Topic created on 14th Jul. 2018 | Page: 1 of 3 | Answers: 25 | Views: 4,393
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 12:39 am CEST#1
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
I'm sorry but I think that Julian is not suitable as a moderator. In my opinion, he lacks any sensitivity to even assess what it is actually about. If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. But then this forum is not better than all the others.
Lucifer88 wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:16: Totally unnecessary thread!
Yeah that's what I think too. In the past we didn't need something like a moderator at all. Why, because the users dealt with each other normally. The last few months it is getting very out of hand that some go here downright at the throat. Julian is already doing the right thing. Out with the troublemakers so that it runs here again normally.
Lucifer88 wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:16: Totally unnecessary thread!
Totally unnecessary comment!
No reasoning at all but the main thing is to throw something out. Great job son.
I'm not really satisfied with Julian's work either... It often seems to me that he's acting too biased and very rarely deals with criticism.
But everyone can still improve or change, I'm happy to be taught better.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 01:48 am CEST#5
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry but a moderator should have certain skills and not decide from the gut.
I was in many forums and all really all have failed because the mods and admins have lived out their power.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 02:54 am CEST#6
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
redriver67 wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:34 PM
Yes I think so too. In the past we didn't need something like a moderator at all. Why, because the users dealt with each other normally.
That's how it is... There was a completely different tone here. Bad as that has developed here... But some have feared and seen coming.
I think Julian is doing his job well.
Some people here lack the sensitivity to assess what is at stake or what is relevant, but I don't have that feeling with Julian.
Dipson wrote on 07/14/2018 at 00:39: I'm sorry but I think that Julian is not suitable as a moderator. He lacks, in my opinion, any sensitivity to even assess what the issue actually is. If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. But then this forum is not better than all the others.
Good morning,
well, this is a great way to start the weekend. No, not because of your "criticism" or opinion. But because of "If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. But then this forum is not better than all the others". You don't need to try to build up subtle pressure here to get us not to ban you for this post. There is no disposition to do that, even though it might seem in your post that someone on the team would do that. So far there have been no bans for criticizing GambleJoe, Online Casinos, etc. There are forum rules here in the forum and we want a normal interaction with each other, without the permanent hostility or provocation here. Different opinions are (and we have already stressed several times) generally no problem, it is how (sometimes I feel like an organ grinder) one brings this opinion across. Here in the forum is very often shot against the opinion of other users in a way that is not okay. In a way in which one tries opinions simply tries to represent as stupid and wrong. If then against what is said, it is suddenly "Ohhhh no freedom of speech?". And exactly there lies the problem. To refer to freedom of speech and others their opinion but do not want to concede. That's what always brings these unpleasant situations here in the forum. This is also where Julian steps in and does a good job with the few guidelines he has. We are working on making this more transparent so that such "misunderstandings" can no longer occur. I can say this much anyway, there were and there are so far no bans only because of criticism!
Dipson wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:48: Sorry but a moderator should definitely have certain skills and not decide on gut instinct.
I was in many forums and all really all have failed because the mods and admins have lived out their power.
And this is the problem. Some people are of the opinion "Mods and Admins want to live out their power". There are rules and these are to be kept. If then as here in the forum insults, provocations and anger to take, then Admins or Mods must intervene. They do not exercise power, but enforce rules and do their job. And Julian does this well and will get with the further developments here on GambleJoe also still further aids for his work, which facilitate him the work also still
I can only give my personal opinion on this: Thank you Julian. I just feel sorry for what you sometimes have to "deal" with here on the forum
Dipson wrote on 07/14/2018 at 00:39: I'm sorry but I think that Julian is not suitable as a moderator. He lacks, in my opinion, any sensitivity to even assess what the issue actually is. If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. But then this forum is not better than all the others.
why should you be banned for this? you can share your opinion as you like
as you do it now unfortunately many here,
--> they transfer their current private stress, displeasure about their own failed life, everything that is going wrong with them
simply times on other users or mods and try to let it out on those.
take you now times as an example because it is very obvious by your thread yesterday and your subsequent post until today.
the last 4 months no post (is ok, there is no writing obligation)
you have a therapy behind you that has probably not worked well, open a thread here in which you talk not only about one but the number of --> second chances <--.
you get good answers but you don't give a shit.
but at the same time you write in another thread that you just feel like shit and you want to let the bong go around
i quote again
So people now enough. You know, I'm feeling really shitty right now, but I haven't lost my sense of humor yet.
Let's form a drum circle, let the bong go around and philosophize about the meaning of life.
Come on down everybody g* Last modified by Dipson on 07/13/2018, at 19:40
and now you go julian he would not be capable enough as a mod?
the forum here is for you clearly a release valve for your own realization you would not manage to ever get back on your feet privately.
you should not be banned for nagging a moderator.
you should be temporarily banned from to give you the necessary support to wake up and take care of your existence.
the world around you is not the evil factor that does not want to play along with your new beginning,
it is the dipson himself who does not want to move enough and prefers to question the competence of others. i hope i could help you a little bit, it is only well meant, it has to click with you, not with others.
and to julian as a mod
i agree with the description of redriver.
think but he should have made it much earlier so consistent and is still very lenient. he also implements only existing points, discusses with the team and through pn he always tries to point out certain things first friendly. the latter makes no other forum, there zack is blocked and end.
where do we come if constantly the private grievances of some are reflected in attacks on random or specifically picked out other users?
right, it is on the part of gj everything always tightened, question is --> you want that?
a few months ago we did not need something like this, but the more good-naturedness prevails, the more it is exploited.
a forum is supposed to be a place of peaceful cooperation and not what some people want to make it
--> a transmission of their own problems, frustration because they have lost again, their own existence is going down the drain or other reasons for frustration.
the question is, however, who has set the cause for this? but of course it is always the others who are to blame.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 11:03 am CEST#10
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
redriver67 wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:34 PM
Yes I think so too. In the past we didn't need something like a moderator at all. Why, because the users dealt with each other normally.
So I already think that we would have needed a moderator already in more peaceful times
Because just less because of disputes, but because of the order ^^
Say, it makes a thread on a topic, to write a few people their opinion. 2 days later, a new thread with exactly the same topic is opened and the next day the 3rd
Every forum needs a moderator, which cares about law and order ^^
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: Anonym
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: Anonym,
Julian, 
RiverSong
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post:
Counter, 
Julian
Yeah that's what I think too. In the past we didn't need something like a moderator at all. Why, because the users dealt with each other normally. The last few months it is getting very out of hand that some go here downright at the throat. Julian is already doing the right thing. Out with the troublemakers so that it runs here again normally.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: Anonym,
Counter
Totally unnecessary comment!
No reasoning at all but the main thing is to throw something out. Great job son.
I'm not really satisfied with Julian's work either... It often seems to me that he's acting too biased and very rarely deals with criticism.
But everyone can still improve or change, I'm happy to be taught better.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
I was in many forums and all really all have failed because the mods and admins have lived out their power.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
That's how it is... There was a completely different tone here. Bad as that has developed here... But some have feared and seen coming.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post:
Counter, 
Julian, 
sippi
I think Julian is doing his job well.
Some people here lack the sensitivity to assess what is at stake or what is relevant, but I don't have that feeling with Julian.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post:
Christoph, 
Julian, 
sippi
Good morning,
well, this is a great way to start the weekend. No, not because of your "criticism" or opinion. But because of "If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. But then this forum is not better than all the others". You don't need to try to build up subtle pressure here to get us not to ban you for this post. There is no disposition to do that, even though it might seem in your post that someone on the team would do that. So far there have been no bans for criticizing GambleJoe, Online Casinos, etc. There are forum rules here in the forum and we want a normal interaction with each other, without the permanent hostility or provocation here. Different opinions are (and we have already stressed several times) generally no problem, it is how (sometimes I feel like an organ grinder) one brings this opinion across. Here in the forum is very often shot against the opinion of other users in a way that is not okay. In a way in which one tries opinions simply tries to represent as stupid and wrong. If then against what is said, it is suddenly "Ohhhh no freedom of speech?". And exactly there lies the problem. To refer to freedom of speech and others their opinion but do not want to concede. That's what always brings these unpleasant situations here in the forum. This is also where Julian steps in and does a good job with the few guidelines he has. We are working on making this more transparent so that such "misunderstandings" can no longer occur. I can say this much anyway, there were and there are so far no bans only because of criticism!
And this is the problem. Some people are of the opinion "Mods and Admins want to live out their power". There are rules and these are to be kept. If then as here in the forum insults, provocations and anger to take, then Admins or Mods must intervene. They do not exercise power, but enforce rules and do their job. And Julian does this well and will get with the further developments here on GambleJoe also still further aids for his work, which facilitate him the work also still
I can only give my personal opinion on this: Thank you Julian. I just feel sorry for what you sometimes have to "deal" with here on the forum
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post:
Julian, 
upola
why should you be banned for this? you can share your opinion as you like
as you do it now unfortunately many here,
--> they transfer their current private stress, displeasure about their own failed life, everything that is going wrong with them
simply times on other users or mods and try to let it out on those.
take you now times as an example because it is very obvious by your thread yesterday and your subsequent post until today.
the last 4 months no post (is ok, there is no writing obligation)
you have a therapy behind you that has probably not worked well, open a thread here in which you talk not only about one but the number of --> second chances <--.
you get good answers but you don't give a shit.
but at the same time you write in another thread that you just feel like shit and you want to let the bong go around
i quote again
and now you go julian he would not be capable enough as a mod?
the forum here is for you clearly a release valve for your own realization you would not manage to ever get back on your feet privately.
you should not be banned for nagging a moderator.
you should be temporarily banned from to give you the necessary support to wake up and take care of your existence.
the world around you is not the evil factor that does not want to play along with your new beginning,
it is the dipson himself who does not want to move enough and prefers to question the competence of others.
i hope i could help you a little bit, it is only well meant, it has to click with you, not with others.
and to julian as a mod
i agree with the description of redriver.
think but he should have made it much earlier so consistent and is still very lenient. he also implements only existing points, discusses with the team and through pn he always tries to point out certain things first friendly. the latter makes no other forum, there zack is blocked and end.
where do we come if constantly the private grievances of some are reflected in attacks on random or specifically picked out other users?
right, it is on the part of gj everything always tightened, question is --> you want that?
a few months ago we did not need something like this, but the more good-naturedness prevails, the more it is exploited.
a forum is supposed to be a place of peaceful cooperation and not what some people want to make it
--> a transmission of their own problems, frustration because they have lost again, their own existence is going down the drain or other reasons for frustration.
the question is, however, who has set the cause for this? but of course it is always the others who are to blame.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
So I already think that we would have needed a moderator already in more peaceful times
Because just less because of disputes, but because of the order ^^
Say, it makes a thread on a topic, to write a few people their opinion. 2 days later, a new thread with exactly the same topic is opened and the next day the 3rd
Every forum needs a moderator, which cares about law and order ^^
This post has been translated automatically