survey. Discussions are great, so that you can hear other opinions and see different things from a different point of view.


What bothered me was the statement that everyone who votes "no" in this survey is greedy and should support GJ. It's just an offer from the company. Or are you greedy if you accept the 100% bonus at the casino, if you get your next coffee at Tchibo for free because of loyalty points, or if you redeem your credit card points for a nice gift? I find this statement just nonsense, otherwise I have nothing against a burning discussion

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics10th May. 2024 at 03:44 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately