Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

News & Notices: Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined! (Page 11)

Topic created on 01st Mar. 2019 | Page: 11 of 13 | Answers: 121 | Views: 22,505
upola
Legend
OpaOma wrote on 03/03/2019 at 12:54 PM
... then the mental dünnpfiff will hopefully finally less

Yes and that from your mouth...that has something.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
robby811 wrote on 03/03/2019 at 13:03
Who is lude ??

meant the libido,sorry

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
upola wrote on 03/03/2019 at 13:21
Yes and that from your mouth...that has something.

and you I had almost forgotten.also such a candidate.

This post has been translated automatically

Mitchmachine91
Rookie
Ludio wrote on 03/03/2019 at 10:35 AM
And he uploaded a winning picture too...

Briefly on this..I was advised by some to sleep on it for a night and let everything sink in. This I have done, even now two nights.

In the future I will keep out of all discussions here.

I will if me what upsets or angers, first of all notebook to fold or cell phone put away and me before consider what I write and not something what I regret afterwards

If I express criticism, I will before well think about whether this is so appropriate, or not

I will use the forum from now on only to ask questions if I want to know something, or answer questions if I can. From all other I keep myself out.

If I break this rule, I will voluntarily donate a Paysafecard to someone I can't deal with here (I think this alone will keep me from falling into old patterns).


obviously you realize that some is exaggerated, which could have been spared... But insight is the beginning... I find good if you can also admit it... Thumbs up👍👍

This post has been translated automatically

Counter
Experienced
Marqes wrote on 03/02/2019 01:17: I would like to make my opinion known, especially regarding Ludio and Begbie.

First of all, this is a fine thing what Gamblejoe is doing and diligently giving away paysafe cards every month.
But you also have to understand why they are doing this.
This is primarily not about love, but about traffic and a good ranking on Google and thus many, many new users and a lot of Affiliate income.

There are many gamblers who enter in Google, for example, free Paysafe card and then they land here on the page.

All this is also completely legitimate, Gamblejoe is a company and wants / needs to earn money.

Ludio is of the opinion that old regular users who sometimes make a lot of effort, answer many questions and help many other users (which in turn should actually -also- be the work of the Gamblejoe team), should be rewarded more than those who register (only) here to dust off Psc cards.

And honestly, I share this opinion.
But Gamblejoe wants to encourage new users to sign up here, because they want to have many users and many revenues and preferably be displayed at the top of Google.

My suggestion would be to give away half of the lottery tickets to new users and the other half to regular users who are very involved in the forum, help other users and have been registered here for a certain period of time.
Thus, all would be satisfied.

As I said, I don't want to offend anyone, it's just an idea.
Personally, I am satisfied, for example, that I have already won here several times.

But I am always of the opinion that diligence must be rewarded.

Kind regards 🙂

Good morning Marques,

thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 runs in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.

Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.

Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".

So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.

And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, because there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win

I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).

By the way, there are users here who write less (sometimes without a single forum post), but contribute many winning pictures, videos, comments or other things. But these are also among the oldest users in our community. As I said, it is not easy to determine who is a "regular user".

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Counter wrote on 03/04/2019 08:33 PM

Good morning Marques,

thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 passes in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.

Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.

Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".

So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.

And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, since there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win

I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).



Morning. You will never be able to please everyone, unfortunately. I am happy with the way it is but if there is a change so that regular users have a higher chance of winning I would welcome it.

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Counter wrote on 03/04/2019 08:33: why there is no really easy solution for this PSC issue.

there is a simple solution that would probably make everyone involved much happier: lock current winners in the following month.

This post has been translated automatically

m****9
The question is now who is counted to the "regulars", and if from when one belongs to it?!

This post has been translated automatically

gagapapamama
Expert
But continue as before, those who qualify in the Pot and done, but does not make such a fuss about 25.00 €. Is but a nice gesture of GambleJoe with the lottery and if you do not win, you just do not win and the "Lebbe goes on".

This post has been translated automatically

Insa24
Top Member
Marqes wrote on 03/02/2019 01:17: I would like to make my opinion known, especially regarding Ludio and Begbie.

First of all, this is a fine thing Gamblejoe is doing and diligently giving away paysafe cards every month.
But you also have to understand why they are doing this.
This is primarily not about love, but about traffic and a good ranking on Google and thus many, many new users and a lot of Affiliate income.

There are many gamblers who enter in Google, for example, free Paysafe card and then they land here on the page.

All this is also completely legitimate, Gamblejoe is a company and wants / needs to earn money.

Ludio is of the opinion that old regular users who sometimes make a lot of effort, answer many questions and help many other users (which in turn should actually -also- be the work of the Gamblejoe team), should be rewarded more than those who register (only) here to dust off Psc cards.

And honestly, I share this opinion.
But Gamblejoe wants to encourage new users to sign up here, because they want to have many users and many revenues and preferably be displayed at the top of Google.

My suggestion would be to give away half of the lottery tickets to new users and the other half to regular users who are very involved in the forum, help other users and have been registered here for a certain period of time.
Thus, all would be satisfied.

As I said, I don't want to offend anyone, it's just an idea.
Personally, I am satisfied, for example, that I have already won here several times.

But I am always of the opinion that diligence must be rewarded.

Kind regards 🙂

But this "two-class policy" is nonsense!
I think, just because GJ has so many registered users and it has become so confusing by new registrations à la "Dumdidumringer" (or what was the name of the, with the 4 accounts here, who has participated in the lottery on each account), you have increased the score from 500 to 750.
However, I agree with you on one thing: I think that the content on which there are a lot of points should be better checked by the team. So that the PC monitor during the game is not filmed with the cell phone camera. Or that sound is mandatory, for example. Or so

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Jun. 2024 at 09:35 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately