Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Current Topic CoronaVirus / Opinion, Exchange (Page 57)

Topic created on 27th Feb. 2020 | Page: 57 of 94 | Answers: 939 | Views: 143,455
Begbie
Elite
gamble1 wrote on 30.03.2020 at 13:06
There are currently two loud voices

1) Virus not so bad measures unjustified (mostly by virologists)

2) Virus much worse than flu etc... measures 100% justified

Do you already know this ? what do you think ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsExPrHCHbw&t=528s

^^

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Begbie wrote on 2020-03-30 at 2:50 pm
^^

Yes well ...... ... .

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Stromberg
Legend
I do not understand the meaning of the first question in his letter directly:

The basic assumption from previous experience is that 5% of those who test positive suffer a severe course.
Now I can take the 5% as a basis for extrapolations. That would be 5 people out of 100 tested positive.
Of these 100, perhaps only 50% develop symptoms and would be considered to have the disease according to the definition. Nevertheless, according to the basic assumption, it is 5% of the positively tested, so still 5 people out of 100.
The only difference is that of the group of people defined as having the disease, 10% would be used for the extrapolations. The result would be the same.
It would only make a difference if it was a question of whether the 5% were calculated from all those who tested positive or from all those who were ill according to the definition. But there the statement is clear, from all positive tested.

Or am I making a mistake in my thinking? 😂🤔

I have now taken the 50 percent out of the air, because it is easy to calculate. But the principle is the same.

I would also find random tests interesting and would volunteer to do them😁But they are already testing at the limit, and the resources required are currently scarce as far as I know. Presumably one therefore prefers to test specific suspected cases, so that they do not continue to run around in the area.

I am curious about the study that is to come. So seriously now!

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Who you can believe now is hard to say I think it is not quite as bad as some make it out to be but also not as safe as others make it out to be

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
gamble1 wrote on 30.03.2020 at 18:54 clock: Who you can now currently believe is hard to say I think it's not quite as bad as some make it out but also not as safe as others do again

I think it could be good!

This post has been translated automatically

Hexe4224
Amateur
ruhrpott wrote on 27.02.2020 at 01:03: I don't really give it a thought. If it gets me, that's the way it is, and can't be helped anyway. I deal with so many people on a daily basis, if I worried about it all the time, I'd go stupid. I also believe that it won't be long before the first case in the Ruhr area becomes public, and from then on it can happen quickly, especially here in the Ruhr area, since many people commute from town to town every day. But as I said, I continue to live as always and do not really think about it.

This post has been translated automatically

Hexe4224
Amateur
That's how I see it too, about climate or anything else
Nix more
Only corona

Edit: removed empty quote

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
chinese sweet and sour evolution gaming

This post has been translated automatically

Cheeseburger
Experienced
In our country, at least, no one abides by any restrictions, and I also believe that our police no longer have the will to bend a finger for incompetent politicians.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics16th May. 2024 at 12:04 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately