Just for the record. I know the turnover limit on 5€ very well and have also not turned a higher bet, but as I said I know from other casinos that it does not count to convert the Risk function, but not that is considered as a reason to set the wins to 0
But well I had probably at all other casinos then just lucky 😄
What I want to say, I have read through it and still violated and I'm sure I'm not the first who thinks it's the maximum bet only about the bet per game round....
Zockerfreak94 wrote on 19/12/2019 00:53: Because it might not happen to other players then ?
And sorry but for me this is very much a scam, see the example with spielothek.
Also, it would not be a scam then you could also lock as long as you play with the bonus eg higher stakes and Risk, but well if you think it's fair the way they operate then that's just your opinion 😄
Wait but in a Spielo you get yes no money to play for free !
You can also use the risk function online but only without bonus at the most so only with your money
You play in this moment not only your money but also money that is given by the casino as an addition then that is just attached to conditions
Zockerfreak94 wrote on 19.12.2019 at 01:07 clock: Just for the record. I know the turnover limit on 5€ very well and have also not turned a higher bet, but as I said I know from other casinos that it does not count to convert the Risk function, but not that is considered as a reason to set the wins to 0
But well I had probably at all other casinos then just lucky 😄
What I want to say, I have read through it and still violated and I'm sure I'm not the first who thinks it's the maximum bet only about the bet per game round....
you must use only times in nem casino the risk function, and then go times on game progress. e.g. you turn on 1€, win 10€. now you use the risk function. If you then look in the game history, there is then a spin with 10€ inside Believe me, this is really forbidden in most casinos. In some it is also better in the Bonus terms and conditions inside than at templenile. Be glad that it happened to you so late, and you were often lucky before. Next time just ask the support if this is allowed. (IMPORTANT, if they say yes, it is allowed, send you the chat history or make screenshots of the chat history, so you are on the safe side)
Zockerfreak94 wrote on 19/12/2019 00:53: Because it might not happen to other players then ?
And sorry but for me this is very much a scam, see the example with spielothek.
Also, it would not be a scam then you could also as long as you play with the bonus e.g. Higher stakes and Risk lock, but well if you think it's fair the way they operate then that's just your opinion 😄
First of all with known big players? Who exactly are you referring to? VS is relatively tolerant if you so not exactly a good share of the bonus wagering and you are a good Einahle, Rizk is the exact opposite.
The 5€ max. bet rule incl. prohibition of the risk function is now not quite such a new invention - you can thank the Bonushuntern of the past 😜.
I also think that you can not talk about a scam and certainly not about fraudulent misrepresentation, because the rule is actually quite clearly defined in the terms and conditions and bonus conditions.
Rules are rules, if the defender takes the ball in the penalty area in the hand, it is also not less a penalty just because this finds the rule stupid.
On the subject of blocking: for what reason should the OC do this and for EVERY slot? It's not like there are only 5 guys in an OC and the effort would be guaranteed not so small. After all, new ones come out every month, new sub-versions have to be checked again and what happens if you forget to block one? I guarantee you, if an OC would come so far to meet the player and there is one overlooked, is of course again this fault.
Twin btw. has such a lock, how well it works you can try it yourself on occasion 😉
Seniorfips wrote on 19.12.2019 at 01:15
you have to use only times in nem casino the Risk function, and then go times on game history. e.g. you turn on 1€, win 10€. now you use the risk function. If you then look in the game history, there is then a spin with 10€ inside Believe me, this is really forbidden in most casinos. In some it is also better in the Bonus terms and conditions inside than at templenile. Be glad that it happened to you so late, and you were often lucky before. Next time just ask the support if this is allowed. (IMPORTANT, if they say yes, it is allowed, have them send you the chat history or take screenshots of the chat history, so you are on the safe side)
You are never on the safe side, even with chat history.
Yes, I have to live with now. Have it just not understood, because even if many will probably not believe it, it is the first time in 2 years and that is as I said determined 10 casinos
Ultimately, I can only say that it is still a no go casino for me, alone because they see that it is a "provided" and I have not turned higher in the game. Here I would let apply as a company goodwill.
I remember one of my first wins back then at EnergyCasino since I really violated it on 10 € turned throughout and when I paid out came a mail that I violated the terms and conditions and have warned me one last time and still have paid out then 3 times namely 3000 €.
Kleinkariert wrote on 12/19/2019 at 01:21 AM
You are never on the safe side, even with chat protocol.
100% but often enough had so himself. Especially with larger sums it is important that the support gives correct information. If he does not, the casino must stand for it and not me.
Seniorfips wrote at 01:25 on Dec 19, 2019
100% but often enough had so himself. Especially with larger sums it is important that the support gives correct information. If he does not, the casino must stand for it and not me
But I also think, with such obvious things it is difficult even with protocol. After all, you accept the conditions at registration and not only after consultation with the support.
It looks different if, for example, the wagering is not displayed transparently, you ask the support if it is through he wrongly affirms and you then turn to 5+€.
MarcT22186 wrote on 12/19/2019 at 01:35 PM
But I think also, with such obvious things it becomes difficult even with protocol. After all, one accepts the terms and conditions yes at registration and not only after consultation with support.
It probably looks different if, for example, the wagering is not displayed transparently, you ask the support if it is through he wrongly affirms and you then turn to 5+€.
believe me, the support gives the wrong answer, the casino is to blame and not me. What else is this there for, except to give you the security in case of uncertainty? Thanks to screenshots, I have already been proven right in some impossible cases. The most curious case was with me once the following: In the e-mail headline said, pay X and get 2x 100€ free bets. In the e-mail itself was only 1x 100€ free bet with Deposit X. I pointed it out to the supporter. No idea what he understood, but gave me the 2x 100€ free bet without that I have deposited (has probably seen an old deposit as a new one) End of the song, 2.5k win through it, and thanks to screenshots get right that I have the supporter in no way fooled to get the 2x 100€ free bet
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
But well I had probably at all other casinos then just lucky 😄
What I want to say, I have read through it and still violated and I'm sure I'm not the first who thinks it's the maximum bet only about the bet per game round....
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wait but in a Spielo you get yes no money to play for free !
You can also use the risk function online but only without bonus at the most so only with your money
You play in this moment not only your money but also money that is given by the casino as an addition then that is just attached to conditions
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
you must use only times in nem casino the risk function, and then go times on game progress. e.g. you turn on 1€, win 10€. now you use the risk function. If you then look in the game history, there is then a spin with 10€ inside Believe me, this is really forbidden in most casinos. In some it is also better in the Bonus terms and conditions inside than at templenile. Be glad that it happened to you so late, and you were often lucky before. Next time just ask the support if this is allowed. (IMPORTANT, if they say yes, it is allowed, send you the chat history or make screenshots of the chat history, so you are on the safe side)
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
1) because this casino does not exclude the use of the Risk function
2) It is simply not noticed
3) The casino has turned a blind eye to the fact that another long-term speculation has taken place
They can ignore their rules you can not
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
First of all with known big players? Who exactly are you referring to? VS is relatively tolerant if you so not exactly a good share of the bonus wagering and you are a good Einahle, Rizk is the exact opposite.
The 5€ max. bet rule incl. prohibition of the risk function is now not quite such a new invention - you can thank the Bonushuntern of the past 😜.
I also think that you can not talk about a scam and certainly not about fraudulent misrepresentation, because the rule is actually quite clearly defined in the terms and conditions and bonus conditions.
Rules are rules, if the defender takes the ball in the penalty area in the hand, it is also not less a penalty just because this finds the rule stupid.
On the subject of blocking: for what reason should the OC do this and for EVERY slot? It's not like there are only 5 guys in an OC and the effort would be guaranteed not so small. After all, new ones come out every month, new sub-versions have to be checked again and what happens if you forget to block one? I guarantee you, if an OC would come so far to meet the player and there is one overlooked, is of course again this fault.
Twin btw. has such a lock, how well it works you can try it yourself on occasion 😉
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
You are never on the safe side, even with chat history.
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ultimately, I can only say that it is still a no go casino for me, alone because they see that it is a "provided" and I have not turned higher in the game. Here I would let apply as a company goodwill.
I remember one of my first wins back then at EnergyCasino since I really violated it on 10 € turned throughout and when I paid out came a mail that I violated the terms and conditions and have warned me one last time and still have paid out then 3 times namely 3000 €.
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
100% but often enough had so himself. Especially with larger sums it is important that the support gives correct information. If he does not, the casino must stand for it and not me.
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
But I also think, with such obvious things it is difficult even with protocol. After all, you accept the conditions at registration and not only after consultation with the support.
It looks different if, for example, the wagering is not displayed transparently, you ask the support if it is through he wrongly affirms and you then turn to 5+€.
This post has been translated automatically
Templenile refuses to pay out
Nobody has liked this post so far
believe me, the support gives the wrong answer, the casino is to blame and not me. What else is this there for, except to give you the security in case of uncertainty? Thanks to screenshots, I have already been proven right in some impossible cases. The most curious case was with me once the following: In the e-mail headline said, pay X and get 2x 100€ free bets. In the e-mail itself was only 1x 100€ free bet with Deposit X. I pointed it out to the supporter. No idea what he understood, but gave me the 2x 100€ free bet without that I have deposited (has probably seen an old deposit as a new one) End of the song, 2.5k win through it, and thanks to screenshots get right that I have the supporter in no way fooled to get the 2x 100€ free bet
This post has been translated automatically