[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
17th Oct. 2020, at 10:54 am CEST#254
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Klabisto wrote on 16.10.2020 at 12:56 pm
From the casino probably not.
But what about bank and credit card deposits?
This option is still possible that it can affect all payment service providers if, as it has written the LG Ulm the ban is also considered as individual protection before the OLG and is confirmed by the BGH
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
19th Oct. 2020, at 02:40 pm CEST#256
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
What does it all mean now?
That Online Casinos based in Malta are or will be banned?
And also ewallets like Neteller and Skrill are abolished or that you can transfer to Malta casinos nothing more?
This post has been translated automatically
u****n
Forum posts:1.196Member has been banned
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
19th Oct. 2020, at 02:56 pm CEST#257
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
ChillEffect wrote on 10/19/2020 at 2:40 pm: What does it all mean now?
That Online Casinos based in Malta are or will be banned?
And also ewallets like Neteller and Skrill are abolished or that you can transfer to Malta casinos nix more?
Online casinos from Malta have always been banned in Germany, which is why you can get back the money gambled. Is nothing new. But the OCs from Malta are now tolerated since the 15th, as long as they adhere to the new guidelines. Has nothing at all to do with skrill and neteller.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
19th Oct. 2020, at 04:45 pm CEST#258
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
unicorn wrote on 19.10.2020 at 14:56
Online casinos from Malta have always been banned in D., which is why you can get your gambled money back. Is all nothing new. But the OCs from Malta are now tolerated since the 15th as long as they adhere to the new guidelines. Has nothing at all to do with Skrill and neteller.
In the ruling, it is only about chargeback. The court had an easy game in the case. If ever a case arises where a customer has deposited via Trustly or Sofort and the casino is forced to refund, you have convinced me. Somewhere I once picked up that the right to refund is valid for 3 years. Since then could come together quite a bit for us
In the judgment, it is also not dealt with whether the plaintiff has made a win in advance. This would have to be calculated against it. I also do not believe that the plaintiff has refrained from gambling afterwards, which does not make my opinion of him any better
The whole judgment is another declaration of bankruptcy of our constitutional state
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
20th Oct. 2020, at 10:38 am CEST#259
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Jokerboy wrote on 10/19/2020 at 4:45 pm
In the ruling, it also does not address whether the plaintiff made a win up front. This would have to be counted against it. I also don't believe that the plaintiff refrained from gambling afterwards, which doesn't make my opinion of this one any better
The whole judgment is another declaration of bankruptcy of our constitutional state.
It must also not because the deposits were certainly offset against the payouts, if they were available at all!
What you ultimately believe does not matter
The only bankruptcy is that the Executive has allowed this since 2012 and since 15.10. also still rewards these illegal OC!
Find it eh totally asi addicted to gambling and then get the coal again 😂 hope there is no cent again from mistakes should learn and then make the best of it ...😅
"Just recently, the federal states decided to tolerate online casinos. According to information from NDR and SZ, the public prosecutor's office in Frankfurt is nevertheless investigating several providers of such gambling." ... ......
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
This option is still possible that it can affect all payment service providers if, as it has written the LG Ulm the ban is also considered as individual protection before the OLG and is confirmed by the BGH
Everything but also nothing is possible...
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
That Online Casinos based in Malta are or will be banned?
And also ewallets like Neteller and Skrill are abolished or that you can transfer to Malta casinos nothing more?
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Liked this post: Anonym
Online casinos from Malta have always been banned in Germany, which is why you can get back the money gambled. Is nothing new. But the OCs from Malta are now tolerated since the 15th, as long as they adhere to the new guidelines. Has nothing at all to do with skrill and neteller.
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
In the ruling, it is only about chargeback. The court had an easy game in the case. If ever a case arises where a customer has deposited via Trustly or Sofort and the casino is forced to refund, you have convinced me. Somewhere I once picked up that the right to refund is valid for 3 years. Since then could come together quite a bit for us
In the judgment, it is also not dealt with whether the plaintiff has made a win in advance. This would have to be calculated against it. I also do not believe that the plaintiff has refrained from gambling afterwards, which does not make my opinion of him any better
The whole judgment is another declaration of bankruptcy of our constitutional state
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
It must also not because the deposits were certainly offset against the payouts, if they were available at all!
What you ultimately believe does not matter
The only bankruptcy is that the Executive has allowed this since 2012 and since 15.10. also still rewards these illegal OC!
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Liked this post:
sippi
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player
Nobody has liked this post so far
"Just recently, the federal states decided to tolerate online casinos. According to information from NDR and SZ, the public prosecutor's office in Frankfurt is nevertheless investigating several providers of such gambling." ... ......
This post has been translated automatically