Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Videoslots: Complaint about the ridiculous player protection and highroller bonuses. (Page 4)

Topic created on 03rd Jul. 2019 | Page: 4 of 5 | Answers: 47 | Views: 8,772
b****6
Provided it is true:

That he gambled away 100,000 euros in one week, his own fault, no question at all.
His problem with the bonus is also complete nonsense. With 100.000€ gambled away
Money I have a completely different problem.

What is rather a problem that with a Deposit of 20 euros, and
a subsequent win of, for example, 5000€ everything possible is required.
And woe, it is missing a corner of the ID, or it is not original what
the casino has demanded. With 20€ deposit he can not make a big
Money laundering. Even if he deposits in all casinos that currently exist.
You can never prevent it completely anyway. The 5000€ comes from the casino.
The casinos tell on inquiries that the strict money laundering laws are to blame for it
are to blame. If you take it exactly, I would have to get a certificate from the casino,
where they get the 5000€ to pay my win. After all, I don't want to
not to be involved in criminal acts.

But if someone deposits 100,000€, all of a sudden this is no longer a problem.
Nothing is checked, and the money laundering protection so highly important by the casinos
suddenly quite indifferent. And that actually shows the mendacity of this industry.

Because of 20€ the world crazy make, but 100,000€ simply times in-cash.
Double standards at their finest.

This post has been translated automatically

G****e
I find already that the bank also with "debt" (if one wants to speak of debt) has. If what comes in from the OC se also want to know where that comes from, etc.. And if someone, who is probably not a millionaire according to TE, 100k in 2 weeks by immediately and Trustly somewhere abroad transfers should be made but already at 20-30k a stop and ask whether that has its correctness. If the police stops you on the street and you have 100k EUR with you, they will also ask where it came from etc.. I know such a loss of control, although not 100k but were also good 10k I have buttered 2 years ago in a week. Was also thinking about whether I should ask the bank if that is reversible. Did not do it and since then is only deposited with Paysafecard. For me, the loss was good and I'm no longer so'n "Highroller" as at the time

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
There are certainly many professional athletes, big earners, etc. who like to play in Online Casinos and for them 100 000 euros are peanuts. Therefore, the TE should not believe that he was the great exception here the such sums in a short time verdaddelt. The casino did not even notice, because there are certainly many more of these high-roller players.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
At Leo Vegas I always get a no Deposit bonus credited afterwards. Mostly 10% of the deposited amount. I just have to write to the support and then I get a No Deposit Bonus without deposit what I have to convert 1 x


This is really stingy from Videoslots...so you do not treat highroller customers

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend

--> my post was meant more ironically, not understood? does not matter, it's clear that no one plays because of Jackpot wheels, not normally

others have already said it more clearly.

player protection
in principle vs has done everything right
vs also has a lot of customers with more than 100,000
you are a new customer for them, pay actively several times over 2 weeks high sums and are also blocked at some point as a precaution.

at the latest you have not heard the shot, leveraging even the lock with supposedly good argumentation against the Live Chat because it is your responsibility whether you play or not.
no matter how, in my opinion you can't talk your way out of this on --> searches.
this is simply a stupid behavior towards yourself.

you are only annoyed by the too few Bonuses at the sum (as you write yourself)
from this one can only conclude that it is probably rather a liberating blow for you that your money is now gone, not even dismay or be upset in your posts. but since apart from your posts no one here knows your circumstances can not say more

cashback
as a supposed highroller i would ask a new oc before registration what Cashback programs are available.

if you take it exactly, the jackpot wheels, the weekend booster and the strange clash of spins are the current cashback at vs


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
capriz wrote on 04/07/2019 at 15:16: At Leo Vegas I always get a no Deposit bonus credited afterwards. Mostly 10% of the deposited amount. I only have to write to the support and then I get a No Deposit Bonus without deposit what I have to convert 1 x


This is really stingy from Videoslots...this is not how you treat highroller customers

That's what I mean. When I played at Rizk I got very good and also many bonuses.
To get back to my original question: would you have any chance of success if you complain to the mga or UK commission ?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
What are you going to complain about, that you were too weak to stop your lust for gaming or that they didn't give you cool Bonuses? Both will only lead to big laughter. A word of advice: don't do it.

Snort your nose, life goes on.

This post has been translated automatically

Punraz
Rookie
Julian wrote on 04/07/2019 at 13:07
Correct there are different commission models, but we have deliberately chosen the one-time commission model in the past.
Daniel had also commented on this several times in the past.

In the end, we want to be as independent as possible from the casinos, that is, if a casino should mess up then we can act without restriction without having to fear that it would bear financial consequences for us.

Also, the model with the percentage stakes is not quite as Risk-free as some might think, of course, in this case now, for example, where someone gambles 100,000 € would get a good piece of the pie
But what would happen if the mentioned user or another highroller would make a payout of 250.000€? That would mean for us that we could get fat in the minus and would not receive any income for a whole month, so to speak, and since we now also have employees for whom we are responsible, that is simply too risky for us.

I didn't know that Daniel only earns money through CPA. But that's right, GambleJoe is more independent in his decisions

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Julian wrote on 04/07/2019 at 13:07
Correct there are different commission models, but we have deliberately chosen the one-time commission model in the past.
Daniel had also commented on this several times in the past.

In the end, we want to be as independent as possible from the casinos, that is, if a casino should mess up then we can act without restriction without having to fear that it would bear financial consequences for us.

Also, the model with the percentage stakes is not quite as Risk-free as some might think, of course, in this case now, for example, where someone gambles 100,000 € would get a good piece of the pie
But what would happen if the mentioned user or another highroller would make a payout of 250.000€? That would mean for us that we could get fat in the minus and would not receive any income for a whole month, so to speak, and since we now also have employees for whom we are responsible, that is simply too risky for us.

do you mean that if eg someone would win 250k and such a system would exist from this casino then nothing is paid for other sales until the 250k are back in there quasi the player came from you and because of you the casino makes 250k minus?


because the other possibility would be yes otherwise only the partners would bear the risk if someone wins and suddenly a bill flutters purely and I think that is unlikely

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
gamble1 wrote on 07/04/2019 5:23 PM

do you mean that if eg someone would win 250k and such a said system would exist from this casino then nothing is paid for other sales until the 250k are back in since quasi the player came from you and because of you the casino makes 250k minus ?


because the other possibility would be otherwise only the partners would bear the Risk with if someone wins and suddenly a bill flutters purely and I think that is unlikely

Yes an Affilliate account can actually end up in the negative, here the partner must of course not pay the outstanding sum or the like, but should it come down to it for example that an Affilliate would recruit two players and one of them would let me pay out 250k, then that would be listed in the commission report and if the other recruited player does not balance the account, it will run on the fact that the Affilliate also receives no money for the other recruited players in this month.

The following month, of course, almost all providers reset everything back to zero and the game starts all over again, so it is in a way also gambling with the commission model

But there are even casinos that punish the Affiliate in the long run by having "negative carryover".
I.e. the loss incurred by the casino is also credited to the affiliate in all subsequent months, so it can even happen that you are in the red as an affiliate for several months

Apart from that, everything can also look smooth for the affiliate until the end of the month and then on the last day someone wins a Jackpot or something similar and suddenly you are left without anything at the end.

Therefore, this is not a solution for us in the long run

Sorry for the off-topic
@gamble1 If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me via Communicator.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics15th May. 2024 at 10:11 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately