Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Gamblejoe scoring (Page 6)

Topic created on 12th Jun. 2019 | Page: 6 of 9 | Answers: 82 | Views: 13,705
Anonym
Blubbo33 wrote on 06/17/2019 2:56 PM
Oh Mr. Ludio did not complain, I stand corrected.

He just made a comment that nothing happens here even though he reported it.And the user won twice.
Who tells us that you do not have 2 accounts?
So you will never be able to prove something like that, if someone seriously intends to do so and is not stupid.

I even have 3 accounts, at least. If not even more

And that's why I write again and again that I am for the fact that there are ways to get these assholes out of here

Cool logic you have.🙃

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
This is the sugar for the horses, without this sugar nothing works
In the beginning there were users here who needed help because they were being screwed by casinos and Daniel or someone else from the team tried to sort it out with the casino manager. That's no longer the case, now it's about pushing Psc and draw more people to the forum, here it's about that people then later signs up in the other casinos listed here.
Without this lottery, gj has no chance
There are so many sites with reputable casino lists there you have to come up with something
The streamers do it exactly the same way and give back 4 to 5 thousand € to the viewers.
Only in such a way runs's...thus times after think
This all has its reasons and that is not the GJ here is a social office and every month Psc distributed. Here it is about business..and that is also good so...

Only you have to prevent it so people only register and spam to have higher chances or even 2 in 1 month wins, but what my and their users who have 1 account cheat,


Here times a bsp; a user has 5 account and spams with these only, and wins at the end 2 cards.

1 honest user who has 1 account does not spam and the user is cheated here by other users and that must not be.

Such a shit behavior from these people
As if it's only about the...and we all know that for a long time but I have no more Bock on something like that that's why I opened the topic that is called

Important improvements are necessary

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
Well then you have 3 chances to win at the end of the month
Congratulations

This post has been translated automatically

ruhrpott
Expert
First of all, thanks to the GJ team for sitting down, thinking and changing things!

To the whole multiaccount discussions: I am also of the opinion that one must prevent that, if technically possible, in any case. This is a forum, and each person has to write here also only with an account. PSC lottery or not, that's just the icing on the cake. I do not want to listen to or read the same, or even opposing opinion of several accounts umpteen times behind which then at the end of the day is the same person.

This post has been translated automatically

Desruptor
Amateur
Blubbo33 wrote on 06/17/2019 at 15:04: Well then you have 3 chances to win at the end of the month
Congratulations



  • Error 404 Brain Not Found - The requested brain (http://blubbo33.brain.de) was not found on this server




Back to the topic: I think it's a good change to lower the points for logging in every day - this way the forum will be more lively in general

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
I don't want to completely contradict Peter's comments, but look at it this way,
why get excited about something like that?
If I want to play I buy a card and good.

Unless I'm poor as a church mouse or highly addicted, then I would even understand the arguments.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
ruhrpott wrote on 06/17/2019 at 15:10: First of all, thanks to's GJ team that you sit down, think about and also have already changed things!

About all the multiaccount discussions: I agree that if it is technically possible, it should be prevented. This is a forum, and each person has to write here also only with an account. PSC lottery or not, that's just the icing on the cake. I do not want to listen to or read the same, or even opposing opinion of several accounts umpteen times behind which then at the end of the day is the same person.

Even worse, you write with jenand and learn only later that another person has put behind it. That was grusslig at that time and I am since then very skeptical about new users who write to me

This post has been translated automatically

ruhrpott
Expert

Ludio wrote on 06/17/2019 at 15:12
Even worse, one writes with jenand and learns only later that another person has put behind it. That was grusslig at the time and I am since then very skeptical of new users who write to me.

This is really crap, so I can understand your skepticism towards new people. Me it would probably not go differently...



@Blubbo33
You can't dismiss everything with "poor as a church mouse" or similar things. Fact is: There are PSC lotteries. And every real person has only one chance with one account. Everything else is brazen

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
I ask you to discuss this topic objectively, it brings none of you something to attack other users so "personally".
It also brings nothing in this situation to point the finger at other users to incite each other.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Yes, as Ludio says, that is the main problem here. I can understand most of the arguments here:

PSC lottery is shit for now. Personally, if I really want to gamble, I'll just pay in. I don't want to absolve myself from the fact that I like to participate in the lottery and am happy when I win. But it's not the main reason for me to participate in the forum

As often described here, the reason for the PSC action is clear and also understandable. Maybe the idea of rewarding the community resonates minimally somewhere, but the fact that this is mainly advertising and incentive, and thus a simple investment in the company, is relatively obvious and also not to be evaluated negatively. GambleJoe itself can also be quite indifferent to who wins a code

That is, on the one hand, we have a lottery of money to liven up the forum and the site. On the other hand there is the desire to run a high quality site about gambling. To somehow reconcile this is certainly not easy

Here cash money is raffled, in a forum, which consists to large parts of gambling addicts. By that I do NOT mean the absolute regular users who make meaningful posts, but the great mass of the membership. If I had to list members of Gamblejoe off the top of my head, I could think of maybe 25-40. In the lottery, however, are now well over 100 accounts qualified

I find it off-putting to write with a person who is actually someone else entirely. Or to read comments of such persons, maybe even to use my time to write a meaningful answer. In doing so, the person in question may not have even expressed an opinion, but simply made an unremarkable post with some made-up content more believable. This person is then not interested at all in what I have to say about it. This thought honestly diminishes my interest in continuing to be particularly active here. It is the simple fear combined with the logical insight that there are definitely fake and double accounts here, which mingle quite normally with the events

I understand not wanting to do away with the lottery.

I understand that it is not possible to check the identity of the members.

I understand that there is no easy solution to this problem.

I don't want to blame the GJ team at all for the situation, and I certainly don't want to impute the same ignorance as some others here. But I have found this circumstance troubling for a long time, have mentioned this very problem many times and so far it doesn't look to me like there is a solution. But I am glad to hear that it is being worked on. Sorry for the long post

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics14th Apr. 2024 at 02:53 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately