Feedback: More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Topic created on 21st Aug. 2019 | Page: 1 of 2 | Answers: 10 | Views: 3,284
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
21st Aug. 2019, at 07:39 pm CEST#1
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
One should not immediately take every "complaint" or "accusation of fraud" for full or immediately question a casino recommendation because of a simple problem.
However, I am already of the opinion that what some (also listed here) casinos pull off, should also entail a certain consequence.
- The GOWILD Casino, for example, is not the first time with extremely violent methods regarding verification. There are quite a few other reports about this store. And currently they just don't want to pay out again.
- At Casumo, the reports are now piling up as in the current case. Also this should not be simply accepted. Especially since there is no question that the casino is obviously out to get the user and is not concerned about compliance with any law
Btw, are there such cases as currently at Casumo (proof of income), already in other casinos?
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
21st Aug. 2019, at 08:05 pm CEST#2
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Mhmmm on the one hand you are certainly right - on the other hand, of course, GJ lives from the Affiliate income and there it is of course difficult to draw "consequences". Even the Lapalingo or wunderino story went yes not to end. Think the GJ here then just also legal problems with their contracts gets - apart from any lawyer threats / reminders of lawyers if GJ publicly criticizes an OC
You should always be clear as a player that the test can only be a snapshot and Jenachdem who tests the OC may also react faster because they know XYZ belongs to GJ 😉 ... just my thoughts on this without evidence or accusations ...!
I am in favor of each casino in the overview is displayed how many problems the casino has caused the users in the last X days. Would not be difficult to make a sub-forum for it and when creating you can then select the casino. False complaints or where the user no longer responds are simply deleted.
The overview I therefore recommend no one simply because it is no guarantee of seriousness or quality and also as a source of information only roughly to use. The information is often outdated, you can of course report this as a user and then it will be updated. Which makes it <nur>a simple overview</nur>.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
22nd Aug. 2019, at 02:14 am CEST#4
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Kleinkariert wrote on 08/21/2019 at 20:43: I'm all for that at each casino in the overview is displayed how many problems the casino has caused the users in the last X days.
Is certainly a good suggestion. However, if you read the reviews from time to time, it is already good to filter out whether it can currently come to problems with certain casinos
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
22nd Aug. 2019, at 02:24 am CEST#5
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
DocHoliday wrote on 08/22/2019 02:14 PM
Is certainly a good suggestion. However, if you read the reviews from time to time, you can already filter out well if there are currently problems with certain casinos
Well, GambleJoe is not an enforcement agency and certainly lives off affiliates
That rules out any criticism of any form, no matter how quiet and cautious.
However, with the volatility of the casino market, the list of casinos must be
constantly be changed. Conspicuous casinos away, new ones in. Only who slaughters
the cow, which it wants to milk ? Believe no one...... ... .is hard.....
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
23rd Aug. 2019, at 12:13 pm CEST#7
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I have already paid out at Sunplayer, BWIN, Videoslots, Wunderino, Drückglück.
I have never had any problems withdrawing.
I think if the bonus scheme 5€ prescribes then you should stick to it.
Or foreign account deposit.
Then it also works with the payout.
Which casino requires additional documents we can read under complaints
Accordingly, I avoid the OC.
Before I register in an OC, I read the reviews on Gj
This post has been translated automatically
B****e
Forum posts:4Member has been banned
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
23rd Aug. 2019, at 08:08 pm CEST#8
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Babooo76 wrote on 08/23/2019 12:13 PM
Before I register in an OC I read the reviews on Gj
--- post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---
BigDave wrote on 08/23/2019 8:08 PM
--- quote removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---
What do you mean not allowed to be mentioned? Bwin, etc are constantly mentioned in threads here but just not by the team. Some sites also do not want to be listed everywhere. You can at least write in the title bwin and also in casino you can select <Nicht hier gelistet>and then name the casino.
See there now no big problem. The user ratings for the rest of the casinos do not become worthless. There are hundreds of casinos, no Affiliate site has even remotely listed all casinos.</Nicht>
This post has been translated automatically
B****e
Forum posts:4Member has been banned
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
23rd Aug. 2019, at 09:32 pm CEST#10
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
--- Post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
However, I am already of the opinion that what some (also listed here) casinos pull off, should also entail a certain consequence.
- The GOWILD Casino, for example, is not the first time with extremely violent methods regarding verification. There are quite a few other reports about this store. And currently they just don't want to pay out again.
- At Casumo, the reports are now piling up as in the current case. Also this should not be simply accepted. Especially since there is no question that the casino is obviously out to get the user and is not concerned about compliance with any law
Btw, are there such cases as currently at Casumo (proof of income), already in other casinos?
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
You should always be clear as a player that the test can only be a snapshot and Jenachdem who tests the OC may also react faster because they know XYZ belongs to GJ 😉 ... just my thoughts on this without evidence or accusations ...!
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Liked this post:
DrPepper
The overview I therefore recommend no one simply because it is no guarantee of seriousness or quality and also as a source of information only roughly to use. The information is often outdated, you can of course report this as a user and then it will be updated. Which makes it <nur>a simple overview</nur>.
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Liked this post: Anonym
Is certainly a good suggestion. However, if you read the reviews from time to time, it is already good to filter out whether it can currently come to problems with certain casinos
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
I also see it that way.
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Liked this post:
Marqes
That rules out any criticism of any form, no matter how quiet and cautious.
However, with the volatility of the casino market, the list of casinos must be
constantly be changed. Conspicuous casinos away, new ones in. Only who slaughters
the cow, which it wants to milk ? Believe no one...... ... .is hard.....
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
I have never had any problems withdrawing.
I think if the bonus scheme 5€ prescribes then you should stick to it.
Or foreign account deposit.
Then it also works with the payout.
Which casino requires additional documents we can read under complaints
Accordingly, I avoid the OC.
Before I register in an OC, I read the reviews on Gj
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
--- post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
What do you mean not allowed to be mentioned? Bwin, etc are constantly mentioned in threads here but just not by the team. Some sites also do not want to be listed everywhere. You can at least write in the title bwin and also in casino you can select <Nicht hier gelistet>and then name the casino.
See there now no big problem. The user ratings for the rest of the casinos do not become worthless. There are hundreds of casinos, no Affiliate site has even remotely listed all casinos.</Nicht>
This post has been translated automatically
More consistent action by GJ against OC's.
Nobody has liked this post so far
--- Post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---
This post has been translated automatically