Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 350)

robby811 wrote on 01/02/2021 at 21:40
But only the alu hats model FFP2

This post has been translated automatically

warennn wrote on 26.01.2021 at 05:47 clock: Seh I also so and can understand you as an asthmatic well. Am as far as I know so far spared from ner infection, but am also very careful since march...
But stupidity can not be forbidden and you can not convert these deniers. there helps only contact parents and pull the internet plug... Found the idea that recently went through the media eig top, coronaleugner not to ventilate if it would be necessary ... but is probably too difficult to enforce, so we have to live with egoists like from your quote in this society
At that time there would not have been ^^

This post has been translated automatically

upola wrote on 01.02.2021 at 21:43
Don't you think the medical ones are enough?

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Falcon wrote on 02.02.2021 at 06:28
So you think the '' idea'' is good when you kill people? That's exactly what it is when you deny a person a vital treatment.

And you really think you are one of the good guys?

It's shameful that you can say something like that in public without an outcry.
People like you are a danger to society
And for that you get 5 likes. Unbelievable.

And your ''at that time would not have given'' and stupid smilie to it, probably clearly refers to a very dark time that you probably wish back.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi wrote on 02.02.2021 at 08:24
That's all the corona deniers do! They want to let everything run normally! So everyone just wet happy running around with the virus. Isn't that also somehow deliberate "killing people"? I mean, if too many suffer from it, one can help sometime hardly still someone, as one sees it by the way in other countries already!


" It is to shame that one can express something like that publicly without there being an outcry." <-----This statement of yours refers rather also what you address at the end and namely this "<ygt></ygt>refers probably clearly to a very dark time, which you probably wish back.<ygt></ygt><ygt></ygt>". In that dark time you're referring to, some also had quite a problem with freedom of speech!

So before you accuse someone of something, rather think about how you express yourself!!!

Ps.: Why should you help a denier if there is the virus, in his opinion but anyway not? Or differently, one can help him however then please completely completely at the end because according to his statement, there is not the virus and then I would say, should he times not so anstellen!

This post has been translated automatically

Falcon wrote on 02.02.2021 at 08:53 Clock
Sorry, I'm certainly not going to start a long discussion with you now, especially since you don't seem to have dealt with the facts.

That one must speak in the 21.Jhr at all still about something actually completely self-evident.
Even serious criminals such as murderers and rapists, a doctor may not refuse medical treatment

And you seriously want to let other people die because they have another opinion like you? Because they have a different point of view than you?

How would it be then if one would make it fair? Some people give up the intensive care bed and people like you immediately quit their job and give it to someone who lost his job because of the measures. In addition, you give away all your money and property to feed the families that are now floundering? Would that be something for you, if the state comes by and kicks you out of your apartment and your account is completely seized, including termination?
Let me guess - that's something completely different again. But then that's nothing more than double standards

You'd better think about what kind of thinking you're seriously carrying around inside you. The fact that such inhuman proposals even go unchallenged through the media and are proposed by someone from the "Ethics Council" does not make the whole thing any better. On the contrary.

The abolition of basic rights was always justified with a great threat.
What most people have realized far too late is that the great threat is the abolition of fundamental rights.

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie wrote on 02/02/2021 at 09:06 PM
Discussions with Corona's witnesses are pointless.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Falke wrote on 02.02.2021 at 08:53 Clock
Sorry, I'm certainly not going to start a long discussion with you now, especially since you don't seem to have dealt with the facts.

That one must speak in the 21.Jhr at all still about something actually completely self-evident.
Even serious criminals such as murderers and rapists, a doctor may not refuse medical treatment

And you seriously want to let other people die because they have another opinion like you? Because they have a different point of view than you?

How would it be then if one would make it fair? Some people give up the intensive care bed and people like you immediately quit their job and give it to someone who lost his job because of the measures. In addition, you give away all your money and property to feed the families that are now floundering? Would that be something for you, if the state comes by and kicks you out of your apartment and your account is completely seized, including termination?
Let me guess - that's something completely different again. But then that's nothing more than double standards

You'd better think about what kind of thinking you're seriously carrying around inside you. The fact that such inhuman proposals even go unchallenged through the media and are proposed by someone from the "Ethics Council" does not make the whole thing any better. On the contrary.

The abolition of basic rights was always justified with a great threat.
What most people have realized far too late is that the great threat is the abolition of fundamental rights.

This post has been translated automatically