Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Lapalingo: [solved] Lapalingo has me...!!! On purpose? (Page 2)

Topic created on 08th Aug. 2020 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 14 | Views: 3,634
Anonym
Razerhead wrote on 08/08/2020 at 21:06: Thank you, Jokerboy. 😊👍

Let's see...I wrote Caro once. She seems to me to be the right contact person.

Gladly. Keep us here up to date. Glad if it turns out well for you
A violation of the terms and conditions is certainly present. According to your descriptions but more from both sides. Minus times minus results in plus.

This post has been translated automatically

Razerhead
Could not come to an agreement, unfortunately

Casio has dug into the deepest corners to not have to pay out, whether it was 3 or 5 years ago, does not matter. You do not find these things after 26 successful payouts and dozens of checks 😆.

So be very careful. If you play there, make sure at regular intervals that you do not violate anything and get it in writing, so that you have something in your hands in case of emergency.

Finally, however, a lousy action to keep such consequences consciously to beat at a high win to. So fingers away

This post has been translated automatically

Bvb1995
Expert
If they had refused at the first payout everything would be ok

But after 10 or more payouts to come with doppelacc is fresch

This post has been translated automatically

Razerhead
Yes, well, they have the upper hand. What can you do? I'm out of there now in any case.

Sorry for my language, but that was an A******** action. How can you build up trust there. They would certainly come with a dead 7 year old account around the corner and 50 payouts later. The turn it just the way it fits best for you.

This post has been translated automatically

Caro
Expert
As Razerhead wrote in the previous post, Lapalingo has looked at the case again in detail, but the casino has stuck to their decision. I'm really sorry for the thread creator, I would have been happy about a positive news or decision...The topic can therefore be closed.

This topic has been closed

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics5th May. 2024 at 01:30 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately