Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Casinos where you should not play under any circumstances (loss is not a reason!) (Page 72)

Topic created on 16th Dec. 2021 | Page: 72 of 74 | Answers: 731 | Views: 206,919
gamble1
Legend

Iknowyou wrote on 02/29/2024 21:19:

Annoyed to have received money? If you receive a payout, that's good and not a scam

No, not having received money meant that when the money arrived at the end it was at most a bit annoying because of the delay but no reason to discourage playing there

This post has been translated automatically

Paddington
Top Member

gamble1 wrote on 01.03.2024 02:20:

No not having received money meant that when the money arrived at the end it was at most a bit annoying because of the delay but no reason to discourage playing there

Guys what's wrong with you?

With so many casinos to choose from, why should you play there? I mean it took 14 days until it said "Please verify". I was in the Live Chat again and again and spoke to all kinds of employees, all of them incompetent. The casino is deliberately stalling players in the hope that they can avoid paying out. Compared to what else is available on the market, it is simply filthy and for me is clearly one of the casinos where you shouldn't play. Win a few thousand euros there. Have fun paying out! 500€ limit per transaction is then added on top of that!

This post has been translated automatically

Eckbert
Amateur
Hello, if you know Wild Pharaoh, Scatterhall and Spinpirate you should also stay away from Vikingspins. It's the same site layout, no Live Chat and nobody answers. I'm 100% sure it's the same people as Wild Pharao. On Trustpilot you can only read negative things about Vikingspins. If you are smart, don't deposit.

This post has been translated automatically

Paddington
Top Member

Eckbert wrote on 01.03.2024 at 21:51: Hello, if you know Wild Pharaoh, Scatterhall and Spinpirate you should also stay away from Vikingspins. It's the same site layout, no Live Chat and nobody answers. I'm 100% sure it's the same people as Wild Pharao. On Trustpilot you can only read negative things about Vikingspins. If you are smart, don't deposit.

Very good advice! Thank you!

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Paddington wrote on 01.03.2024 08:08:

Guys what is wrong with you?

With so many casinos to choose from, why would you play there? I mean it took 14 days until it said "Please verify". I was in the Live Chat again and again and spoke to all kinds of employees, all of them incompetent. The casino is deliberately stalling players in the hope that they can avoid paying out. Compared to what else is available on the market, it is simply filthy and for me is clearly one of the casinos where you shouldn't play. Win a few thousand euros there. Have fun paying out! 500€ limit per transaction is then added on top of that!

Yes, but I thought we had limited ourselves here to casinos where either fake slots have a fake license or don't pay out at all

Just being a stupid casino where it takes 30 days to pay out is not enough, it used to be normal even at Curacao casinos before such breakers like Stakes etc...

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

gamble1 wrote on 02.03.2024 at 13:07:
Yes but I thought we were limited here to casinos where either fake slots fake license or do not pay out at all

Just being a stupid casino where it takes 30 days to pay out is not enough, it used to be normal even at Curacao casinos before such breakers as Stakes etc...

It should be that way, but Gj doesn't care if there are already pages of off tobic conversations going on.

This post has been translated automatically

Playmaus
Amateur

Paddington wrote on 02.03.2024 08:31:

Very good point! Thank you!

Oh good to know

This post has been translated automatically

Max_Bet
Expert

DIE-SPIELBANK_en wrote on 02/21/2024 16:57:

From our point of view, it's a bit like real life:
Some rules are annoying, but they're there to protect as many as possible, even if it doesn't seem that way sometimes.

It's such a sick lie. As if one of these new German rules is a preventative measure against gambling addiction. That's just plain hypocritical.

You should actually be two companies in one. One makes people sick and addicted with its legal advertising and all the bullshit that goes with it and the other company pretends that it wants to cure people of this shit. Then you can even cash in twice.
Such hypocritical shit go away ey 🤐

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Max_Bet wrote on 13.03.2024 at 20:02:

This is so sick lying. As if one of these new German rules will prevent gambling addiction. That's just hypocritical.

You should actually be two companies in one. One makes people sick and addicted with its legal advertising and all the bullshit that goes with it and the other company pretends that it wants to cure people of this shit. Then you can even cash in twice.
Such hypocritical shit go away ey 🤐

And that's exactly what I mean by providers who are not customer-oriented! They simply lie to the customer's face to make themselves feel better about the shit they're tied to


Everyone will know how nonsensical the DE rules are because otherwise this would inevitably mean that in every country with normal serious regulations there would be even more gambling addicts, which is certainly not the case in practice, on the contrary, too strong limitations tend to encourage a migration to areas where not even a simple account block works

And another point that I appreciate about StarGames! You get an answer like "We don't like the changes either, but as a regulated Provider we are obliged to comply with them" or something like that

You can tell immediately that it's an honest company

My gosh, now they're all starting to talk about the biggest shit like the whole media is already doing just to be politically correct, otherwise you could assume a right-wing attitude if you look at things soberly and question things that may not be solved so well

We are all free people who can think and just because you are licensed by the state you can also communicate grievances clearly with your customers

And by totally stupid I don't mean something like Oasis because this is the only sensible consequence of the State Treaty on Gambling, but I do mean the regulation with the €1 per spin or the 5 second rule when the maximum depositor per month is already limited and I also mean the outrageous taxation and the resulting poor RTP of the games the resulting poor RTP of the slots and of course the biggest scandal that you can gamble away your house in the casino in one night and only Oasis is available there and no further prevention against Gambling addiction is carried out and the only justification is because you can always gamble online around the clock

And pretending to be the savior of people from gambling addiction with such things is not only a slap in the face for every gambling addict who has slipped into addiction through this ridiculous double standard, but almost borders on deliberate fraud and discrimination because it doesn't seem to be as uniform as this system is praised if online private and offline private and offline state rules are valid in each case

This post has been translated automatically

Max_Bet
Expert

gamble1 wrote on 14.03.2024 at 07:18:

And that's exactly what I mean by providers who are not customer-oriented! They simply lie to the customer's face to make themselves feel better with the shit they are bound to


Everyone will know how nonsensical the DE rules are because otherwise this would inevitably mean that in any country with normal, serious regulations there would be even more gambling addicts, which is certainly not the case in practice - on the contrary, excessive limits are more likely to encourage migration to areas where not even a simple account ban would work

And another point that I appreciate about StarGames! You get an answer like "We don't like the changes either, but as a regulated Provider we are obliged to comply with them" or something like that

You can tell immediately that it's an honest company

My gosh, now they're all starting to talk about the biggest shit like the whole media is already doing just to be politically correct, otherwise you could assume a right-wing attitude if you look at things soberly and question things that may not be solved so well

We are all free people who can think and just because you are licensed by the state you can also communicate grievances clearly with your customers

And by totally stupid I don't mean something like Oasis because this is the only sensible consequence of the State Treaty on Gambling, but I do mean the regulation with the €1 per spin or the 5 second rule when the maximum depositor per month is already limited and I also mean the outrageous taxation and the resulting poor RTP of the games the resulting poor RTP of the slots and of course the biggest scandal that you can gamble away your house in the casino in one night and only Oasis is available there and no further prevention against Gambling addiction is carried out and the only justification is because you can always gamble online around the clock

And pretending to be the savior of people from gambling addiction with such things is not only a slap in the face for every gambling addict who has slipped into addiction through this ridiculous double standard but almost borders on deliberate fraud and discrimination because it does not seem to be as uniform as this system is praised if online private and offline private and offline state rules are valid in each case

In a nutshell 🤝🏻

Where should I sign? 😉

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics15th Apr. 2024 at 11:43 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately