Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Roulette in general: Strategy Developer/Roulette (Page 3)

Topic created on 22nd Mar. 2018 | Page: 3 of 5 | Answers: 43 | Views: 7,850
P****1

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 09:07 pm CET#21
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
vivera365 wrote on 24/03/2018 at 21:04: There is no answer because of course it is once again mumbo jumbo without end...... .

Of course. If I had such a system which would work 100% then I would have used it for myself. There is certainly a hack.

This post has been translated automatically

s****y

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 09:11 pm CET#22
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
I am still available for factual and content-related questions!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 09:18 pm CET#23
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
I think everything is clear - thank you !

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 09:55 pm CET#24
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
I have a question about the content: Do your parameters assume that if the same result appears several times in a row (e.g. five times in a row red), the probability for the corresponding counter result (in the example it would be black) is higher for the next attempt?

This post has been translated automatically

s****y

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 10:02 pm CET#25
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
No, this procedure outlined by you is statistically not predictable. I act according to pure mathematical models!

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 10:20 pm CET#26
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Speedy wrote on 03/24/2018 at 22:02: No, this approach you outlined is not statistically predictable. I act according to pure mathematical models!

So it's about mathematically beatable after all?

This post has been translated automatically

s****y

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 10:25 pm CET#27
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
mathematically beatable would mean for me to predict every game, i can't. but i can statistically narrow down the consequential throw based on certain events!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 10:35 pm CET#28
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Okay, at least you don't make the thinking error...
However, it is still a mystery to me which assumptions/parameters/calculations give you the idea of being able to gain an advantage...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Strategy Developer/Roulette

24th Mar. 2018, at 11:17 pm CET#29
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Speedy wrote on 03/24/2018 at 22:25: mathematically beatable would mean for me to predict every game, i can not. but i can based on certain events, the consequential throw statistically narrow down!

And that is humbug.

Apart from the fact that you contradict yourself, how do you want to statistically limit a next event based on previous events, which is completely independent of these?

It is always the same.

If someone had found an impossible system why doesn't he make cash with it himself?
Why do they always offer it in some forums?
And of course, you never reveal it directly, because then you could reveal pretty quickly that it's all nonsense, but you hope to rip off a few gullible by private message.

It is quite simple:

What you claim is simply mathematically impossible. That is so. Period.

Therefore, any further discussion about it is unnecessary and your true intentions are clear.

This post has been translated automatically

S****n

Strategy Developer/Roulette

25th Mar. 2018, at 01:03 am CET#30
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
It is already good and important that the mathematical and physical laws stand above the human being.
Otherwise the universe would be probably one single chaos.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics12th May. 2024 at 05:13 am CEST

Jackpots
0
Miscellaneous
0
Miscellaneous
0
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately