Both Wildz and DrückGlück have been established on the market for years, so almost every player will be able to write a review. However, I wonder if this is desirable?
Because due to the regulation there are further restrictions that are not obvious at first glance (e.g.; loyalty program / rewards for regular players // general game / bonus offer).
So to say, some ratings are outdated and only conditionally relevant, but they are still included in the rating. This problem will increase in the future, so we should work on a solution to avoid misleading conclusions in the future
Both Wildz and DrückGlück have been established on the market for years, so I guess almost every player will be able to write a review of their experience. However, I wonder if this is desirable?
Because due to the regulation there are further restrictions that are not obvious at first glance (e.g.; loyalty program / rewards for regular players // general game / bonus offer).
So to say, some ratings are outdated and only conditionally relevant, but they are still included in the rating. This problem will increase in the future, so we should work on a solution to avoid misleading conclusions in the future
This is definitely a valid point. Maybe Matthias will write something about it, but otherwise I'll take it up and address it in the team.
Both Wildz and DrückGlück have been established on the market for years, so I guess almost every player will be able to write a review of their experience. However, I wonder if this is desirable?
Because due to the regulation there are further restrictions that are not obvious at first glance (e.g.; loyalty program / rewards for regular players // general game / bonus offer).
So to say, some ratings are outdated and only conditionally relevant, but they are still included in the rating. This problem will increase in the future, so we should work on a solution to avoid misleading conclusions in the future
In the description text above we put it like this:
"In this list, the game stores are sorted by the user rating of the last 6 months."
And as I said, this affects all user ranking top lists, so also the list in the forum and on all other places where we issue user rankings.
Of the 34 reviews that DrückGlück has received in the last few months, 32 of them were written in the last 2 days, so the 2 older reviews hardly matter.
So I can reassure you that you are wrong if you think that the old reviews have an impact on the overall ranking.
In total, DrückGlück has 107 member reviews as of today.
Deleting these old reviews would distort the picture of the past and since they no longer have any influence on the casino ranking anyway, we decided to let them stand.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
In the description text above we put it like this:
"In this list, the game stores are sorted by the user rating of the last 6 months."
And as I said, this affects all user ranking top lists, so also the list in the forum and on all other places where we issue user rankings.
In the description text above we put it like this:
"In this list, the game stores are sorted by the user rating of the last 6 months."
And as I said, this affects all user ranking top lists, so also the list in the forum and on all other places where we issue user rankings.
Of the 34 reviews that DrückGlück has received in the last few months, 32 of them were written in the last 2 days, so the 2 older reviews hardly matter.
So I can reassure you that you are wrong if you think that the old reviews have an impact on the overall ranking.
In total, DrückGlück has 107 member reviews as of today.
Deleting these old reviews would distort the picture of the past and since they no longer have any influence on the casino ranking anyway, we decided to let them stand.
Or rather, gaming houses that once had a bad reputation now have no choice but to develop positively 😁
As bspw the bonus conditions may no longer be interpreted in such a way that the gambling house has a reason to refuse the payout!
Just as the payout amount may no longer be regulated to a certain amount if you have claimed a bonus offer!
Only with no Deposit offers a maximum cash out amount may be fixed.
So all in all I find that the German gambling contract is quite in our sense, if one sees over trifles like 5 sec. and the Max Bet Rule away 😎👍
BinGOLD wrote on 28.01.2023 at 22:59:
Or rather, game stores that once had a bad reputation, now have no choice but to develop positively 😁
Like bspw the bonus conditions may no longer be interpreted in such a way that the spielothek has a reason to refuse the payout!
Just as the payout amount may no longer be regulated to a certain amount if you have claimed a bonus offer!
Only with no Deposit offers a maximum cash out amount may be fixed.
So all in all I find that the German gambling contract is quite in our sense, if one sees over trifles like 5 sec. and the Max Bet Rule away 😎👍
Your serious? "the German gambling treaty stands in our sense", have before the great contract ALWAYS received my money (apart from generally unseriöse sides), one did not NEED this nonsense.one could play in peace (without lowered RTP's or 5 sec.rule) and also win times what good.In addition, you could also make sports bets in peace or play in the live casino.You are also not with eg SOW verifications, selfies, naked pictures or anything else before the great contract been annoyed.I need this shit, German gambling treaty (which only serves to rip off the players), NOT.How can you find something good, honestly?🤷
Personally, I wish my sites from the past back and find that everything since the 1.7.2021 concerns just a disaster
Donnie wrote on 29.01.2023 at 22:53:
Your serious? "the German gambling treaty stands in our sense",have before the great contract ALWAYS received my money(times apart from generally unseriöse sides),one did not NEED this nonsense.One could play in peace(without lowered RTP's or 5 sec.rule) and also win times what good.In addition, you could also make sports bets in peace or play in the live casino.You are also not with eg SOW verifications, selfies, naked pictures or anything else before the great contract been annoyed.I need this shit, German gambling treaty (which only serves to rip off the players), NOT.How can you find something good, honestly?🤷
Personally, I wish my sites from the past back and find that everything since the 1.7.2021 concerns just a disaster
Donnie wrote on 29.01.2023 at 22:53:
Your serious? "the German gambling treaty stands in our sense",have before the great contract ALWAYS received my money(times apart from generally unseriöse sides),one did not NEED this nonsense.One could play in peace(without lowered RTP's or 5 sec.rule) and also win times what good.In addition, you could also make sports bets in peace or play in the live casino.You are also not with eg SOW verifications, selfies, naked pictures or anything else before the great contract been annoyed.I need this shit, German gambling treaty (which only serves to rip off the players), NOT.How can you find something good, honestly?🤷
Personally, I wish my sites from the past back and find that everything since the 1.7.2021 concerns just a disaster
I'm right there with you. Twin casino, soltmillion and others left the German market forever. sunmaker and OneCasino remained but are absolutely no fun anymore. Lapalingo held out the longest. But as of this week, they have a license. Redrake games?, Elk? Megaway classics like Bonanza or Extra Chili are all gone.
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Andre, Anonym, 
drake, 
garfield68, 
ilo030ilo, 
Max_Bet, 
Naderdenny39, 
roccoammo11
https://www.gamblejoe.com/online-spielotheken/drueckglueck/detail/
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Hightower, 
Naderdenny39
Both Wildz and DrückGlück have been established on the market for years, so almost every player will be able to write a review. However, I wonder if this is desirable?
Because due to the regulation there are further restrictions that are not obvious at first glance (e.g.; loyalty program / rewards for regular players // general game / bonus offer).
So to say, some ratings are outdated and only conditionally relevant, but they are still included in the rating. This problem will increase in the future, so we should work on a solution to avoid misleading conclusions in the future
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post: Anonym,
denyo123, 
Naderdenny39, 
Tingeltini
This is definitely a valid point. Maybe Matthias will write something about it, but otherwise I'll take it up and address it in the team.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post: Anonym,
Naderdenny39, 
roccoammo11, 
Tingeltini
Hello Royal777,
If you look at the rating details page of DrückGlück you will find 2 tables:
1. "Ø Last 6 months: 76.3% (34 ratings)"
as well as
2. "DrückGlück overall rating: 66.6 % (107 reviews)"
We are aware that casinos can develop positively or negatively and therefore we use only the ratings of the last 6 months for all user ranking top lists .
See: https://www.gamblejoe.com/online-spielotheken/alle/?search=&sort=2
In the description text above we put it like this:
"In this list, the game stores are sorted by the user rating of the last 6 months."
And as I said, this affects all user ranking top lists, so also the list in the forum and on all other places where we issue user rankings.
Of the 34 reviews that DrückGlück has received in the last few months, 32 of them were written in the last 2 days, so the 2 older reviews hardly matter.
So I can reassure you that you are wrong if you think that the old reviews have an impact on the overall ranking.
In total, DrückGlück has 107 member reviews as of today.
Deleting these old reviews would distort the picture of the past and since they no longer have any influence on the casino ranking anyway, we decided to let them stand.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Matthias, 
Naderdenny39
Thanks, I interpreted the description differently
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Naderdenny39
Or rather, gaming houses that once had a bad reputation now have no choice but to develop positively 😁
As bspw the bonus conditions may no longer be interpreted in such a way that the gambling house has a reason to refuse the payout!
Just as the payout amount may no longer be regulated to a certain amount if you have claimed a bonus offer!
Only with no Deposit offers a maximum cash out amount may be fixed.
So all in all I find that the German gambling contract is quite in our sense, if one sees over trifles like 5 sec. and the Max Bet Rule away 😎👍
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
gamble1, 
hardcoverdude, 
Max_Bet, 
Naderdenny39, 
Nik89, 
roccoammo11, 
schwede666, 
WhatAboutTism, 
xorbit2033
Your serious? "the German gambling treaty stands in our sense", have before the great contract ALWAYS received my money (apart from generally unseriöse sides), one did not NEED this nonsense.one could play in peace (without lowered RTP's or 5 sec.rule) and also win times what good.In addition, you could also make sports bets in peace or play in the live casino.You are also not with eg SOW verifications, selfies, naked pictures or anything else before the great contract been annoyed.I need this shit, German gambling treaty (which only serves to rip off the players), NOT.How can you find something good, honestly?🤷
Personally, I wish my sites from the past back and find that everything since the 1.7.2021 concerns just a disaster
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Naderdenny39
Nude pictures 😂
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Muschmusch, 
Naderdenny39
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Naderdenny39, 
schwede666
I'm right there with you. Twin casino, soltmillion and others left the German market forever. sunmaker and OneCasino remained but are absolutely no fun anymore. Lapalingo held out the longest. But as of this week, they have a license. Redrake games?, Elk? Megaway classics like Bonanza or Extra Chili are all gone.
This post has been translated automatically