ruhrpott wrote on 06/09/2018 at 18:10: I honestly don't understand at all why diebezüglich ne discussion was started. You did not, bitter as it is, Deposit from your own account. Rizk prohibits this. You got your deposits back and that's it.
I also think in general, independent of you, something like this has no place here from my point of view, because the casino has done nothing wrong. If you start now and every time such a thread opens, without an error is present and you only hope for ne possible goodwill payment of the casino, then cheers meal, then you soon have 100 new threads, daily....
Do not get me wrong, it's annoying because of the sum somewhere already, but also your own mistake.
Can not understand your statement, the casino allows you to deposit nice and good much from wherever! BUT when it comes to pay out that is somehow not right. If you look at it the other way around I can go to e.g. my brother's account to deposit and if I have then lost everything to the casino say "hey give me the coal back" in your terms and conditions I may not deposit with other account.
But on the subject, actually I found Rizk always one of my top 3 casinos but since I would have liked a positive end too pity.
And on the subject of getting money back via PayPal, I would leave that if your credit rating is important to you!
qwertee wrote on 07.09.2018 at 01:19
Can not understand your statement, the casino allows you to Deposit nice and good much from wherever! BUT when it comes to pay out that is somehow not legal. If you look at it the other way around I can go to deposit over eg my brother's account and if I have then lost everything to the casino say "hey give me the coal back" in your terms and conditions I may not deposit with other account.
But on the subject, actually I found Rizk always one of my top 3 casinos but there I would have liked a positive end too pity.
And on the subject of getting money back via PayPal, I would leave that if your credit rating is important to you!
I would now simply times claim thats with deposits simply not immediately noticeable. Since all withdrawals are checked very carefully, I can imagine that this is actually only noticed there. Of course, it would be better and fairer if this is noticed directly during the deposit, but this still does not change the fact that in such cases you simply do not need to complain if you do not receive the money. The error, regardless of when it is noticed still lies with the player, at least in my eyes. You just have to read the terms and conditions
To your example: Well, so simple is 's then but rather not, because one could then yes intent impute to the player (from my point of view even justified), because then there would be no Risk at all for the player. You pay in, if you lose you get your money back, and if you win you hope that the casino doesn't notice.... That can't be the right way.
I would now simply claim that this is simply not immediately noticeable with deposits. Since all withdrawals are checked very carefully, I can imagine that this is actually only noticed there. Of course, it would be better and fairer if this is noticed directly during the Deposit, but this still does not change the fact that in such cases you simply do not need to complain if you do not receive the money. The error, regardless of when it is noticed still lies with the player, at least in my eyes. You just have to read the terms and conditions
To your example: Well, so simple is 's then but rather not, because one could then yes intent impute to the player (from my point of view even justified), because then there would be no Risk at all for the player. You pay in, if you lose you get your money back, and if you win you hope that the casino doesn't notice.... That can't be the right way.
If the casino deliberately lets me deposit from another account, that's just as intentional. This should not be possible from the outset, just like the 5€ Bet rule here is already speculated by the casino. "If he wins, we keep the win, but he may lose first as much as it goes" Most of the time you do not necessarily pay out after the first payout.
To my example: Apparently it is so simple, or do you give the casino more rights than yourself?
Short update the casino has paid me the amount and it should be in 5werktagen on my account so the case can be closed thank you the casino also again for the justice
So I have now a month every day inquired also the MGA switched on. And then they sent me a document where my father had to confirm that I may use the PayPal account and then after six days they wrote after careful examination they may continue to play here and the amount is paid out. I have had it today on the account
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
18th Sep. 2018, at 11:53 am CEST#59
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Isisam wrote on 18.09.2018 at 11:48: So I have now a month every day inquired also the MGA switched on. And then they sent me a document where my father had to confirm that I am allowed to use the PayPal account and then after six days they wrote after careful review you are allowed to continue playing here and the amount is paid out. I have had it today on the account.
Do I see that correctly, you got your deposits back and the win now too? So they have given you the money virtually?
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
i have already presented my case under another thread.
If such problems as payout denied, rejected for even so ridiculous reason. Then just book the money back.
With me it worked wonderfully via PayPal!!!
Only one woch I already got mail. Where the case has been discontinued as a gesture of goodwill.
My motto: Act! Instead of complaining! Don't take any shit from them!!!!!!
They don't want to pay out??? All the better if you have already gambled away a larger sum. Paypal is judicially seen on very thin ice!!!!!!
VG
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Liked this post:
Isisam
Can not understand your statement, the casino allows you to deposit nice and good much from wherever! BUT when it comes to pay out that is somehow not right. If you look at it the other way around I can go to e.g. my brother's account to deposit and if I have then lost everything to the casino say "hey give me the coal back" in your terms and conditions I may not deposit with other account.
But on the subject, actually I found Rizk always one of my top 3 casinos but since I would have liked a positive end too pity.
And on the subject of getting money back via PayPal, I would leave that if your credit rating is important to you!
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
I would now simply times claim thats with deposits simply not immediately noticeable. Since all withdrawals are checked very carefully, I can imagine that this is actually only noticed there. Of course, it would be better and fairer if this is noticed directly during the deposit, but this still does not change the fact that in such cases you simply do not need to complain if you do not receive the money. The error, regardless of when it is noticed still lies with the player, at least in my eyes. You just have to read the terms and conditions
To your example: Well, so simple is 's then but rather not, because one could then yes intent impute to the player (from my point of view even justified), because then there would be no Risk at all for the player. You pay in, if you lose you get your money back, and if you win you hope that the casino doesn't notice.... That can't be the right way.
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Liked this post: Anonym,
Isisam
If the casino deliberately lets me deposit from another account, that's just as intentional. This should not be possible from the outset, just like the 5€ Bet rule here is already speculated by the casino. "If he wins, we keep the win, but he may lose first as much as it goes" Most of the time you do not necessarily pay out after the first payout.
To my example: Apparently it is so simple, or do you give the casino more rights than yourself?
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do I see that correctly, you got your deposits back and the win now too? So they have given you the money virtually?
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk refuses to pay out €3275.00
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically