Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Highest wins completely played back down in the same casino (Page 6)

Topic created on 02nd May. 2018 | Page: 6 of 9 | Answers: 81 | Views: 30,698
Anonym
capriz wrote on 20.01.2019 at 10:19 am: Find his criticism already justified. It is traded with money which is actually not available. The best example is Lottoland, which bets on the lotto Jackpot being hit or not. Whether they really gave the winner with which they have advertised, the coal, of course, also remains slippery

The whole stalling tactics of the casinos to pay out money, restriction of payout limits shows that many companies trade with money they do not have.

I think that you have to differentiate. Trading with money you do not have and the value of money are two different things. There is also only 8% of the money in coins and bills, 92% exists only virtually. The thing about casino payouts and limits/stalling tactics/... also has almost nothing to do with the subject matter. Casinos that use stalling tactics are fraudsters in my eyes, according to almost all online casinos.

The few that don't pay out quickly or offer the option of not being able to cancel. Any casino that takes longer than 24 hours to confirm is extremely bad, any that takes longer than 8 hours on weekdays is acceptable. The only reason it takes longer is that some casinos take extra time and don't process and in addition they study the game history extremely closely to see if there is anything they can pull out of the T&C magic hat

I can partially understand payout limits, for a new casino it is essential for survival. It makes the costs more manageable, but there are normal limits and there are underground ones. For quite good I find 10,000 € daily, I can understand that somewhere. But what I can not understand is 2500 € per week for such a thing I have no understanding. Also for casinos that put fees on withdrawals no understanding at all, unless you can withdraw at least 1x daily for free. But e.g. with Vera John at least 50 € pay out or 5 € fee, with Energy Casino only one withdrawal per week without fee, ... why? So exaggerated regulations are not needed in the online business, especially these are not new casinos. They are established in the market and still continue to do so.

Getting back to the money and value thing, we live in an economic system where you can only survive if others have debt. Someone has to suffer so that we can live the current life, that is the truth behind the "social" market economy in Europe.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
In any case, I am aware that the comparison is not optimal. However, this behavior of the casinos indicates that they do not have the money they have to pay out. Therefore, in my opinion, the stalling tactic "hope that the player gambles away the money".
At the latest, if all players would withdraw their funds from their player accounts at the same time, most Online Casinos would certainly be insolvent. So just like our banking system where trading is based on trust
Please don't mind the lower and upper case. My iPhone correction does not quite keep up

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
capriz wrote on 20.01.2019 at 22:02: I am definitely aware that the comparison is not optimal. However, this behavior of the casinos indicates that they do not have the money they have to pay out. Therefore, in my opinion, the stalling tactic "hope that the player gambles away the money".
At the latest, if all players would withdraw their funds from their player accounts at the same time, most Online Casinos would certainly be insolvent. So just like our banking system where trading is based on trust
Please don't mind the lower and upper case. My iPhone correction does not quite keep up

So I agree with you more, is not the extent as with banks but I understand what is meant to be said.

This post has been translated automatically

Horsepower44
Top Member
qtek2911 wrote on 01/19/2019 8:36 pm: Have 2 extreme negative experiences

Royal Vegas Casino from 200 DM (2005) >29000 and the same night back to 0 after spinning 180 DM spins.

Pokerstars January 2016
In a 100000 shoutout Tournament for casino players only 10 players were qualified and each won 10000$, so up to 40000$ and burned those with reel rush to 5000$.

in 2005 you still gambled with D-Mark?

This post has been translated automatically

Strolch
Rookie
If you read here, the problem is not the gambling itself, you win often enough, even higher wins. The problem is greed.
If you make your 200+ from a standard 50€ Deposit (this is really no exception), then you must not think, now I make 1000€ out of it first and then pay out.

Let outcashen and makes just limits purely where you play. If you auscasht you are in the best case blocked at the same casino (regarding Wiedereinzalung) and otherwise you have taken the money out of a casino, where you would have gambled it away again anyway, and it must first be reinstated elsewhere (where hopefully also a limit is and you the damit wiederrum limited).

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Is but bullshit. I'm hardly greedy and am also happy about 50 € from a 20 deposit. The problem with me is that I come for 2 months not even 1 € over the deposit^^

This post has been translated automatically

Horsepower44
Top Member
redpikxchu wrote on 23/01/2019 at 10:12 am: Is but bullshit. I am hardly greedy and am also happy about 50 € from a 20 deposit. The problem with me is that I come for 2 months not even 1 € over the deposit^^

Have won yesterday from the VS free games 18.70 €. Just wanted to make the Zwanni full. Approx. 2 hours rumgeeiert, then the money was all. Is somehow standard at Videoslots. Have there but so far always only ten deposited, that just does not bringts

This post has been translated automatically

Strolch
Rookie

redpikxchu wrote on 23/01/2019 at 10:12 am: Is but bullshit. I am hardly greedy and am also happy about 50 € from a 20 deposit. The problem with me is that I come for 2 months not even 1 € over the deposit^^

That's a shame, but here in the thread it's about big wins that were gambled down again.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I just wanted to give a counterexample to your statement.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
800€ in lighting roulette...

Scheis flash never wanted as I wanted.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 12:05 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately