Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: More consistent action by GJ against OC's.

Topic created on 21st Aug. 2019 | Page: 1 of 2 | Answers: 10 | Views: 3,526
Anonym
One should not immediately take every "complaint" or "accusation of fraud" for full or immediately question a casino recommendation because of a simple problem.

However, I am already of the opinion that what some (also listed here) casinos pull off, should also entail a certain consequence.


- The GOWILD Casino, for example, is not the first time with extremely violent methods regarding verification. There are quite a few other reports about this store. And currently they just don't want to pay out again.
- At Casumo, the reports are now piling up as in the current case. Also this should not be simply accepted. Especially since there is no question that the casino is obviously out to get the user and is not concerned about compliance with any law


Btw, are there such cases as currently at Casumo (proof of income), already in other casinos?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Mhmmm on the one hand you are certainly right - on the other hand, of course, GJ lives from the Affiliate income and there it is of course difficult to draw "consequences". Even the Lapalingo or wunderino story went yes not to end. Think the GJ here then just also legal problems with their contracts gets - apart from any lawyer threats / reminders of lawyers if GJ publicly criticizes an OC

You should always be clear as a player that the test can only be a snapshot and Jenachdem who tests the OC may also react faster because they know XYZ belongs to GJ 😉 ... just my thoughts on this without evidence or accusations ...!

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
I am in favor of each casino in the overview is displayed how many problems the casino has caused the users in the last X days. Would not be difficult to make a sub-forum for it and when creating you can then select the casino. False complaints or where the user no longer responds are simply deleted.

The overview I therefore recommend no one simply because it is no guarantee of seriousness or quality and also as a source of information only roughly to use. The information is often outdated, you can of course report this as a user and then it will be updated. Which makes it <nur>a simple overview</nur>.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Kleinkariert wrote on 08/21/2019 at 20:43: I'm all for that at each casino in the overview is displayed how many problems the casino has caused the users in the last X days.

Is certainly a good suggestion. However, if you read the reviews from time to time, it is already good to filter out whether it can currently come to problems with certain casinos

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
DocHoliday wrote on 08/22/2019 02:14 PM

Is certainly a good suggestion. However, if you read the reviews from time to time, you can already filter out well if there are currently problems with certain casinos

I also see it that way.

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
Well, GambleJoe is not an enforcement agency and certainly lives off affiliates
That rules out any criticism of any form, no matter how quiet and cautious.
However, with the volatility of the casino market, the list of casinos must be
constantly be changed. Conspicuous casinos away, new ones in. Only who slaughters
the cow, which it wants to milk ? Believe no one...... ... .is hard.....

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I have already paid out at Sunplayer, bwin, Videoslots, Wunderino, Drückglück.

I have never had any problems withdrawing.

I think if the bonus scheme 5€ prescribes then you should stick to it.
Or foreign account deposit.

Then it also works with the payout.

Which casino requires additional documents we can read under complaints

Accordingly, I avoid the OC.

Before I register in an OC, I read the reviews on Gj

This post has been translated automatically

B****e
Babooo76 wrote on 08/23/2019 12:13 PM

Before I register in an OC I read the reviews on Gj


--- post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---


This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
BigDave wrote on 08/23/2019 8:08 PM
--- quote removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---

What do you mean not allowed to be mentioned? bwin, etc are constantly mentioned in threads here but just not by the team. Some sites also do not want to be listed everywhere. You can at least write in the title bwin and also in casino you can select <Nicht hier gelistet>and then name the casino.

See there now no big problem. The user ratings for the rest of the casinos do not become worthless. There are hundreds of casinos, no Affiliate site has even remotely listed all casinos.</Nicht>

This post has been translated automatically

B****e

--- Post removed. The user is a duplicate account of a previously permanently banned user. ---

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics8th Dec. 2024 at 01:48 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately