it didn't even notice that you only filled up the 100 posts...don't worry about it
Well if she has made such an effort then let her rate what the stuff holds! there are many silent readers who are too lazy to contribute something or don't feel like having group discussions..even sometimes very understandable with all the insults just because something doesn't work for someone or has a different opinion..they are not all rip-offs who would like to get a hundred posts full.before I registered here I was online here almost every day for a year and a half anyway....
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
22nd Apr. 2024, at 07:34 pm CEST#327
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
roccoammo11 wrote on April 22nd, 2024 at 7:27 pm:
Well if she has made such an effort then let her rate what the stuff holds! there are now many silent readers who are too lazy to contribute something or don't feel like having group discussions..even sometimes very understandable with all the insults just because something doesn't work for someone or has a different opinion..they are not all rip-offs who would like to get a hundred posts full.before I registered here I was online here almost every day for a year and a half anyway....
Rocco, you're just too good for this world I still remember the "Playmaus case"...everyone sees what's going on, but you still jump aside even in the toughest farming. Somehow that also honors you...but at least I can't really understand that
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
22nd Apr. 2024, at 07:42 pm CEST#328
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Langhans wrote on 22.04.2024 at 19:34:
Rocco, you're just too good for this world I still remember the "Fall Playmaus"...everyone sees what's going on, but you still jump aside even in the toughest farming. Somehow that also honors you...but at least I can't really understand that
You seem to have nothing else to do but make stupid arguments ... With over 2000 posts in 2 years. Would have understood your reasoning if I was a new member but have been a member for 6 years
Linawayne31 wrote on April 22nd, 2024 at 7:42 pm:
You seem to have nothing else to do but make stupid arguments ... With over 2000 posts in 2 years. Would have understood your reasoning if I was a new member but have been a member for 6 years
but some people write 2,000 posts without ever having rated a casino. Incidentally, I would have understood your argument if the rule hadn't been changed and you didn't now need 100 posts to give a rating Man, it's just noticeable...there's nothing to shake about it, even if some people don't mind and others do
Linawayne31 wrote on April 22nd, 2024 at 7:42 pm:
You seem to have nothing else to do but make stupid arguments ... With over 2000 posts in 2 years. Would have understood your reasoning if I was a new member but have been a member for 6 years
I don't think you could/would have understood it.
Langhals has nothing against you being paid for the reviews. He was just criticizing your method. I can understand the criticism. Digging out old threads (app thread). You don't address the actual topic at all and just write that there should be more websites. What exactly is your post supposed to say? Then write very short posts... and worst of all: you write pointless, short posts every minute and that annoys a few because it's spam.
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think 3 a day!
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
it didn't even notice that you only filled up the 100 posts...don't worry about it
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
As if I started writing 100 posts today.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
gagapapamama, 
Linawayne31, 
Max_Bet, 
Schlumpi1010
Well if she has made such an effort then let her rate what the stuff holds! there are many silent readers who are too lazy to contribute something or don't feel like having group discussions..even sometimes very understandable with all the insults just because something doesn't work for someone or has a different opinion..they are not all rip-offs who would like to get a hundred posts full.before I registered here I was online here almost every day for a year and a half anyway....
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
that's why...that's exactly what I'm saying
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
Rocco, you're just too good for this world I still remember the "Playmaus case"...everyone sees what's going on, but you still jump aside even in the toughest farming. Somehow that also honors you...but at least I can't really understand that
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
You seem to have nothing else to do but make stupid arguments ... With over 2000 posts in 2 years. Would have understood your reasoning if I was a new member but have been a member for 6 years
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Saphira
but some people write 2,000 posts without ever having rated a casino. Incidentally, I would have understood your argument if the rule hadn't been changed and you didn't now need 100 posts to give a rating Man, it's just noticeable...there's nothing to shake about it, even if some people don't mind and others do
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post:
Langhans, 
Saphira
I don't think you could/would have understood it.
Langhals has nothing against you being paid for the reviews. He was just criticizing your method. I can understand the criticism. Digging out old threads (app thread). You don't address the actual topic at all and just write that there should be more websites. What exactly is your post supposed to say? Then write very short posts... and worst of all: you write pointless, short posts every minute and that annoys a few because it's spam.
This post has been translated automatically