Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
3rd Mar. 2019, at 07:50 pm CET#104
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Ludio wrote on 03/03/2019 at 10:35 AM
And he uploaded a winning picture too...
Briefly on this..I was advised by some to sleep on it for a night and let everything sink in. This I have done, even now two nights.
In the future I will keep out of all discussions here.
I will if me what upsets or angers, first of all notebook to fold or cell phone put away and me before consider what I write and not something what I regret afterwards
If I express criticism, I will before well think about whether this is so appropriate, or not
I will use the forum from now on only to ask questions if I want to know something, or answer questions if I can. From all other I keep myself out.
If I break this rule, I will voluntarily donate a Paysafecard to someone I can't deal with here (I think this alone will keep me from falling into old patterns).
obviously you realize that some is exaggerated, which could have been spared... But insight is the beginning... I find good if you can also admit it... Thumbs up👍👍
Marqes wrote on 03/02/2019 01:17: I would like to make my opinion known, especially regarding Ludio and Begbie.
First of all, this is a fine thing what Gamblejoe is doing and diligently giving away paysafe cards every month.
But you also have to understand why they are doing this.
This is primarily not about love, but about traffic and a good ranking on Google and thus many, many new users and a lot of Affiliate income.
There are many gamblers who enter in Google, for example, free Paysafe card and then they land here on the page.
All this is also completely legitimate, Gamblejoe is a company and wants / needs to earn money.
Ludio is of the opinion that old regular users who sometimes make a lot of effort, answer many questions and help many other users (which in turn should actually -also- be the work of the Gamblejoe team), should be rewarded more than those who register (only) here to dust off Psc cards.
And honestly, I share this opinion.
But Gamblejoe wants to encourage new users to sign up here, because they want to have many users and many revenues and preferably be displayed at the top of Google.
My suggestion would be to give away half of the lottery tickets to new users and the other half to regular users who are very involved in the forum, help other users and have been registered here for a certain period of time.
Thus, all would be satisfied.
As I said, I don't want to offend anyone, it's just an idea.
Personally, I am satisfied, for example, that I have already won here several times.
But I am always of the opinion that diligence must be rewarded.
Kind regards 🙂
Good morning Marques,
thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 runs in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.
Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.
Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".
So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.
And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, because there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win
I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).
By the way, there are users here who write less (sometimes without a single forum post), but contribute many winning pictures, videos, comments or other things. But these are also among the oldest users in our community. As I said, it is not easy to determine who is a "regular user".
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 passes in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.
Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.
Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".
So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.
And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, since there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win
I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).
Morning. You will never be able to please everyone, unfortunately. I am happy with the way it is but if there is a change so that regular users have a higher chance of winning I would welcome it.
But continue as before, those who qualify in the Pot and done, but does not make such a fuss about 25.00 €. Is but a nice gesture of GambleJoe with the lottery and if you do not win, you just do not win and the "Lebbe goes on".
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
4th Mar. 2019, at 09:09 am CET#110
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Marqes wrote on 03/02/2019 01:17: I would like to make my opinion known, especially regarding Ludio and Begbie.
First of all, this is a fine thing Gamblejoe is doing and diligently giving away paysafe cards every month.
But you also have to understand why they are doing this.
This is primarily not about love, but about traffic and a good ranking on Google and thus many, many new users and a lot of Affiliate income.
There are many gamblers who enter in Google, for example, free Paysafe card and then they land here on the page.
All this is also completely legitimate, Gamblejoe is a company and wants / needs to earn money.
Ludio is of the opinion that old regular users who sometimes make a lot of effort, answer many questions and help many other users (which in turn should actually -also- be the work of the Gamblejoe team), should be rewarded more than those who register (only) here to dust off Psc cards.
And honestly, I share this opinion.
But Gamblejoe wants to encourage new users to sign up here, because they want to have many users and many revenues and preferably be displayed at the top of Google.
My suggestion would be to give away half of the lottery tickets to new users and the other half to regular users who are very involved in the forum, help other users and have been registered here for a certain period of time.
Thus, all would be satisfied.
As I said, I don't want to offend anyone, it's just an idea.
Personally, I am satisfied, for example, that I have already won here several times.
But I am always of the opinion that diligence must be rewarded.
Kind regards 🙂
But this "two-class policy" is nonsense!
I think, just because GJ has so many registered users and it has become so confusing by new registrations à la "Dumdidumringer" (or what was the name of the, with the 4 accounts here, who has participated in the lottery on each account), you have increased the score from 500 to 750.
However, I agree with you on one thing: I think that the content on which there are a lot of points should be better checked by the team. So that the PC monitor during the game is not filmed with the cell phone camera. Or that sound is mandatory, for example. Or so
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym
Yes and that from your mouth...that has something.
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Nobody has liked this post so far
meant the libido,sorry
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Nobody has liked this post so far
and you I had almost forgotten.also such a candidate.
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post: Anonym
obviously you realize that some is exaggerated, which could have been spared... But insight is the beginning... I find good if you can also admit it... Thumbs up👍👍
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post:
Christoph, 
Marqes, 
Popi2099
Good morning Marques,
thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 runs in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.
Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.
Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".
So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.
And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, because there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win
I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).
By the way, there are users here who write less (sometimes without a single forum post), but contribute many winning pictures, videos, comments or other things. But these are also among the oldest users in our community. As I said, it is not easy to determine who is a "regular user".
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post:
Insa24, m****9
Morning. You will never be able to please everyone, unfortunately. I am happy with the way it is but if there is a change so that regular users have a higher chance of winning I would welcome it.
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym, Anonym, m****9
there is a simple solution that would probably make everyone involved much happier: lock current winners in the following month.
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post:
Christoph, 
Counter
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Liked this post:
Christoph, 
Jenn-R
This post has been translated automatically
Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined!
Nobody has liked this post so far
But this "two-class policy" is nonsense!
I think, just because GJ has so many registered users and it has become so confusing by new registrations à la "Dumdidumringer" (or what was the name of the, with the 4 accounts here, who has participated in the lottery on each account), you have increased the score from 500 to 750.
However, I agree with you on one thing: I think that the content on which there are a lot of points should be better checked by the team. So that the PC monitor during the game is not filmed with the cell phone camera. Or that sound is mandatory, for example. Or so
This post has been translated automatically