Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

News & Notices: Paysafecard promotions (endless discussions)

Topic created on 28th Mar. 2018 | Page: 1 of 4 | Answers: 35 | Views: 6,030
Daniel
Elite
I've had a wide variety of users writing to me for days about the Paysafecard promotions, so I honestly can't hear, see, feel, smell or taste the word Paysafecard anymore. We got a lot of input and will also make the system better in the next 2 months. The first improvement will come next month and the month after next the whole thing should be as fair as possible. But for this month we can't change anything now without losing credibility.

It is now as it is and if someone is really only here because of the PSCs, then he gets his 10€, 25€, 50€, 75€ or 100€ PSC and that's it. If we now adjust something afterwards, then we ourselves are worse than the worst Curacao casino.

Guys, it's just that when you introduce something new (that no one else has), not everything can always be perfect from day one. You just have to accept that life on this earth and maybe even in the whole universe can't be 100% fair. One can only try to make it fairer step by step within the scope of his possibilities.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Daniel, I am someone who has participated in these sorry discussions unwillingly, I begrudge EVERYONE here something who likes to contribute here. But if a user registers here today (!!!!!) and has 18,500 points because he has rated 1575 games (of 1600 that are listed here), then that is SPAM for me! That annoys me then also, therefore I have you for the first time to this thing here a mail send. And such a one has to be excluded for me from the action. If not, then it should be so. That at least is my point of view.

This post has been translated automatically

gagapapamama
Expert
And who is the user?
It is not the first time that someone dusts something and then he was no longer seen.
The gamblers try everything to get money so they can continue to gamble.
I still think it's a fair gesture from our Gamble Joes that they do something like this.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Someone will always be dissatisfied in the end I think, no matter how you solve it

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
gagapapamama wrote on 28/03/2018 at 20:31: And who is the user ?
It's not the first time that someone dusts something and then he was no longer seen.
The gamblers try everything to get money so they can continue to gamble.
I still think it's a fair gesture from our Gamble Joes that they do something like this.

Hawkk is the user that caught my eye here. Everyone can make his own picture if you go to the profile. Do not know if there are more on the road here...

This post has been translated automatically

Andrew789
Experienced
Yes exactly Ronny. I have also told Daniel that this is somehow unfair. I have already uploaded almost 250 pictures here, Aka uploads many videos and you are very active in the forum and then someone comes and gets 16,000 points...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Andrew789 wrote on 28/03/2018 at 20:37: Yes exactly Ronny. I also said that to Daniel that this is iwie unfair. I have already uploaded almost 250 pictures here, Aka uploads many videos and you are very active in the forum and then someone comes and gets 16,000 points...


That's exactly what I mean. Aka is making an insane effort with the videos here. That's a lot of work that he does. And he should then get less than someone who times in 2 hours all the games here senseless evaluate, where he certainly 80% of it does not even know? Sorry...there I have no understanding for it. It has always been said that someone who deliberately spams will be excluded from the action.

This post has been translated automatically

S****n
If it is possible to rate all 1600 games and get points for them, these users have done nothing wrong. If there is no restriction or fewer points from the system, he has just exhausted the possibilities. I also had the thought while reading: Why do not you come up with it yourself

I will now reap a shitstorm is already clear to me, but you have to say honestly, something is pretty smart if you get behind it.
Since there must be from the system simply limits e.g. only 3 games per day can be evaluated.

Or change the point system.
For a game rate 1 point
Produce video 500 points

Something like that.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
As I said, things are all noted but now it is just the way it is and next month will be better. If someone should really be here only because of the PSCs, then that is just unique. The whole thing is also a practical experiment for us. There is more planned for GambleJoe in a more distant future but you have to experiment small and open-ended first and see how things develop.

Sure, you can say now, this and that could have been foreseen but I have also often experienced that I was wrong in my predictions. Sometimes you have to try something in practice and nobody really gets hurt. The worst thing that can happen is that the wrong people will profit. In the long run the "good" users will profit more from GambleJoe and if this is not feasible and the disputes become too big, then unfortunately this experiment has failed and cannot be expanded any further.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
ShinShan wrote on 28/03/2018 at 20:49: If it is possible to rate all 1600 games and get points for it, these users have done nothing wrong. If there is no restriction or less points from the system, he has just exhausted the possibilities. I also had the thought while reading: Why do not you come up with it yourself

I will now reap a shitstorm is already clear to me, but you have to say honestly, something is pretty smart if you get behind it.
Since there must be from the system simply limits e.g. only 3 games per day can be evaluated.

Or change the point system.
For a game rate 1 point
Produce video 500 points

Something like that.


The games should be evaluated here objectively, so after own experience. I may doubt that he knows all the games he reviews, what should be right about it?

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics5th Oct. 2024 at 11:13 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately