Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Cashi Mashi: [solved] Cashimashi payout over 7000€ (Page 4)

Topic created on 29th Aug. 2020 | Page: 4 of 5 | Answers: 43 | Views: 9,268
Kuno_Korken
Amateur
Falko wrote on 31.08.2020 at 20:33
Above all extremely painful for people who do not bathe in money. It's like when you lose your wallet with 750 euros in it and it can never be found again And the sum at TE is still much higher. Would like to know how much money the casino has already denied through these bonus violations in payouts in total.

Um, who does not bathe in money should not gamble anyway
Apart from that, he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And with great probability, the money will then still remain in the casino and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

This post has been translated automatically

Silence
Amateur
Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

I agree with you.

The bonus conditions are quite clear for me to understand

It is unambiguously stated that slots which offer bonusbuy feature are forbidden, not only the buy feature itself

This post has been translated automatically

Silence
Amateur
Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

I agree with you.

The bonus conditions are quite clear for me to understand

It clearly states that slots that offer bonusbuy feature are prohibited, not just the buy feature itself

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15

Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood, the money will then still remain in the casino and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

and if you come up then find what again not to pay out

even if it is reworked it's bullshit where a vielzocker not just so draufkommt because there is just felt only this rule on this one side...

well

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Kuno_Korken wrote on 02.09.2020 at 13:15
Um, anyone who doesn't bathe in money shouldn't gamble anyway
Apart from that he got his Deposit back after all - so nothing lost.
And in all likelihood the money will then remain in the casino anyway and gambled away - has already worked once "to come up".

Apart from that CashiMashi has revised their terms and conditions especially because of one of these cases.
Before, the point was much more unclear and clearly misunderstood.
Now they have updated the point and it clearly states there what is allowed and what is not.
But if you don't take the time to inform yourself properly you don't have to get upset nor shout out loud Blacklist BLACKLIST.

dID EXTRA. EXTRA. and now everything is peachy because before the point was unclear - no wait, what was your wording again - "before the point was much more unclear". Short question: how can something that is so modestly formulated (in terms of unambiguous interpretation) have been "even more unclear" before? You have to get that right first. Chapeau

And now the guys & gals of Cashimashi have really taken so much trouble to reformulate their self-botted text junk, which is also only moderately successful btw - since one should already scream HURRA HURRA CASINO and not BLACKLISTED. (by the way, it makes sense not to yell at your online conversation partners. that's really extremely unpleasant)

Anyway, I'm completely with you, I wanted to say: Great they did that - and in no way is the whole rule (including their 1st and also 2nd version) a deliberately placed trap in the hope to maximize their own profit by not paying out the win of their customers.
It is also more than fair to give the TE his deposit back - let him be happy! Where the good-for-nothing puts everything back into the machines anyway, this is a sign of great foresight and forbearance on the part of the casino. So gratitude would be appropriate

Yo

Cashimashi pulls there really ne awesome number through - but you have with your post here just shot the bird. All respect.





This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel
Experienced
redfoxx wrote on 12/09/2020 at 04:46 PM
dID REVISED. EXTRA. and now everything is spiffy because before the point was unclear - no wait, what was your wording again - "before the point was much more unclear". Short question: how can something that is so modestly formulated (in terms of unambiguous interpretation) have been "even more unclear" before? You have to get that right first. Chapeau

And now the guys & gals of CashiMashi have really taken so much trouble to reformulate their self-botted text junk, which is also only moderately successful btw - since one should already scream HURRA HURRA CASINO and not BLACKLISTED. (by the way, it makes sense not to yell at your online conversation partners. that's really extremely unpleasant)

Anyway, I'm completely with you, I wanted to say: Great they did that - and in no way is the whole rule (including their 1st and also 2nd version) a deliberately placed trap in the hope to maximize their own profit by not paying out the win of their customers.
It is also more than fair to give the TE his Deposit back - let him be happy! Where the good-for-nothing puts everything back into the machines anyway, this is a sign of great foresight and forbearance on the part of the casino. So gratitude would be appropriate

Yo

Cashimashi pulls there really ne awesome number through - but you have with your post here just shot the bird. All respect.






That should be all there is to it. Just do not play at Gammix Ltd. casinos

This post has been translated automatically

Kuno_Korken
Amateur
redfoxx wrote on 12/09/2020 at 04:46 PM
dID REVISED. EXTRA. and now everything is spiffy because before the point was unclear - no wait, what was your wording again - "before the point was much more unclear". Short question: how can something that is so modestly formulated (in terms of unambiguous interpretation) have been "even more unclear" before? You have to get that right first. Chapeau

And now the guys & gals of CashiMashi have really taken so much trouble to reformulate their self-botted text junk, which is also only moderately successful btw - since one should already scream HURRA HURRA CASINO and not BLACKLISTED. (by the way, it makes sense not to yell at your online conversation partners. that's really extremely unpleasant)

Anyway, I'm completely with you, I wanted to say: Great they did that - and in no way is the whole rule (including their 1st and also 2nd version) a deliberately placed trap in the hope to maximize their own profit by not paying out the win of their customers.
It is also more than fair to give the TE his Deposit back - let him be happy! Where the good-for-nothing puts everything back into the machines anyway, this is a sign of great foresight and forbearance on the part of the casino. So gratitude would be appropriate

Yo

Cashimashi pulls there really ne awesome number through - but you have with your post here just shot the bird. All respect.






Even before that the point was to understand and if you do not understand it, then you ask and hedge?
But of course it is easier to always blame the other party.
Ignorance does not protect from punishment - you do not need to write half a novel.
The AGB's are accepted with the registration - finished.
Is also not so that it can not still play enough other casinos, if one does not like a AGB Passus.
I don't have to tell you about the possibility of simply playing without a bonus if you don't feel like reading the terms and conditions.

This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel
Experienced
Kuno_Korken wrote on 12.09.2020 at 15:05
Even before that the point was to understand and if you don't understand it, then you ask and hedge?
But of course it is definitely easier to always blame the other person.
Ignorance does not protect against punishment - you do not need to write half a novel.
The AGB's are accepted with the registration - finished.
Is also not so that it can not still play enough other casinos, if one does not like a AGB Passus.
I don't have to tell you about the possibility of simply playing without a bonus if you don't feel like reading the terms and conditions.

Can only shake your head that you continuously defend this rip-off here. Tell your employer to start behaving like a serious casino operator.

This post has been translated automatically

SunSun13
Amateur
derzweifel wrote on 12.09.2020 at 16:13
Can only shake your head that you continuously defend this rip-off here. Tell your employer they should start behaving like a reputable casino operator.

Exactly the same thing I was thinking ! Especially the one about the employer....oh man.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
derzweifel wrote on 12.09.2020 at 16:13
Can only shake your head that you continuously defend this rip-off here. Tell your employer they should start behaving like a reputable casino operator.

haha am times for fun all his comments through ) Funny guy


This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd May. 2024 at 10:23 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately