Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

# Other Casinos #: [solved] NightRush - payout problem (Page 3)

Topic created on 17th Dec. 2019 | Page: 3 of 5 | Answers: 43 | Views: 7,093
darkic1987
Visitor
derzweifel wrote on 12/17/2019 at 16:58: Also find that this is not a clean practice on the part of the casino

At the same time, it is simply negligent of you to continue playing with such a win, to accept offers that suddenly bring a bonus into play and think nothing of it. The fact that there are bonus conditions to be met and that these are also relevant if you have only received a 3 euro bonus from freespins is nothing new. The casino will argue that by the bonus of freespins your entire balance became a bonus balance and then violated the Maxbet rule, with which all wins from Deposit (50€) can be retained.

I would file a complaint with the MGA in any case, but the chances are probably not particularly good


Hi,

Yes, it was certainly negligent. However, I was not aware of any guilt. I am surprised that there is no clear regulation regarding this MaxBet rule. What are the arguments of an online casino from such a regulation?

The argumentation is very interesting. Question is why they then distinguish between a bonus and real balance

I let myself talk all the conditions, but not on a balance that was already there at a high level without bonus.

Where is the difference to the balance if 7000 would have been deposited? they came along without a bonus.

From my point of view clear rip-off and it is tried with every means to refuse a payout.

This post has been translated automatically

darkic1987
Visitor
Thank you for contacting the Malta Gaming Authority.

Please be informed that all B2C licensees are now required to make readily available to players the applicable procedures for referring a dispute to the operator's appointed Alternative Dispute Resolution Provider (ADR).

The approved ADR provider for Bethard Group Limited (nightrush.com) is ADR Group Consumer Dispute Scheme
http://www.consumer-dispute.co.uk/
Kindly direct your dispute to the appointed entity accordingly.


MGA response

Edit by Caro: Link corrected

This post has been translated automatically

Lucifer88neu
Rookie
If I have 20000 Euro on the casino account and now I get 5 Euro Bonus money from free spins, then my 20000 Euro do not become bonus money. That would be absolute nonsense

The 5 Euro Max Bet concerns the bonus money, so in this case 5 Euro

That should have to be separated quite finely on the part of the casino

Now to mix anything and then simply delete 7000 euros real money, that is not legal

I would stay behind in any case. The money was there before the bonus and it was real money. The bonus is on a completely different sheet of paper

Lg

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
I would also put all the levers in motion and stay on the matter.
I do not know the terms and conditions, and do not know if you have violated the terms and conditions, but you should still make friends with the thought that you do not get the money.
If it works then but, so much the better.

I wish you good luck in any case.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
from the "ice cream vendor" to the president malta is corrupt through and through
there one hand washes the other

This post has been translated automatically

wettibernd
Expert
Well, then continue with ADR, as the MGA has immediately removed itself from the line of fire

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

MisterL wrote on 18.12.2019 at 13:12: from the "ice cream vendor" to the president malta is corrupt through and through
there one hand washes the other

Exactly.

They have shown that even the cleaners fuerre cleanmachem take money.

Scandal.

This post has been translated automatically

darkic1987
Visitor
If they are licensed in Malta, what do the ADR have to do with it? I can also post the chat history, support tried to give me 3 different reasons which I could all refute. My questions were deliberately ignored

This post has been translated automatically

x00NY
Elite
darkic1987 wrote on 18/12/2019 at 20:13: If they are licensed in Malta, what do the ADR have to do with it? I can also gladly post the chat history, support tried to Nennen me 3 different reasons which I could invalidate all. My questions were deliberately ignored.

well you don't need to show us the chat history, we can't do anything. As I said, try it at madre, try it at ADR. but don't get your hopes up that it will be successful

This post has been translated automatically

darkic1987
Visitor
Hi guys

i have read through the terms and conditions here again:

17.4 Maximum allowed bet in Casino and Live Casino when having an active bonus is €5 per bet/spin. Larger bets or playing on games from Group D may lead to confiscation of the bonus assets, free spins and possible winnings made with bonus money.

it clearly states confiscation of the bonus asset (in my case wins from the bonus/freeSpin), Free Spins?! and possible winnings made with bonus Money. (Winnings made with Bonus Money) I played down, so there were no wins.

Then can someone please explain to me why my balance before claiming any bonus should be affected by this rule?

All the points from the terms and conditions refer to the time after!


This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 02:47 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately