Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible? (Page 12)

Topic created on 04th Jan. 2019 | Page: 12 of 39 | Answers: 388 | Views: 98,594
9****f
I wouldn't have a bad conscience either. The casinos are no better with their terms and conditions and unaccepted documents. They act on a whim, knowing that nothing can happen to you in Malta.

Now a way has been found, and that is then morally reprehensible? I do not see so!
I see rather an equality of arms!

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite

Royal777 wrote on 04/02/2019 at 17:59: If you book the money back via PayPal, then the casino is happy. Because they will get their money. PayPal is liable for the customer. With such an action you only harm PayPal.
Probably the casinos are happy that PayPal gives the player his money back. It ends up back in the casino anyway

you do not harm paypal but only yourself, if paypal has to get money from you is very quickly a seizure of your bank account the consequence

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
Seizure? Why?

PayPal can not simply seize if they themselves have committed a crime.
This is really cheese
So you could inform yourself a bit.
With such a half-knowledge or no knowledge is really dangerous.
A seizure is only possible, if it is NOT through an illegal
Illegal activity. And then only in connection with a
Report. Since PayPal has played the game itself, and has made itself punishable
made itself punishable, it holds of course
the feet still! Or why do you think, waive the umpteen Foderungen?

Ausserem it does not matter who you harm, if the money is back!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
9c-3f wrote on February 07, 2019 at 7:58 pm: Garnishment? Why?

PayPal can't just garnish if they've committed a crime themselves.
This is really cheese now
So a little bit of information you could already.
With such a half-knowledge or no knowledge is really dangerous.
A seizure is only possible, if it is NOT through an illegal
Illegal activity. And then only in connection with a
Report. Since PayPal has played the game itself, and has made itself punishable
made itself punishable, it holds of course
the feet still! Or why do you think, waive the umpteen Foderungen?

Ausserem it does not matter who you harm, if the money is back!

The waive but only after they have made pressure and that is not to be underestimated. I think the straight older there not rarely give small with, if they have no support.

The support of Paypal is also very poorly trained on the subject. Ask whether online gambling is allowed in casinos, I used to get different answers. How it is now after withdrawal I do not know.

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite
9c-3f wrote on February 07, 2019 at 7:58 pm: Garnishment? Why?

PayPal can't just garnish if they've committed a crime themselves.
This is really cheese now
So a little bit of information you could already.
With such a half-knowledge or no knowledge is really dangerous.
A seizure is possible only if it is NOT by an illegal
Illegal activity. And then only in connection with a
Report. Since PayPal has played the game itself, and has made itself punishable
made itself punishable, it holds of course
the feet still! Or why do you think, waive the umpteen Foderungen?

Ausserem it does not matter who you harm, if the money is back!

You smarty pants I was seized the account because I have booked back at the ELV

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
Yes, of course. That they don't give up their money without a murmur....
If that makes the rounds, everyone does that.
So is threatened with Debt collection, court, garnishment, etc., but ultimately nothing
of it converted, because it has no prospect of success. Otherwise
PayPal would have sued long ago

Ancient scam, with the threat scam work all companies, no matter in which area
in which area.

And the withdrawal says it all. They voluntarily give up millions. So the
the Risk of chargebacks should not be underestimated, and it is also legally
legally compliant, as long as no intent can be assumed.

It only works once. Whereas, as long as no one from the Finazdienstleistern
or casinos, you can play the game for a long time
The intent can only be determined by a court, and so far I am not aware of any lawsuit
Lawsuit known.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Dbac79 wrote on 02/07/2019 at 8:23 pm
You smarty pants I was seized the account because I have charged back at the ELV

But then you probably only charged back and not otherwise.

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
Dbac79 wrote on 02/07/2019 at 8:23 pm
You smart ass I was seized the account because I have charged back at the ELV

This is a very normal direct debit, that is

something completely different.

Who has seized?
If you have charged back, your own bank will have to bear the costs
will be stuck with the costs. And they are in Germany, and you are the customer.
They have completely different possibilities, it is logical!


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Something else to add:

Couldn't PayPal charge those who do chargeback with illegal gambling?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Zockertyp89 wrote on 02/07/2019 at 20:54: Something different about this for a change:

Couldn't PayPal charge those who do chargeback for illegal gambling?

That's exactly what I've been wondering....I honestly don't think it's out of the question...But not only them, also the banks...

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics3rd May. 2024 at 07:34 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately